Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > Latest News
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Low-risk H5N1 bird flu in Ohio wild birds- USDA
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

Low-risk H5N1 bird flu in Ohio wild birds- USDA

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Low-risk H5N1 bird flu in Ohio wild birds- USDA
    Posted: October 14 2006 at 7:16pm
Low-risk H5N1 bird flu in Ohio wild birds- USDA

WASHINGTON, Oct 14 (Reuters) - Northern pintail birds in Ohio have tested positive for a low-pathogenic strain of the H5N1 bird flu virus, the U.S. government said on Saturday, adding to recent cases in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Michigan.

A strain of the H5N1 avian influenza virus was found in "apparently healthy" wild birds sampled Oct. 8 in Ottawa County, located on Lake Erie about 15 miles (24 km) southeast of Toledo, the departments of Agriculture and Interior said.

"Initial tests confirm that these wild bird samples do not contain the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain that has spread through birds in Asia, Europe and Africa," the USDA said in a statement.

The government said it was conducting additional tests to determine, in part, if the ducks had H5N1 or two separate strains with one virus contributing H5 and the other N1. A second round of tests could take up to 21 days to confirm whether it was the low-pathogenic H5N1 bird flu.

< ="http://int1.fp.sandpiper.net/reuters/editorial/s/AC_RunActiveContent.js" =text/> < =text/> AC_FL_RunContent('codebase','http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,19,0','width','175','height','130','align','middle','src','http://today.reuters.com/media/editorial/election2006/electionsNews_3headlines_v1','quality','high','bgcolor','#ffffff','name','foo','allowscriptaccess','always','pluginspage','http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer','movie','http://today.reuters.com/media/editorial/election2006/electionsNews_3headlines_v1' ); < code=http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,19,0 height=130 width=175 align=middle id=clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000 name=foo>< NAME="_cx" VALUE="4630">< NAME="_cy" VALUE="3440">< NAME="FlashVars" VALUE="">< NAME="Movie" VALUE="http://today.reuters.com/media/editorial/election2006/electionsNews_3lines_v1.swf">< NAME="" VALUE="http://today.reuters.com/media/editorial/election2006/electionsNews_3lines_v1.swf">< NAME="WMode" VALUE="">< NAME="Play" VALUE="0">< NAME="Loop" VALUE="-1">< NAME="Quality" VALUE="High">< NAME="SAlign" VALUE="">< NAME="Menu" VALUE="-1">< NAME="" VALUE="">< NAME="AllowAccess" VALUE="always">< NAME="Scale" VALUE="ShowAll">< NAME="DeviceFont" VALUE="0">< NAME="Movie" VALUE="0">< NAME="" VALUE="FFFFFF">< NAME="SWRemote" VALUE="">< NAME="Movie" VALUE="">< NAME="SeamlessTabbing" VALUE="1">< NAME="Pro" VALUE="0">< NAME="ProAddress" VALUE="">< NAME="Pro" VALUE="0">< NAME="AllowNetworking" VALUE="all"> < width="175" height="130" align="middle" ="http://today.reuters.com/media/editorial/election2006/electionsNews_3lines_v1.swf" quality="high" ="#ffffff" name="foo" allowaccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashp" ="application/x-shockwave-flash" > < id="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" code="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,0,0" width="175" height="130" id="rssReader_v2" align="middle"> < NAME="AllowAccess" VALUE="always"> < name="movie" value="http://today.reuters.com/media/editorial/election2006/electionsNews_3lines_v1.swf" />< name="quality" value="high" />< name="" value="#ffffff" />< ="http://today.reuters.com/media/editorial/election2006/electionsNews_3lines_v1.swf" quality="high" ="#ffffff" width="175" height="130" name="rssReader_v2" align="middle" allowAccess="sameDomain" ="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashp" />

The virus also was found in Pennsylvania in September and in Michigan and Maryland in August.

The Agriculture and Interior departments are working with states to collect between 75,000 and 100,000 wild bird samples in addition to more than 50,000 environmental tests throughout the United States.

A low-pathogenic strain, which produces less disease and mortality in birds than does a high-pathogenic version, poses no threat to humans. It is common for mild and low pathogenic strains of bird flu to appear in the United States and other countries.

The latest H5N1 bird flu strain in Asia, Europe and Africa is known to have killed at least 141 people and forced hundreds of millions of birds to be destroyed.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 14 2006 at 8:07pm
Montana was reporting the h5n1 in pintails sept 21 also.
 
Illinios reported it in Greenwing teals around 9/29.
 
It was reportedly found in Lakeport CA but the USDA has not issued a report on it.
Back to Top
MelodyAtHome View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: May 16 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2018
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MelodyAtHome Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 14 2006 at 8:10pm
I'm in northeast Ohio...this is getting to close for me...so do these healthy looking birds who have the low path virus spread it to other birds and can this become high path?
Melody
Emergency Preparedness 911
http://emergencypreparedness911.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 14 2006 at 8:13pm
From WHO website:
 
 
Only viruses of the H5 and H7 subtypes are known to cause the highly pathogenic form of the disease. However, not all viruses of the H5 and H7 subtypes are highly pathogenic and not all will cause severe disease in poultry.

On present understanding, H5 and H7 viruses are introduced to poultry flocks in their low pathogenic form. When allowed to circulate in poultry populations, the viruses can mutate, usually within a few months, into the highly pathogenic form. This is why the presence of an H5 or H7 virus in poultry is always cause for concern, even when the initial signs of infection are mild.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 14 2006 at 8:16pm

Are there any other causes for concern?

Yes. Several.

Domestic ducks can now excrete large quantities of highly pathogenic virus without showing signs of illness, and are now acting as a “silent” reservoir of the virus, perpetuating transmission to other birds. This adds yet another layer of complexity to control efforts and removes the warning signal for humans to avoid risky behaviours.

• When compared with H5N1 viruses from 1997 and early 2004, H5N1 viruses now circulating are more lethal to experimentally infected mice and to ferrets (a mammalian model) and survive longer in the environment.

• H5N1 appears to have expanded its host range, infecting and killing mammalian species previously considered resistant to infection with avian influenza viruses.

• The behaviour of the virus in its natural reservoir, wild waterfowl, may be changing. The spring 2005 die-off of upwards of 6,000 migratory birds at a nature reserve in central China, caused by highly pathogenic H5N1, was highly unusual and probably unprecedented. In the past, only two large die-offs in migratory birds, caused by highly pathogenic viruses, are known to have occurred: in South Africa in 1961 (H5N3) and in Hong Kong in the winter of 2002–2003 (H5N1).

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 14 2006 at 8:26pm

Low-risk H5N1 bird flu in Ohio wild birds- USDA
Reuters via Yahoo! News - 0 KB- Found: 3 hours ago
Northern pintail birds in Ohio have tested positive for a low-pathogenic strain of the H5N1 bird flu virus, the U.S. government said on Saturday, adding to recent cases in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Michigan.  Ouch whats the flight plan where's next ??

Back to Top
gettingready View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: October 11 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 67
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gettingready Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 14 2006 at 11:09pm
A little history on low-path H5N1: 
 
 
 
LPAI H5N1 ("North American" H5N1)

LPAI, or "low path" AI, commonly occurs in wild birds. In most cases, it causes minor sickness or no noticeable signs of disease. It is rarely fatal in birds. LPAI strains are not a human health concern. This includes LPAI H5N1.

Evidence of LPAI H5N1 has been found in wild birds in the United States in recent years and is not closely related to the more severe HPAI H5N1 circulating overseas. Examples of historical reports of LPAI H5N1 received by USDA include:

1975 - LPAI H5N1 was detected in a wild mallard duck and a wild blue goose in Wisconsin as part of routine sampling, not as a result of noticeable illness in the birds

1981 and 1985 - the University of Minnesota conducted a sampling procedure in which sentinel ducks were monitored in cages placed in the wild for a short period of time and LPAI H5N1 was detected in those ducks in both years.

1983 - LPAI H5N1 was detected in ring-billed gulls in Pennsylvania.

1986 - LPAI H5N1 was detected in a wild mallard duck in Ohio as part of routine sampling, not as a result of noticeable illness in the birds.

2002 - LPAI H5N1 antibodies were detected in turkeys in Michigan but the virus could not be isolated; therefore this detection could not be confirmed.

2005 - LPAI H5N1 was detected in ducks in Manitoba, Canada.

2006 - LPAI H5N1 was confirmed in two Michigan mute swans, Maryland resident wild mallard ducks, and Pennsylvania wild mallard ducks sampled as part of USDA's expanded avian influenza surveillance.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 8:00am
Pintails were thought to be bringing it down from Alaska. Remember reading this.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 8:03am

In Washington, wildlife biologists began testing 2,500 wild birds in July, focusing on those most likely to have interacted with Asian migratory birds this summer, according to a Jun 13 press release from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The first areas tested were northern Puget Sound and coastal estuaries. Waterfowl testing will focus on pintails and mallards and when possible will include wigeons, green-winged teals, shovelers, and sea ducks. Shorebird testing will target Western sandpipers and dunlin, and when possible will include red knots and ruddy turnstones.

The WDFW estimates that about 1 million geese, 12 million ducks, and 150,000 swans pass through the Pacific flyway each year, beginning in August, on their return from the Arctic. In addition, hundreds of thousands of autumn-migrating shorebirds arrive in Washington between July and October.

 
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 10:14am

Northern Pintails

Some avian flu viruses have in the past made their way from Europe and Asia into North America.

"It does not occur very frequently," said Ip, of the USGS. "But it has happened, and it will happen again in the future."

The avian flu surveys underway in Alaska have been piggybacked on already scheduled efforts to examine certain bird species, band them, and track their movements before hunting season.

Working at several Alaskan sites, bird experts have collected samples from geese and ducks by taking swabs from the birds' tailpipes to see if the birds are carrying the virus in their feces.

Among the target species is the Northern pintail, a migratory duck common in Alaska. Some Alaskan pintails are known to summer in Russia.

"If there is transmission of avian flu going on among the wild population of birds, pintails could potentially become infected and bring the virus to North America," said Russ Oates, the chief of the waterfowl branch at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Anchorage.

So far, there is no evidence of avian flu in North America. But Ip worries that it might just be a matter of time before the disease spreads out of Asia.

"The longer the virus persists in poultry, the greater the chance that, at some point, it will spread to species of wild birds that can carry the virus to new areas," the USGS virologist said. "It is like playing Russian roulette—time is not on our side."

 
 
Back to Top
doabirds View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: June 27 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 54
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote doabirds Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 10:40am
    Its walways low path h5n1

And will continue to be until people get sick. Fortunately most Americans do no live with birds like overseas but rest assured even if we have commercial flocks die off noone will ever tell you its highly pathogenic h5n1. The government is more concerned with commerce and coverups.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 10:48am
I'm too laszy to find the link to the WHO article again, but I'll say it again. The WHO has confirmed ducks can have high path H5N1 and appear healthy. the northern pintail and greenwing teals are ducks.
Back to Top
CTS_44 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: August 19 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CTS_44 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 4:09pm
Hi,

I'd like to point out again here that each time the USDA releases a statement it says:

1.  We have found low path.
2.  There was no high path of the same strain found in Asia.

Exactly like that.  From a lawyer's point of view, these statements would be true if they found a DIFFERENT high path strain of H5N1 than the one in Asia.  Same wording every time.  The previous statements from the WHO have shown you have to look for loopholes.

Curt
<>function PrivoxyWindowOpen(a, b, c){return(window.open(a, b, c));}
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 4:39pm
From a lawyer's point of view, these statements would be true if they found a DIFFERENT high path strain of H5N1 than the one in Asia.
 
Very good point. Its the h5 and the n1 but not the one from Asia!
Back to Top
July View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: May 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1660
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote July Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 15 2006 at 6:04pm
Bird Flu Hits America
Monday, 16-October-2006, 05:27:47 Clicks: 45 Send to a friend Print Version
Washington, Indonesia-Relief -- The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Department of the Interior (DOI) on Saturday announced a detection of H5 and N1 avian influenza subtypes in samples from apparently healthy wild Northern pintails in Ottawa County, Ohio, that were killed by a hunter. Initial tests confirm that these wild bird samples do not contain the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain that has spread through birds in Asia, Europe and Africa. Initial test results indicate the presence of low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) virus, which poses no threat to human health.

The bird samples were collected on Oct. 8 through a partnership between USDA and the Ohio Division of Wildlife as part of an expanded wild bird monitoring program. USDA and DOI are working collaboratively with states to sample wild birds throughout the U.S. for the presence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI). As a result of this expanded testing program, USDA and DOI expect to identify additional cases of common strains of avian influenza in birds, which is not cause for concern.

Thirty five samples were collected directly from the birds and screened for H5 at the Ohio Dept of Agriculture Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory. Of those samples, two were sent to USDA's National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) in Ames, Iowa, for confirmatory testing and one screened by NVSL tested positive for both H5 and N1 subtypes. This does not mean these birds are infected with an H5N1 strain. It is possible that there could be two separate avian influenza viruses, one containing H5 and the other containing N1.

Confirmatory testing underway at NVSL will clarify whether one or more strains of the virus are present, the specific subtype, as well as confirm the pathogenicity. These results are expected within two to three weeks and will be made public when completed.

Low pathogenic avian influenza commonly occurs in wild birds. It typically causes only minor sickness or no noticeable symptoms in birds. These strains of the virus include LPAI H5N1, commonly referred to as North American H5N1, which is very different from the more severe HPAI H5N1 circulating overseas.

There is no known health risk to hunters or hunting dogs from contact with low pathogenic forms of avian influenza virus. Nevertheless, hunters are always encouraged to use common sense sanitation practices, such as hand washing and thorough cooking, when handling or preparing wildlife of any kind. DOI has issued guidelines for safe handling and preparation of wild game.

Link:
http://www.usda.gov/birdflu
http://www.doi.gov/issues/avianflu.html
http://www.avianflu.gov.
Back to Top
Dlugose View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: July 28 2006
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Points: 277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dlugose Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2006 at 2:58pm
Originally posted by CTS_44 CTS_44 wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to point out again here that each time the USDA releases a statement it says:

1.  We have found low path.
2.  There was no high path of the same strain found in Asia.

Exactly like that.  From a lawyer's point of view, these statements would be true if they found a DIFFERENT high path strain of H5N1 than the one in Asia.  Same wording every time.  The previous statements from the WHO have shown you have to look for loopholes.

Curt
<>function PrivoxyWindowOpen(a, b, c){return(window.open(a, b, c));}
One thing frustrating about this website is that no matter how many times something gets posted, sooner or later it is dropped off the site and forgotten. 
You are talking as if there is a low path version and a high path version of the same virus.  LP H5N1 is not at all related to HP H5N1.  It is nothing like a mild flu and a serious flu.  LP H5N1 cannot change into HP H5N1.  The mutation dangers regularly talked about are that HP H5N1 will mutate into the same HP H5N1 that is more able to infect human tissues.
They do not mean they have found a low path version of the H5N1 that is circulating in Asia.  Just like there are different viral hepatitis like A, B, C, D, E, none of these can change into another. 
As for carrier ducks and geese, usually they are carriers of LPAI, and they are no danger to anyone.  Occasionally there are some asymptomatic waterfowl infected with HP H5N1... these ARE dangerous to other birds, but they are unusual, and have never been found in North or South America.  With the right tests, you can tell the difference between LP H5N1 and aymptomatic HP H5N1.
Dlugose RN AAS BA BS Cert. Biotechnology. Respiratory nurse
June 2013: public health nurse volunteer, Asia
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2006 at 4:09pm
From WHO website re LOW & HIGH PATH:
 

Which viruses cause highly pathogenic disease?

Influenza A viruses1 have 16 H subtypes and 9 N subtypes2. Only viruses of the H5 and H7 subtypes are known to cause the highly pathogenic form of the disease. However, not all viruses of the H5 and H7 subtypes are highly pathogenic and not all will cause severe disease in poultry.

On present understanding, H5 and H7 viruses are introduced to poultry flocks in their low pathogenic form. When allowed to circulate in poultry populations, the viruses can mutate, usually within a few months, into the highly pathogenic form. This is why the presence of an H5 or H7 virus in poultry is always cause for concern, even when the initial signs of infection are mild.

Back to Top
CTS_44 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: August 19 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CTS_44 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 16 2006 at 10:46pm
Hi Dan and thanks for your message.

1. LP H5N1 is not at all related to HP H5N1   -    Okay, never said that
2. LP H5N1 cannot change into HP H5N1  -   Okay, never said that
3. They do not mean they have found a low path version of the H5N1 that is circulating in Asia   -  Okay, never said or meant to imply that.

According to a certain doctor, "H5N1 is problematic because wild birds are frequently infected with multiple strains" in his Sept 30th commentary.

So, they found low path, they didn't find the Asian high path, and my point was that their statement left open the possibility of a high path strain NOT of the same strain that is in Asia.

I realize I'm splitting hairs here, and it may seem excessively paranoid, but I don't see any logical problem with my post.  A bird can have both high and low path strains at the same time, right?

Curt
-


<>function PrivoxyWindowOpen(a, b, c){return(window.open(a, b, c));}
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2006 at 6:39am
Originally posted by CTS_44 CTS_44 wrote:

Hi Dan and thanks for your message.

1. LP H5N1 is not at all related to HP H5N1   -    Okay, never said that
2. LP H5N1 cannot change into HP H5N1  -   Okay, never said that
3. They do not mean they have found a low path version of the H5N1 that is circulating in Asia   -  Okay, never said or meant to imply that.

According to a certain doctor, "H5N1 is problematic because wild birds are frequently infected with multiple strains" in his Sept 30th commentary.

So, they found low path, they didn't find the Asian high path, and my point was that their statement left open the possibility of a high path strain NOT of the same strain that is in Asia.

I realize I'm splitting hairs here, and it may seem excessively paranoid, but I don't see any logical problem with my post.  A bird can have both high and low path strains at the same time, right?

Curt
-

));}
 
Curt,
 
In my opinion, you are 100% correct. It is called deception and it is done on purpose. people take formal training on how to do this. I was one of them.
 
By saying they found low path and by saying they didn't find the hi path strain from asia, most people assume they didn't find hi path, but that is not what is being said.
 
Like I said a long time ago. It is more important to pay attention to what they don't say and how they don't say it.
Back to Top
July View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: May 24 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1660
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote July Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 17 2006 at 7:24am
WILD BIRD SAMPLES FROM OTTAWA COUNTY TO UNDERGO ADDITIONAL AVIAN FLU TESTING

Oct 16, 2006


Avian flu subtypes have been detected in two apparently healthy wild Northern pintail ducks that were killed recently by a hunter in Ottawa County.  Officials from the U.S. Department of Interior and the U.S. Department of Agriculture made the announcement on Saturday.
 
They said that although H5 and N1 avian influenza subtypes were found in the ducks, the samples did not contain the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain that has spread through birds in Asia, Europe and Africa.  There have been no known cases of H5N1 in the United States.
 
Initial tests on the pintails detected the presence of H5 andathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) virus, which poses no threat to human health.  Confirmatory testing is underway at the National Veterinary Service Laboratories in Ames, Iowa and will clarify whether one or more strains of the virus are present, the specific subtype, and also confirm the pathogenicity. Results are expected in two to three weeks.
 
Federal officials said low pathogenic avian influenza is not uncommon in wild birds and usually causes only minor sickness in the birds.  These strains of the virus include LPAI H5N1, commonly referred to as "North American" H5N1, which is very different from the more severe HPAI H5N1 circulating overseas.
 
Officials also said there is no known health risk to hunters or hunting dogs from contact with low pathogenic forms of avian influenza virus. Nevertheless, hunters are always encouraged to use common sense sanitation practices, such as hand washing and thorough cooking, when handling or preparing wildlife of any kind. DOI has issued guidelines for safe handling and preparation of wild game.
 
For more information about USDA's efforts and research related to avian influenza, go to http://www.usda.gov/birdflu.
 
For more information about Interior's efforts and hunter education program, go to http://www.doi.gov/issues/avianflu.html
 
For information about the federal government's overall efforts related to avian influenza and human pandemic preparedness, go to http://www.avianflu.gov.
Back to Top
Dlugose View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: July 28 2006
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Points: 277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dlugose Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2006 at 11:10am
Originally posted by BabyGirl BabyGirl wrote:

From WHO website re LOW & HIGH PATH:
On present understanding, H5 and H7 viruses are introduced to poultry flocks in their low pathogenic form. When allowed to circulate in poultry populations, the viruses can mutate, usually within a few months, into the highly pathogenic form. This is why the presence of an H5 or H7 virus in poultry is always cause for concern, even when the initial signs of infection are mild.
Thanks for that quotation.  I see now why you find low path alarming.
However, considering the history of spread in Asia, the genetics, etc. I think the danger from low path in North America is much less worse. 
2 reasons:
 
1) In a more detailed document at the WHO site (and I think others there),
http://www.who.int/csr/don/2004_03_02/en/
"When the virus was allowed to continue circulating in poultry, it eventually mutated (within 6 to 9 months) into a highly pathogenic form with a mortality ratio approaching 100%." 
So having an introduction of low path becomes a danger if not noticed or not treated in birds.  In the US and Canada there is a lot of bird surveillance and especially poultry, so there are never months going by where poultry are passing LPAI to each other.
 
2) At present we rightly fear increased transmissions from humans to humans in places like Indonesia.  This requires MORE mutations to happen that favor the spread, and more mutations of course could alter the virus in other ways such as making it less lethal.  If LPAI H5N1 was in North America, it would first have to go through several months of mutations to adapt well to poultry.  This would not adapt it to humans.  THEN it would still have to mutate further to adapt to human spread.
 
There is much more danger to us from it going human to human in a strain in Asia that is already high path in birds.
Dlugose RN AAS BA BS Cert. Biotechnology. Respiratory nurse
June 2013: public health nurse volunteer, Asia
Back to Top
Dlugose View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: July 28 2006
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Points: 277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dlugose Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2006 at 1:15pm
Originally posted by CTS_44 CTS_44 wrote:

Hi Dan and thanks for your message.
So, they found low path, they didn't find the Asian high path, and my point was that their statement left open the possibility of a high path strain NOT of the same strain that is in Asia.
<>function PrivoxyWindowOpen(a, b, c){return(window.open(a, b, c));}
 
Curt, let's stick to wording from the USDA, which is what you are criticizing, not some newspaper article interpreting what they say.  Here is their statement on one of the samples retested in the recent Ohio birds:
" The initial rapid screening tests are highly sensitive and can detect active and inactive viruses in samples. Varieties of this test can screen for the presence of all strains of avian influenza virus. Because these rapid screening tests are highly sensitive, it is not uncommon to have positive results for a specific subtype on the initial screen test and yet not be able to isolate a virus of that subtype. This was the case for these samples, which tested as a weak positive for both H5 and N1 in the initial screen tests. During confirmatory testing, H5 and N1 subtypes were not found but instead H6 and N2, confirming that the virus is LPAI."
 
My comments:  A test that is very sensitive means that it gets a lot of positives, but if it is not highly specific, it may saying a test is positive when the reason that it is positive is that it can be triggered by some other cause, in this case some other flu virus.  The reason they keep using this rapid testing in spite of errors is that 1) the reliable testing is so slow that it does not give enough time warning that there may be a serious problem and 2) the cost and difficulty of always using the almost 100% reliable methods.
 
Dlugose RN AAS BA BS Cert. Biotechnology. Respiratory nurse
June 2013: public health nurse volunteer, Asia
Back to Top
Chloe View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: October 18 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 199
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Chloe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2006 at 4:34pm
My suggestion would be to get some reporter to ask the USDA if HPAI in any form has been found inside the US (including Alaska and Hawaii) in either wild birds or domestic flocks of any type.
Back to Top
Dlugose View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: July 28 2006
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Points: 277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dlugose Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 19 2006 at 5:42pm
Originally posted by Chloe Chloe wrote:

ask the USDA if HPAI in any form has been found inside the US (including Alaska and Hawaii) in either wild birds or domestic flocks of any type.
Dev Biol (Basel). 2006;124:37-44.  Ecology and epidemiology of avian influenza in North and South America.Senne DA, Suarez DL, Stallnecht DE, Pedersen JC, Panigrahy B. US Department of Agriculture, APHIS, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, IA 10050, USA. dennis.a.senne@aphis.usda.gov
Wild waterfowl and shorebirds are known to be the natural reservoir for influenza A viruses. Surveillance studies in waterfowl and shorebirds in North America show that influenza A viruses are repeatedly recovered from these birds. However, the virus recovery is influenced by geography, season, age and species of birds. In addition to the natural reservoir, the live-bird marketing system (LBMS) in certain regions of the United States has been recognized as a man-made reservoir of influenza viruses and has been linked to several outbreaks of low pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) in poultry. Outbreaks of LPAI in commercial poultry is attributed to movement of infected birds, dirty or improperly cleaned crates, and contaminated vehicles from the LBMS to poultry farms. However, in the majority of outbreaks in poultry, the source of infection is suspected to be wild aquatic birds or the source is unknown. Since 2002, three outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) have occurred in the Americas; one each in Chile (H7N3), United States (H5N2), and Canada (H7N3). In each of these outbreaks, a precursor virus of low pathogenicity mutated to become highly pathogenic after circulating in poultry. The HPAI viruses recovered from the three outbreaks had unique molecular and phenotypic characteristics that do not conform to other known HPAI viruses. These findings emphasize the need for monitoring wild and domestic bird species for presence of influenza A viruses.
Dlugose RN AAS BA BS Cert. Biotechnology. Respiratory nurse
June 2013: public health nurse volunteer, Asia
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2006 at 5:38am
 
Low path H5N1 has been conirmed in US. This verifies that Hi path can mutate from low path and the times it has, it has not been the same hi path virus found elsewere.
 
It gives plausibility to the hole in the press releases talkied about in other threads about the possibility that the is a high path virus in the US that is not the same as the HIgh path virus in asia.
Back to Top
Dlugose View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: July 28 2006
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Points: 277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dlugose Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2006 at 9:41am
Originally posted by mach mach wrote:

Low path H5N1 has been conirmed in US.
JOINT DOI AND USDA NEWS RELEASE: OHIO WILD BIRD SAMPLES UNDERGO ADDITIONAL AVIAN INFLUENZA TESTING
  WASHINGTON, Oct. 14, 2006 - The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Department of the Interior (DOI) today announced a detection of H5 and N1 avian influenza subtypes in samples from apparently healthy wild Northern pintails in Ottawa County, Ohio, that were killed by a hunter. Initial tests confirm that these wild bird samples do not contain the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain that has spread through birds in Asia, Europe and Africa. …
Of those samples, two were sent to USDA's National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) in Ames, Iowa, for confirmatory testing and one screened by NVSL tested positive for both H5 and N1 subtypes. This does not mean these birds are infected with an H5N1 strain. It is possible that there could be two separate avian influenza viruses, one containing H5 and the other containing N1.
Confirmatory testing underway at NVSL will clarify whether one or more strains of the virus are present, the specific subtype, as well as confirm the pathogenicity. These results are expected within two to three weeks and will be made public when completed.
 
A list of all the USDA reports, not your East Podunk newspaper digest of them, is at http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_A/7_0_1OB?navid=AI_NEWS&parentnav=AVIAN_INFLUENZA&navtype=RT.  Find some H5N1 confirmed report!
Dlugose RN AAS BA BS Cert. Biotechnology. Respiratory nurse
June 2013: public health nurse volunteer, Asia
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 20 2006 at 9:55am
Bird flu may wing its way to local shores

By RICHARD DEGENER Staff Writer, (609) 463-6711
Published: Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Updated: Tuesday, March 14, 2006
http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/local/capemay/story/6025984p-5998956c.html

CAPE MAY — One of the area's biggest tourist industries and a dangerous virus sweeping Asia, Europe and Africa may be on a collision course with a meeting date sometime next fall.

Millions of dollars are spent each fall as tourists come here to observe migratory birds heading south. Scientists with the U.S. Geological Survey, however, are worried some of those birds may carry the deadly avian flu virus, more commonly known as bird flu. They are concerned because North American birds go up to Alaska, Canada and Russia during the summer and mix with birds from Asian flyways. A few North American species even winter in Asia.

While most scientists believe the bird flu would likely come down from Alaska via the Pacific Flyway, and not down the Atlantic Flyway that passes New Jersey, there is a strong belief that it will come with migratory birds. There is evidence bird migrations are helping move the flu around Asia, Europe and Africa already. More reports are coming in of the virus being in migratory birds. Will they bring it here?

“It's probably not if, but when,” said Leslie Dierauf, director of the USGS National Wildlife Health Center in Wisconsin.

Dierauf said Congress has given the USGS and other federal agencies $12 million to test wild birds for the virus, a program that began in August and which serves as an early-warning system of the arrival of the virus. A meeting is taking place in Ohio next week so the councils that oversee the flyways can decide where to test and what birds to sample. Testing done thus far has found a low-pathogen virus in 10-percent of the birds sampled, but none have had the deadly H5N1 strain blamed for sickening 147 people and causing 78 deaths, mostly in southeast Asia.

Most of those deaths have been blamed on contract with domestic birds. The concern is that the virus has caused death in more than 60 species of wild birds, and when the virus jumps to new species it can mutate. The main concern is it could mutate into a virus that is easily transmitted among humans. That could cause the first global influenza pandemic since World War I.

“Migratory birds are reservoirs for the virus, but they usually don't get sick. When the low-pathogen virus mixes with domestic birds, it becomes highly pathogenic and kills poultry,” Dierauf said.

What's more disturbing in this case is that the newly created virus has then gone back to wild birds.This had previously happened only one time before on a large scale, in 1961 in South Africa, Dierauf said. It happened last spring in Qinghai, China when as much as 10 percent of the known population of bar-headed geese died of H5N1.

“We're worried about people, the poultry industry and wild birds. The key is to keep wild birds separate from domestic birds so they don't mix. When they mix, something peculiar happens genetically that nobody can really explain yet,” Dierauf said.

Peter Dunne, who directs the New Jersey Audubon Society's Cape May Bird Observatory, said it would be impossible to control the wild bird population. He said it wouldn't succeed and it would do a lot of damage

“This is the natural world in motion. Objecting to this is like saying, ‘Stop the world, I want to get off,' ” Dunne said.

The list of the most worrisome species also reduces Dunne's concern for the East Coast. Dierauf said the biggest concern on the Atlantic Flyway are the horned grebe, tundra swan and greater scaup. Dunne said the horned grebe is “a regular here,” but the greater scaup and tundra swan are not common.

Other waterfowl species of concern, birds that mix in the north with Asian birds, are the whooper swan, emperor goose, black brant, and Aleutian Canada goose. Dunne said none are regulars here.

Shorebirds of concern include the Pacific golden plover, black-bellied plover, semipalmated plover, black-tailed godwit and marbled godwit. There are also three loon species that will be tested, including red-throated, yellow-billed and Pacific Arctic loon. Dunne said even in cases where some of these birds frequent the East Coast, the population is often separate from the those birds heading down the Pacific coast, which are mixing in Alaska and Siberia.

“It would be tantamount to listening to traffic reports from Los Angeles and getting concerned about road closings,” Dunne said.

The prevailing westerly winds on the East Coast actually serve to blow more North American birds to the Old World rather than vice versa. One exception is the Northern wheatear, which migrates from the Northeast polar region to Africa.

Still, Dunne acknowledges any disease that gets to this continent could spread across it.

“We're bird experts, not flu experts,” Dunne said.

The bird flu first arose in 1997 in Asia and has since become the largest and most severe outbreak among poultry ever recorded. The people who got it had contact with domestic birds. No cases of transmission between humans has been recorded.

There is concern the virus could find other ways to America, such as travel by infected people and illegal smuggling of birds.



To e-mail Richard Degener at The Press:

RDegener@pressofac.com
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down