Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Global Climate Change (Temperature Puzzle)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

Global Climate Change (Temperature Puzzle)

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5678>
Author
Message
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 21 2011 at 4:22pm

Global temperatures in September were eighth warmest on record

Annual minimum Arctic sea ice extent second smallest ever recorded

October 13, 2011


Global surface temperature Anomalies - September 2011. (Credit: NOAA)

The Earth experienced its eighth warmest September since record keeping began in 1880. The annual minimum Arctic sea ice extent was reached on September 9 and ranked as the second smallest extent since satellite records began in 1979.

This monthly analysis from NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center is part of the suite of climate services NOAA provides government, business and community leaders so they can make informed decisions.

Global Temperature Highlights: September

  • The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for September was the eighth warmest on record at 59.95˚F (15.53˚C), which is 0.95˚F (0.53˚C) above the 20th century average of 59.0˚F (15.0˚C). The margin of error associated with this temperature is +/- 0.20˚F (0.11˚C).

  • Separately, the global land surface temperature was 1.57˚F (0.87˚C) above the 20th century average of 53.6˚F (12.0˚C), making this the fourth warmest September on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.43˚F (0.24˚C). Warmer-than-average conditions occurred across Europe, northern and western Africa, western Russia, the western and northeastern United States, Canada, and Mexico. Cooler-than-average regions included much of eastern Asia, and part of the central United States.

  • The September global ocean surface temperature was 0.72˚F (0.40˚C) above the 20th century average of 61.1˚F (16.2˚C), making it the 14th warmest September on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.07˚F (0.04˚C). The warmth was most pronounced across the north central and northwest Pacific Ocean and within about the 30°N–40°N latitude belt across the Atlantic.

  • The United Kingdom marked its warmest September since 2006 and sixth warmest in the last 100 years, at 2.7˚F (1.5˚C) above the 1971–2000 average.

  • Spain had its warmest September since 1990 and fifth warmest for the past 50 years, at 3.2˚F (1.8˚C) above the 1971–2000 average.

Global Temperature Highlights: Year to date

  • The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for the January – September period was 0.94˚F (0.52˚C) above the 20th century average of 57.5˚F (14.1˚C), making it the 11th warmest such period on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.18˚F (0.10˚C).

  • The January – September worldwide land surface temperature was 1.44˚F (0.80˚C) above the 20th century average — the seventh warmest such period on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.36˚F (0.20˚C). The global ocean surface temperature for the year to date was 0.74˚F (0.41˚C) above the 20th century average and was the 12th warmest such period on record. The margin of error is +/-0.07˚F (0.04˚C).

  • La Niña conditions strengthened during September. According to NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center, La Niña is expected to gradually strengthen further and continue into the Northern Hemisphere winter 2011/12.

Global significant events for September 2011.   (Credit: NOAA)

Polar Sea Ice and Precipitation Highlights

  • Arctic sea ice reached its annual minimum extent on September 9 at 1.67 million square miles (4.33 million square km), marking the second smallest extent on record. In September 2007, the sea ice extent dipped to 1.61 million square miles (4.17 million square km).  According to the University of Washington’s Polar Science Center, Arctic sea ice volume, which depends on ice thickness and extent, dropped to 960 cubic miles (4,000 cubic km) on September 10, the smallest volume on record.

  • The average Arctic sea ice extent for the month was 34.5 percent below average, ranking as the second smallest September extent since satellite records began in 1979. The extent was 938,000 square miles (2.43 million square kilometers) below average and 120,000 square miles (310,000 square kilometers) above the record low September extent set in 2007.

  • On the opposite pole, sea ice extent typically reaches its annual maximum extent during September, but environmental conditions extended the ice growth season into October. The September Antarctic monthly average extent was 0.9 percent above the 1979–2000 average, the 14th largest (19th smallest) on record.

  • September brought a mix of wet and dry conditions around the globe. Tropical cyclones Talas and Roke impacted Japan and nearby regions with intensive precipitation; Nesat brought extremely heavy rainfall to the Philippines; and Irene and Lee drenched the northeastern United States. Irene also dumped heavy rain over the Dominican Republic. The southwest Asian monsoon brought heavy precipitation to Pakistan and eastern India. Other regions with much higher-than-normal precipitation included Colombia in South America and part of southeastern Africa around Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and Tanzania.

  • Below-average precipitation anomalies across the southern tier of the United States are indicative of an ongoing major drought conditions. It was also exceptionally dry across the western United States, much of eastern and southern South America, particularly eastern Brazil, much of central Asia, including nearly all of Mongolia, and much of Australia.

  • Spain experienced a much drier than normal September, with average rainfall across the country (16 mm / 0.63 in) about one-third of normal, making this month the driest September since 1988.

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20111013_globalstats.html

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2011 at 12:08pm

U.S. dealt another La Nina winter but 'wild card' could trump it

Devastating drought in Southern Plains likely to continue

October 20, 2011

Winter%20Outlook%20Temperature

(Credit: NOAA)

The Southern Plains should prepare for continued drier and warmer than average weather, while the Pacific Northwest is likely to be colder and wetter than average from December through February, according to the annual Winter Outlook released today by NOAA.

For the second winter in a row, La Nina will influence weather patterns across the country, but as usual, it’s not the only climate factor at play. The 'wild card' is the lesser-known and less predictable Arctic Oscillation that could produce dramatic short-term swings in temperatures this winter.

NOAA expects La Nina, which returned in August, to gradually strengthen and continue through the upcoming winter. It is associated with cooler than normal water temperatures in the tropical Pacific Ocean and influences weather throughout the world.

 "The evolving La Nina will shape this winter," said Mike Halpert, deputy director of NOAA's Climate Prediction Center. "There is a wild card, though. The erratic Arctic Oscillation can generate strong shifts in the climate patterns that could overwhelm or amplify La Nina's typical impacts."

The Arctic Oscillation is always present and fluctuates between positive and negative phases. The negative phase of the Arctic Oscillation pushes cold air into the U.S. from Canada. The Arctic Oscillation went strongly negative at times the last two winters, causing outbreaks of cold and snowy conditions in the U.S. such as the “Snowmaggedon” storm of 2009.  Strong Arctic Oscillation episodes typically last a few weeks and are difficult to predict more than one to two weeks in advance.

Winter%20Outlook%20Precipitation

(Credit: NOAA)

With La Nina in place Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and parts of surrounding states are unlikely to get enough rain to alleviate the ongoing drought. Texas, the epicenter of the drought, experienced its driest 12-month period on record from October 2010 through September 2011.

Stormy periods can occur anytime during the winter season. To improve the ability to predict and track winter storms, NOAA implemented a more accurate weather forecast model on Oct.18.  Data gathered from the model will support local weather forecast office efforts to prepare for and protect the public from weather events. This service is helping the country to become a Weather-Ready Nation at a time when extreme weather is on the rise.

According to the U.S. Winter Outlook (December through February) odds tilt in favor of:

  • Pacific Northwest:  colder and wetter than average. La Nina often results in below-average temperatures and increased mountain snow in the Pacific Northwest and western Montana during the winter months. This may set the stage for spring flooding in the Missouri River Basin;
  • California: colder than average and wetter than average conditions in northern California and drier than average conditions in southern California.  All of the southern part of the nation are at risk of having above normal wildfire conditions starting this winter and lasting into the spring;
  • Northern Plains: colder and wetter than average.  Spring flooding could be a concern in parts of this region;
  • Southern Plains and Gulf Coast States: warmer and drier than average. This will likely exacerbate drought conditions in these regions;
  • Florida and south Atlantic Coast: drier than average, with an equal chance for above-, near-, or below-normal temperatures. Above normal wildfire conditions;
  • Ohio and Tennessee Valleys: wetter than average with equal chances for above-, near-, or below-average temperatures. Potential for increased storminess and flooding;
  • Northeast and Mid-Atlantic: equal chances for above-, near-, or below-normal temperatures and precipitation. Winter weather for these regions is often driven not by La Nina but by the Arctic Oscillation. If enough cold air and moisture are in place, areas north of the Ohio Valley and into the Northeast could see above-average snow;
  • Great Lakes: colder and wetter than average;
  • Hawaii: above-average temperatures in the western islands with above normal precipitation during the winter.  Some drought recovery is expected across the state with Kauai and Oahu having the best potential for full recovery.
  • Alaska: colder than average over the southern half of the state and the panhandle with below average precipitation in the interior eastern part of the state.

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20111020_winteroutlook.html

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 01 2011 at 10:54am
So what does 5000+ miles per hour look like   (New NPP Launch-NASA)
 
New Weather and Climate Satelite (NOAA-NASA)
 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 12 2011 at 11:24am

NOAA greenhouse gas index continues climbing

November 9, 2011

Patricia%20Lang.

NOAA's Patricia Lang prepares to measure greenhouse gas levels inside a flask that is part of NOAA's global air sampling network. Network measurements, made from remote sites around the world, are critical to NOAA's Annual Greenhouse Gas Index, an annual measure of the heating effect of greenhouse gases added to the atmosphere by human activities. (Credit: NOAA)

NOAA�s updated Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI), which measures the direct climate influence of many greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane, shows a continued steady upward trend that began with the Industrial Revolution of the 1880s.

Started in 2004, the AGGI reached 1.29 in 2010. That means the combined heating effect of long-lived greenhouse gases added to the atmosphere by human activities has increased by 29 percent since 1990, the �index� year used as a baseline for comparison. This is slightly higher than the 2009 AGGI, which was 1.27, when the combined heating effect of those additional greenhouse gases was 27 percent higher than in 1990.

�The increasing amounts of long-lived greenhouse gases in our atmosphere indicate that climate change is an issue society will be dealing with for a long time,� said Jim Butler, director of the Global Monitoring Division of NOAA�s Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colo. �Climate warming has the potential to affect most aspects of society, including water supplies, agriculture, ecosystems and economies. NOAA will continue to monitor these gases into the future to further understand the impacts on our planet.�

The AGGI is analogous to the dial on an electric blanket � that dial does not tell you exactly how hot you will get, nor does the AGGI predict a specific temperature. Yet just as turning the dial up increases the heat of an electric blanket, a rise in the AGGI means greater greenhouse warming.

VIDEO:%20NOAA%20greenhouse%20gas%20index%20continues%20climbing.

VIDEO: NOAA greenhouse gas index continues climbing. View YouTube video (Credit: NOAA)

NOAA scientists created the AGGI recognizing that carbon dioxide is not the only greenhouse gas affecting the balance of heat in the atmosphere. Many other long-lived gases also contribute to warming, although not currently as much as carbon dioxide.

The AGGI includes methane and nitrous oxide, for example, greenhouse gases that are emitted by human activities and also have natural sources and sinks. It also includes several chemicals known to deplete Earth�s protective ozone layer, which are also active as greenhouse gases. The 2010 AGGI reflects several changes in the concentration of these gases, including:

  • A continued steady increase in carbon dioxide: Global carbon dioxide levels rose to an average of 389 parts per million in 2010, compared with 386 ppm in 2009, and 354 in the index or comparison year of 1990. Before the Industrial Revolution of the 1880s, carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere was about 280 ppm. Carbon dioxide levels swing up and down in natural seasonal cycles, but human activities � primarily the burning of coal, oil, and gas for transportation and power � have driven a consistent upward trend in concentration. 
  • A continued recent increase in methane: Methane levels rose in 2010 for the fourth consecutive year after remaining nearly constant for the preceding 10 years, up to 1799 parts per billion. Methane measured 1794 ppb in 2009, and 1714 ppb in 1990. Pound for pound, methane is 25 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, but there�s less of it in the atmosphere.
NOAA's Annual Greenhouse Gas Index is a gauge of the climate warming influence of greenhouse gases added to the atmosphere by human activities and compared with the "index" year of 1990. The AGGI shows a steady upward trend, reaching 1.29 in 2010. This means that the heating effect of additional greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has increased by 29 percent since 1990   (Credit: NOAA)
  • A continued steady increase in nitrous oxide: Best known as laughing gas in dentistry, nitrous oxide is also a greenhouse gas emitted from natural sources and as a byproduct of agricultural fertilization, livestock manure, sewage treatment and some industrial processes.
  • A continued recent drop in two chlorofluorocarbons, CFC11 and CFC12: Levels of these two compounds � which are ozone-depleting chemicals in addition to greenhouse gases � have been dropping at about one percent per year since the late 1990s, because of an international agreement, the Montreal Protocol, to protect the ozone layer.

Scientists at NOAA�s Earth System Research Laboratory prepare the AGGI each year from atmospheric data collected through an international cooperative air sampling network of more than 100 sites around the world.

 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 17 2011 at 9:42am

NOAA: Global temperatures 8th warmest on record for October

Strengthened La Nina conditions expected through winter

November 15, 2011


Global surface temperature Anomalies - October 2011. (Credit: NOAA)

The globe experienced its eighth warmest October since record keeping began in 1880. Arctic sea ice extent was the second smallest extent on record for October at 23.5 percent below average. Additionally, La Ni�a conditions strengthened during October 2011. According to NOAA�s Climate Prediction Center, La Nina is expected to continue through the Northern Hemisphere winter.

This monthly analysis from NOAA's National Climatic Data Center is part of the suite of climate services NOAA provides government, business and community leaders so they can make informed decisions.

Global temperature highlights: October

  • The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for October 2011 was the eighth warmest on record at 58.14 F (14.58 C), which is 1.04 F (0.58 C) above the 20th century average of 57.1 F (14.0 C). The margin of error associated with this temperature is +/- 0.13 F (0.07 C).

  • The global land surface temperature was 1.98 F (1.10 C) above the 20th century average of 48.7 F (9.3 C), making this the 2nd warmest October on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.20 F (0.11 C). Warmer-than-average conditions occurred across Alaska, Canada, most of Europe and Russia, and Mongolia. Cooler-than-average regions included the southeastern United States, most of southern and western South America, parts of Algeria and Libya, part of Eastern Europe, and far southeast Asia.

  • The global ocean surface temperature was 0.70 F (0.39 C) above the 20th century average of 60.6 F (15.9 C), making it the 11th warmest October on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.07 F (0.04 C). The warmth was most pronounced across the north central and northwest Pacific, the northeast Atlantic, and portions of the mid-latitude Southern oceans.

  • The United Kingdom marked its warmest October since 2006 and eighth warmest in the last 100 years, at 3.6 F (2.0 C) above the 1971�2000 average.

  • Several locations in Argentina experienced their coolest October in five decades.

Global significant events for October 2011. (Credit: NOAA)

Global temperature highlights: Year to date

  • The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for the January � October period was 0.95 F (0.53 C) above the 20th century average of 57.4 F (14.0 C), making it the 10th warmest such period on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.16 F (0.09 C).

  • The January - October worldwide land surface temperature was 1.53 F (0.85 C) above the 20th century average, the sixth warmest such period on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.34 F (0.19 C). The global ocean surface temperature for the year to date was 0.74 F (0.41 C) above the 20th century average and was the 12th warmest such period on record. The margin of error is +/-0.07 F (0.04 C).

  • La Nina conditions strengthened during October 2011. According to NOAA's Climate Prediction Center, La Nina is expected to continue through the Northern Hemisphere winter 2011/2012.

  • Monthly rainfall across Spain was 35 percent below average, the driest October since 1998.

Polar Sea Ice and Precipitation Highlights

  • The average Arctic sea ice extent during October was 23.5 percent below average, ranking as the second smallest October extent since satellite records began in 1979. The extent was 846,000 square miles (2.19 million square kilometers) below average and 127,000 square miles (330,000 square kilometers) larger than the record low October extent set in 2007.

  • On the opposite pole, the October Antarctic monthly average ice extent was 1.2 percent above the 1979-2000 average, the 12th largest on record.

  • Despite a record-breaking snowstorm in the US Northeast, Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent during October was below average, and ranked as the 15th smallest October snow cover extent in the 44-year period of record. The North America and Eurasian land areas both had below-average snow cover during the month.

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2011/20111115_globalstats.html

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2011 at 7:20am

Arctic changing 'at record pace': study

 
An international team of 121 scientists has found "record-setting" change in the Arctic linked to global warming, including melting ice, warming waters and changing wind patterns.

The 2011 Arctic Report Card, compiled by scientists from 14 countries, "shows that record-setting changes are occurring throughout the Arctic environmental system.

"Given the projection of continued global warming, it is very likely that major Arctic changes will continue in years to come, with increasing climatic, biological and social impacts," the report said.

The authors of the annual report -- first released in 2006 -- said there is now sufficient data to indicate a "persistent decline in the thickness and summer extent of the sea ice cover, and a warmer, fresher upper ocean."

Average temperatures over much of the Arctic have risen some 2.5 degrees F (1.5 degrees C) from a 1981-2010 baseline, and the minimum area of sea ice recorded this year, in September 2011, was the second lowest since 1979.

The "profound and continuing" changes have had an uneven impact on Arctic wildlife, threatening the icy habitats of polar bears and walruses but giving whales greater access to northern feeding areas, the report said.

The warming has also caused new vegetation to sprout in many areas, and has led to a 20 percent increase in phytoplankton, microscopic organisms that are the basis of the oceanic food chain.

The report also found that changes in Arctic winter wind patterns first detected in 2010 have continued.

"The Arctic region continues to warm, with less sea ice and greater green vegetation," said Monica Medina, of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

 
 
________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 

Thawing permafrost vents gases to worsen warming

By SETH BORENSTEIN

WASHINGTON (AP) - Massive amounts of greenhouse gases trapped below thawing permafrost will likely seep into the air over the next several decades, accelerating and amplifying global warming, scientists warn.

Those heat-trapping gases under the frozen Arctic ground may be a bigger factor in global warming than the cutting down of forests, and a scenario that climate scientists hadn't quite accounted for, according to a group of permafrost experts. The gases won't contribute as much as pollution from power plants, cars, trucks and planes, though.

The permafrost scientists predict that over the next three decades a total of about 45 billion metric tons of carbon from methane and carbon dioxide will seep into the atmosphere when permafrost thaws during summers. That's about the same amount of heat-trapping gas the world spews during five years of burning coal, gas and other fossil fuels

And the picture is even more alarming for the end of the century. The scientists calculate that about than 300 billion metric tons of carbon will belch from the thawing Earth from now until 2100.

Adding in that gas means that warming would happen "20 to 30 percent faster than from fossil fuel emissions alone," said Edward Schuur of the University of Florida. "You are significantly speeding things up by releasing this carbon."

Usually the first few to several inches of permafrost thaw in the summer, but scientists are now looking at up to 10 feet of soft unfrozen ground because of warmer temperatures, he said. The gases come from decaying plants that have been stuck below frozen ground for millennia.

Schuur and 40 other scientists in the Permafrost Carbon Research Network met this summer and jointly wrote up their findings, which were published in the journal Nature on Wednesday.

"The survey provides an important warning that global climate warming is likely to be worse than expected," said Jay Zwally, a NASA polar scientist who wasn't part of the study. "Arctic permafrost has been like a wild card."

When the Nobel Prize-winning panel of climate scientists issued its last full report in 2007, it didn't even factor in trapped methane and carbon dioxide from beneath the permafrost. Diplomats are meeting this week in South Africa to find ways of curbing human-made climate change.

Schuur and others said increasing amounts of greenhouse gas are seeping out of permafrost each year. Some is methane, which is 25 times stronger than carbon dioxide in trapping heat.

In a recent video, University of Alaska Fairbanks professor Katey Walter Anthony, a study co-author, is shown setting leaking methane gas on fire with flames shooting far above her head.

"Places like that are all around," Anthony said in a phone interview. "We're tapping into old carbon that has been locked up in the ground for 30,000 to 40,000 years."

That triggers what Anthony and other scientists call a feedback cycle. The world warms, mostly because of human-made greenhouse gases. That thaws permafrost, releasing more natural greenhouse gas, augmenting the warming.

There are lots of unknowns and a large margin of error because this is a relatively new issue with limited data available, the scientists acknowledge.

"It's very much a seat-of-the-pants expert assessment," said Stanford University's Chris Field, who wasn't involved in the new report.

The World Meteorological Organization this week said the worst of the warming in 2011 was in the northern areas - where there is permafrost - and especially Russia. Since 1970, the Arctic has warmed at a rate twice as fast as the rest of the globe.

The thawing permafrost also causes trees to lean - scientists call them "drunken trees" - and roads to buckle. Study co-author F. Stuart Chapin III said when he first moved to Fairbanks the road from his house to the University of Alaska had to be resurfaced once a decade.

"Now it gets resurfaced every year due to thawing permafrost," Chapin said.

 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 13 2012 at 7:09am

January 2012 the fourth warmest for the contiguous United States

Locations across Alaska record cold for the month

 (Credit: NOAA)

During January, warmer-than-average conditions enveloped most of the contiguous United States, with widespread below-average precipitation. The overall weather pattern for the month was reflected in the lack of snow for much of the Northern Plains, Midwest, and Northeast. This scenario was in stark contrast to Alaska where several towns had their coldest January on record.

This monthly analysis from NOAA is part of the suite of climate services we provide government, business and community leaders so they can make informed decisions.

The average contiguous U.S. temperature in January was 36.3 degrees F, 5.5 degrees F above the 1901-2000 long-term average -- the fourth warmest January on record, and the warmest since 2006. Precipitation, averaged across the nation, was 1.85 inches. This was 0.37 inch below the long-term average, with variability between regions.

U.S. Climate Highlights � January

  • Warmer-than-average temperatures were widespread across the contiguous United States during January. Nine states - Arizona, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Wyoming � had January temperatures ranking among their ten warmest. Florida and Washington were the only states with temperatures near average, and no state was cooler than average.
  • Many locations across the Northern Plains exceeded all-time warm January maximum temperatures records during the month, including Minot, North Dakota, which reached 61 degrees F on January 5th. This surpassed the previous record of 59.0 degrees F for the city, set on January 28th, 1906.
  • In contrast to the contiguous United States being much warmer than average, several towns across Alaska had their coldest average January temperatures on record -- Nome (-16.6 degrees F), Bethel (-17.3 degrees F) McGrath (-28.5 degrees F), and Bettles (-35.6 degrees F).
  • Precipitation totals were mixed across the United States during January. The Southern Plains and the Great Lakes were wetter than average for the month, with Texas having above-average precipitation for the second month in a row. Texas had not experienced two consecutive months with above-average precipitation since January-February 2010.
  • Below-average precipitation was observed for the Central Plains, where Kansas had its third driest January, and Nebraska its eighth. The Southeast was also drier than average, where Florida had its eighth driest January on record. Many locations along Florida�s Atlantic coast, which usually averages over 2.5 inches of precipitation during January, had little to no precipitation during the month.
  • Cities across the Northern Plains, Midwest, and Northeast had below-average snow fall during the month � a result of warmer and drier than average conditions. According to data from the Rutgers Global Snow Lab, the average snow extent during January was 1.0 million square miles, which was 329,000 square miles below the 1981-2010 average. This marks the 3rd smallest January snow cover extent in the 46-year period of record.

U.S. Climate Highlights � Winter to Date (December 2011-January 2012)

  • The first two months of the winter season, December and January, have been much warmer than average for the contiguous United States. The two-month period was the fourth warmest on record with an average temperature 3.8 degrees F above average. Much of the warmth was anchored across the northern and eastern United States. Minnesota was record warm for the period, with an average temperature 10.1 degrees F above average. A total of twenty-two states from Montana to Maine had December-January temperatures ranking among their ten warmest.
  • Despite a large winter storm which impacted the western U.S. during January, much of the region was drier than average. California had its fourth driest December-January period, and Montana had its sixth. Wetter-than-average conditions were observed in a string of states from New Mexico to New York, with Texas having its eleventh wettest two-month period.

U.S. Climate Highlights � Last 12 months (February 2011-January 2012)

  • The 12-month period, ending in January, was the sixth warmest such period for the contiguous United States, with warmer-than-average temperatures dominating the eastern two-thirds of the nation. Seven states - Delaware, New Jersey, North Carolina, Maryland, Rhode Island, Texas, and Virginia - were record warm for the period, while an additional 18 states had 12-month temperatures ranking among their ten warmest. Oregon and Washington were the only states with below-average temperatures during the period.
  • The nationally-averaged precipitation total for the 12-month period was near average, masking regional extremes. The Ohio Valley and Northeast were record wet for the period, with seven states within those regions also being record wet. Dry conditions were present along the southern tier of the nation from New Mexico to South Carolina.

http://www.noaa.gov/features/02_monitoring/jan_stats.html

 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 02 2012 at 1:46pm

Oceans Acidifying Fastest in 300 Million Years

By Alex Morales - Mar 2, 2012 4:43 AM MTFri Mar 02 11:43:01 GMT 2012
Oceans absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, changing their pH and endangering marine life. Photograph: Justin Borucki/Image Source

The Earth's oceans may be acidifying faster than at any point during the last 300 million years due to industrial emissions, endangering marine life from oysters and reefs to sea-going salmon, researchers said.

The scientists found surging levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere forced down the pH of the ocean by 0.1 unit in the last century, 10 times faster than the closest historical comparison from 56 million years ago, New York�s Columbia University, which led the research, said yesterday in a statement. The seas absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, forming carbonic acid. The lower the pH level in the seas, the more acidic they are.

Past instances of ocean acidification have been linked with mass extinctions of marine creatures so the current one could also threaten important species, according to Baerbel Hoenisch, the paleoceanographer at Columbia who was lead author of the paper that appeared in the journal Science.

"If industrial carbon emissions continue at the current pace, we may lose organisms we care about - coral reefs, oysters, salmon," Hoenisch said.

The UN�s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said ocean pH may fall another 0.3 units this century, according to Columbia. The closest change to the current pace occurred during the so-called Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum about 56 million years ago, when a doubling of the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide may have pushed pH levels down by 0.45 units over 20,000 years, according to the researchers.

Fossil Records

Then, fossil records indicate as many as half of all species of seabed-dwelling single-celled creatures called benthic foraminifers went extinct, suggesting species higher up the food chain may also have died out, they said.

The scientists used fossil records including the preservation of calcium carbonate in ocean sediments and the concentrations of various elements to reconstruct past ocean conditions. Two other mass extinctions about 200 million years and 252 million years ago may also be linked to acidification, though there�s less fossil evidence, according to the study.

"Although similarities exist, no past event perfectly parallels future projections in terms of disrupting the balance of ocean carbonate chemistry - a consequence of the unprecedented rapidity of CO2 release currently taking place," the researchers wrote.

 
 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 02 2012 at 9:57pm
God always has had a plan for my life and I know he has a plan for the World. Maybe we need to have this heat because we could be coming up on to a Mini-Ice Age.   

There just may be a reason for the green-house gases. Since man seems not willing or able to cure green-house gases we may have to go with the flow. I trust in God!
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 03 2012 at 9:28am

NOAA-led study: Colorado oil and gas wells emit more pollutants than expected

Feb. 27, 2012  Contact: Katy Human, 303-497-4747

 
When NOAA scientists began routinely monitoring the atmosphere's composition at a tower north of Denver a few years ago, their instruments immediately sniffed something strange: plumes of air rich with chemical pollutants including the potent greenhouse gas methane.

Some of the pollutants picked up are known to damage air quality. Another, methane, is 25 times more effective per molecule than carbon dioxide at trapping heat in the atmosphere. The scientists were concerned. None of NOAA's other air composition monitoring towers - there are eight, in total, scattered around the continental United States - had recorded anything similar.
 
"So we set out to figure out where these chemicals were coming from, by going from the tower measurements 1,000 feet high up, down to the ground in a mobile laboratory," said Gabrielle Petron, Ph.D., an atmospheric scientist with NOAA's Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) and the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES).

Petron and co-workers customized
air sampling devices and atmospheric chemistry instruments and headed out to northeastern Colorado, downwind of possible sources to collect chemical "fingerprints" that would help identify the possible sources.

After taking dozens of samples and thousands of readings
along rural roads, near oil and gas equipment, landfills, and animal feeding operations, the research team has an answer: The unusual air pollutants seen at the Denver tower came primarily from oil and gas production in northeastern Colorado's Weld County.

"We found gas operations in the region leaked about twice as much methane into the atmosphere as previously estimated," Petron said. "And the oil and gas infrastructure was leaking other air pollutants, too, including benzene, which is regulated because of its toxicity."

Petron is lead author in a paper published online in the Journal of Geophysical Research this week.

In 2008, the year most of the data were collected, Weld County had nearly 14,000 operating oil and gas wells.

The research team's chemical fingerprinting work showed that oil and gas equipment and activities - well pads equipment including condensate storage tanks, pipelines, compressors and more - leaked or vented an estimated 4 percent of all natural gas produced to the atmosphere. That loss is about double the previous best-guess estimate, based on engineering calculations and industry data, of about 2 percent loss.

"We may have been significantly underestimating methane emissions by this industry in this region," Petron said.

The team also found that emissions of benzene, a known carcinogen, are underestimated. Benzene is tracked and regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Petron and her colleagues found evidence of at least two sources of benzene in the region: oil and gas operations and something else, most likely cars and trucks on roads. And the new study found benzene emissions from oil and gas operations in the region to be significantly higher than expected, between 385 and 2,055 metric tons in 2008, compared with earlier estimates ranging from about 60 to 145 per year.

Finally, the researchers' findings suggest that oil and gas-related emissions of more reactive volatile organic compounds, which contribute to lung-damaging ozone pollution, are also underestimated. More reactive VOCs were not directly measured in the 2008 study, but are almost certainly co-emitted with methane and larger alkanes. According to the EPA, the northern Front Range has been out of compliance with federal health-based standards in the summer since 2007.

Chemist Greg Frost, Ph.D. also with NOAA and CIRES and a co-author of the new study, said the work demonstrates the value of studying emissions from several perspectives. Top-down studies (such as from the tall tower) can complement and verify bottom-up approaches (such as estimates based on average leak rates at pipe junctions).

"What Gabrielle has done is to use the mobile laboratory and tower data to make top-down estimates of emissions, which can be used to evaluate the bottom-up estimates from industry and regulatory agencies," Frost said. "This is going to inspire a lot more research."

 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
jacksdad View Drop Down
Executive Admin
Executive Admin
Avatar

Joined: September 08 2007
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Points: 47251
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jacksdad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 03 2012 at 10:17am
There's no doubt in my mind that humans are causing climate change. You make a change in a system, the system changes. It's just basic high school science - cause and effect. You pump up CO2 in the atmosphere, you'll see a change. If you don't believe it, stick around. Denying it won't stop it, but go ahead if it makes you feel better.

We're seeing unprecedented changes in our world, and we can't even begin to understand the links between all the components that make it up. If we're lucky we won't initiate something truly catastrophic, like turning off the thermohaline circulation (THC) conveyor belt that stops the northeastern states and northern Europe from resembling Alaska, and the southern oceans warming and spawning more powerful monsoons.

We get most of our food from a few key locations - the so-called bread baskets and rice bowls of the world. Favorable weather conditions were key to their location, and if these areas started to see more or less rain, shorter growing seasons, etc, we'd be forced to relocate entire regions that took many generations to become established in the first place. By the middle of this century population projections indicate we'll need to increase food production by 70% just to keep up, and that's not going to happen. We're talking about three or four decades before we're going to be looking at food shortages even without any disruption to farming as we know it. That's well within our children's lifetime, and close enough that some of us will be seeing it too.

I don't think we'll change as a species and fix things in time, but without a doubt we'll have change forced upon us. The thin envelope of gas and water that covers this planet doesn't know we exist or even care about us. It's an unthinking system controlled by physical laws and it'll move the weather around irrespective of our needs and wants. When we can't feed ourselves anymore at the population level we've artificially sustained we'll die back as a species. We won't become extinct, but hopefully we'll learn this time around and not screw things up as badly next time. Fingers crossed...
"Buy it cheap. Stack it deep"
"Any community that fails to prepare, with the expectation that the federal government will come to the rescue, will be tragically wrong." Michael Leavitt, HHS Secretary.
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2012 at 11:25am

U.S. records warmest March; more than 15,000 warm temperature records broken

First quarter of 2012 also warmest on record; early March tornado outbreak is year's first "billion dollar disaster"

Record and near-record breaking temperatures dominated the eastern two-thirds of the nation and contributed to the warmest March on record for the contiguous United States, a record that dates back to 1895. More than 15,000 warm temperature records were broken during the month.

The average temperature of 51.1 F was 8.6 degrees above the 20th century average for March and 0.5 F warmer than the previous warmest March in 1910. Of the more than 1,400 months (117+ years) that have passed since the U.S. climate record began, only one month, January 2006, has seen a larger departure from its average temperature than March 2012.

Note: The March 2012 Monthly Climate Report for the United States has several pages of supplemental information and data regarding the unprecedented early 2012 temperatures.

U.S. climate highlights - March

  •   Every state in the nation experienced at least one record warm daily temperature during March. According to preliminary data, there were 15,272 warm temperature records broken (7,755 daytime records, 7,517 nighttime records). Hundreds of locations across the country broke their all-time March records. There were 21 instances of the nighttime temperatures being as warm, or warmer, than the existing record daytime temperature for a given date.

  •   A persistent weather pattern led to 25 states east of the Rockies having their warmest March on record. An additional 15 states had monthly temperatures ranking among their ten warmest. That same pattern brought cooler-than-average conditions to the West Coast states of Washington, Oregon, and California.
  • Temperatures in Alaska during March, which are not included in the contiguous U.S. average value, ranked as the tenth coolest on record.
  • The nationally-averaged precipitation total was 2.73 inches, which is 0.33 inches above average. The Pacific Northwest and the Southern Plains were much wetter than average during March while drier-than-average conditions prevailed in the interior West, Northeast, and Florida. Colorado had its driest March on record.

  • According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, as of April 3rd, 36.8 percent of the contiguous U.S. was in drought, a decrease from 38.7 percent at the end of February and an increase from 28.8 percent a year ago on April 5, 2011. Above-average precipitation across the Southern Plains improved long-term drought conditions Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas.
  • Warmer-than-average conditions across the eastern U.S. also created an environment favorable for severe thunderstorms and tornadoes. According to NOAA's Storm Prediction Center, there were 223 preliminary tornado reports during March, a month that averages 80 tornadoes annually. The majority of the tornadoes occurred during the March 2nd-3rd outbreak across the Ohio Valley and Southeast, which caused 40 fatalities. Total losses from this event are estimated to exceed $1.5 billion dollars, making this the first event of 2012 to exceed one billion dollars in damages and losses.
  • On March 9, a large weather system impacted the Hawaiian Islands, bringing extreme rainfall and severe thunderstorms. A rare EF-0 tornado hit the towns of Lanikai and Kailua on Oahu, causing minor damage. A hailstone with the largest diameter on record for the state, measuring 4¼ inches, fell on Oahu during this event.

Year-to-date (January-March)

  • The first three months of 2012 were also record warm for the contiguous United States with an average temperature of 42.0°F, 6.0°F above the long-term average.
  • Twenty-five states, all east of the Rockies, had their warmest first quarter on record, and an additional 16 states had first-quarter temperatures ranking among their ten warmest.
  • Numerous cities had a record warm January-March, including Chicago, Boston, and Washington, D.C. No state in the contiguous U.S. had below-average January-March temperatures.
  • Alaska had its ninth coolest January-March period; temperatures were 5.2°F below average.
  • The nationally-averaged precipitation total for January-March was 0.29 inches below the long-term average. States across the Pacific Northwest and Southern Plains were wetter than average, while the Intermountain West, parts of the Ohio Valley, and the entire Eastern Seaboard were drier than average.
  • NOAA's U.S. Climate Extremes Index, an index that tracks the highest 10 percent and lowest 10 percent of extremes in temperature, precipitation, drought and tropical cyclones, was 39 percent, nearly twice the long-term average and the highest value on record for the January-March period. The predominant factor was the large area experiencing extremes in warm daily maximum and minimum temperatures.

Cold season (October-March) and 12-month period (April 2011-May 2012)

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/summary-info/national/2012/3

__________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Missed Febuary Post
 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
quietone View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 112
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote quietone Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2012 at 8:00pm
 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

National Climatic Data Center

March global temperatures were coolest since 1999

(Despite US records of warmest March)

Month ranks 16th warmest March for globe; La Niña expected to dissipate by the end of April

The average global temperature for March 2012 made it the coolest March since 1999, yet the 16th warmest since record keeping began in 1880. Arctic sea ice extent during the month was below average but was the largest extent since 2008 and one of the largest March extents of the past decade. Additionally, La Niña conditions continued to weaken during March as temperatures across the equatorial Pacific Ocean warmed during the last two months. According to NOAA's Climate Prediction Center, La Niña is expected to dissipate by the end of April 2012.

Global temperature highlights: March

  • The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for March 2012 was the 16th warmest March record and the coolest since 1999 at 55.73°F (13.16°C), which is 0.83°F (0.46°C) above the 20th century average of 54.9°F (12.7°C). The margin of error associated with this temperature is ±0.13°F (0.07°C).

  • The global land-only surface temperature was 1.31°F (0.73°C) above the 20th century average of 40.8°F (5.0°C), making it the 18th warmest March on record and the coolest global land-only March temperature anomaly since 2003. The margin of error is ±0.23°F (0.13°C).
  • Warmer-than-average conditions occurred across nearly all of Canada, the contiguous United States, Mexico, Europe, Argentina, Peru, and parts of northern and central Russia, India, China, and eastern Brazil. Cooler-than-average regions included Alaska, Australia, eastern and western Russia, and parts of New Zealand.
  • Norway experienced its warmest March since national records began in 1900, while Australia had its third coolest March maximum temperature since national temperature records began in 1950.

  • The United States also experienced its warmest March, with more than 15,000 warm temperature records broken and the average temperature of the lower 48 states being 51.1°F, 8.6°F above the 20th century average for March.
  • For the ocean, the March global sea surface temperature was 0.63°F (0.35°C) above the 20th century average of 60.7°F (15.9°C), tying with 1988 and 1990 as the 14th warmest March on record and coolest since 2008. The margin of error is ±0.07°F (0.04°C). The warmth was most pronounced across the north central Pacific, the North Atlantic, much of the eastern Indian Ocean, and portions of the mid-latitude Southern oceans.

Global temperature highlights: Year to date

  • The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for the first three months of the year (January–March) period was 0.70°F (0.39°C) above the 20th century average of 54.1°F (12.3°C), tying with 1991 as the 21st warmest such period on record and the coolest since 1996. The margin of error is ±0.16°F (0.09°C).
  • The January–March worldwide land surface temperature was 0.95°F (0.53°C) above the 20th century average of 38.5°F (3.7°C), the 27th warmest such period on record and the coolest since 1996. The margin of error is ±0.40°F (0.22°C). The global ocean surface temperature for the year to date was 0.61°F (0.34°C) above the 20th century average of 60.6°F (15.9°C), tying with 1995 as the 14th warmest such period on record and the coolest since 2008. The margin of error is ±0.07°F (0.04°C).

Polar sea ice and precipitation highlights

  • The average Arctic sea ice extent during March 2012 was 3.4 percent below average, ranking ninth smallest March extent since satellite records began in 1979. This is the largest March Arctic sea ice extent since 2008 and one of the largest March extents of the past decade. Arctic sea ice reached its annual maximum extent on March 18th, 12 days later than average.
    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/nh-seaice/201203.gif
    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/sh-seaice/201203.gif
    Arctic and Antarctic sea ice extent, from the March 2012 Global Snow & Ice Report
  • On the opposite pole, Antarctic sea ice during March was 16.0 percent above average and ranked fourth largest March extent in the 34-year period of record.
  • The Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent during March 2012 was near the long-term average for March, with variability between North American and Eurasia. The North American snow cover extent was much below average, ranking as fourth smallest March snow extent on record. Eurasian snow cover for March was 1.1 million square km above average, or the ninth largest March snow extent.
  • Precipitation varied across the globe during March. Dryness prevailed across much of Europe during March. Germany reported its third driest March since national records began in 1881 and Spain reported its driest March since 1997. Other areas that had significant below-average precipitation included eastern Brazil, the eastern United States, southern South America, parts of western and southeastern Africa, and southern and southeastern Asia. Rainfall was much heavier than average across Australia, resulting in the fourth wettest March in the nation’s 113-year record. This rainfall was associated in part with La Niña.

Included in this report: NOAA is now making it easier to find information about margins of error associated with its global temperature calculations. NCDC previously displayed this information in certain graphics associated with the report, but it will now publish these ranges in the form of "plus or minus" values associated with each monthly temperature calculation. These values are calculated using techniques published in peer-reviewed scientific literature

 
Swish
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2012 at 10:50pm
Thanks quitone for updating end of the month global, I fixed a couple of the graphics so they could be read.
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2012 at 5:11pm
La Nina fading, likely gone by end of April

globes%20of%20SST%20anomaly%20in%20the%20Pacific%20on%20January%2012,%202012,%20and%20April%2015,%202012

Sea surface temperatures in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean swing back and forth every few years (sometimes more) like an irregular pendulum. The warm phase is known as El Ni�o; the cool phase�which it has been in for the past two winters�is called La Nina. According to NOAA's April 2012 ENSO Diagnostics Discussion, La Ni�a is fading and will likely be over by the end of April.

The pair of maps shows the difference from average temperature in the tropical Pacific near the winter peak of the La Nina event on January 12 and on April 15. Places where the ocean was up to 5 degrees Celsius colder than the 1981-2010 average are dark blue, average temperatures are white, and places where temperatures were up to 5 degrees C warmer than average are red.

Although one climate pattern can't explain every bit of wacky weather that happens on Earth, when it comes to making seasonal forecasts, the occurrence of an El Ni�o or La Ni�a event is the single most useful predictor that climate scientists have for forecasting if seasonal precipitation and temperature are likely to be above or below normal.

By studying past La Nina and El Nino episodes, scientists have detected predictable rainfall and temperature patterns that often occur from one episode to the next. La Ni�a winters, for example, have a high probability of being colder and wetter (or snowier) than normal in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, and warmer and drier in the Southeast. On the far side of the Pacific, La Nina is usually accompanied by heavier than normal rainfall and cooler than usual temperatures in eastern Australia.

With La Nina fading, forecasts for the rest of spring and summer are likely to be less confident, with factors such as current soil moisture and long-term trends providing weaker hints as to what the climate over the next few seasons will be like.

 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2012 at 7:31am
Weather Derivatives: Hedging on Mother Nature
Apr 19, 2012 ||Adam Clements
 
red_umbrella

For some industries, the weather plays a significant role in determining revenue. Unexpected weather events can often cause significant financial losses. For instance, a drought can yield a severe impact on an agribusiness amount and quality of produce; unseasonably mild winters can similarly diminish the profit margins of utility companies. So, how can companies - particularly those at the mercy of Mother Nature - protect themselves against the elements and limit their exposure to financial risk?

Increasingly, companies have been managing weather risk by using derivatives, which provide the means for businesses to protect themselves against adverse financial affects that are due to variations in climate. According to industry body, the Weather Risk Management Association, trading volume of weather derivatives in 2010-2011 increased by 20 percent on the previous year.

How it Works

Derivative contracts generally represent a contract to trade a specified quantity of an underlying asset, at an agreed price and time. By making a payment to a separate company that will assume the financial weather risk for them, organizations are buying a type of insurance: the company assuming the risk will pay the purchaser a pre-set amount of money that will correspond to the loss or cost increase caused by the disruptive weather. As such, risk exposure can be managed in a wide range of settings.

Weather derivatives derive their value from climatic conditions such as temperature, snowfall, hurricanes or rainfall. An important set of contracts traded at CME Group are temperature-based futures contracts. Contracts are offered for trade based on the temperature across a range of U.S., European and Australian cities such as Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne.

The most common of these contracts come in the form of either Heating Degree Day (HDD) or Cooling Degree Day (CDD) contracts. The payoff of these contracts is based on the cumulated difference in daily temperatures relative to 18�C (about 64�F) over a fixed period such as a month. The fixed level of 18�C is the temperature at which the energy sector believes little heating or cooling occurs in households. The buyer of a HDD or CDD contract benefits from a positive payoff if cumulative temperature is below or above a specified level. While this nomenclature may seem counter-intuitive, heating (or cooling) occurs when temperatures are lower (higher).

Major participants in this market include utilities and insurance companies, whose costs and or revenues are dependent upon weather conditions. In an Australian setting, an electricity supplier normally provides its customers with electricity at a fixed price irrespective of the wholesale price in the National Electricity Market. However, the wholesale price of electricity can fluctuate wildly with extreme weather conditions. CDD contracts can provide a hedging tool for such fluctuations in electricity prices in the wholesale market during periods of extremely high temperatures. Similar arguments apply in the northern hemisphere, where utilities face risk from increased demand during periods of low temperatures and hence HDD contracts are a natural hedging tool.

Pricing Weather

Futures on traditional assets such as stocks, bonds, agricultural and most energy products are priced under the cost of carry approach. The logic of this approach is that there are two alternatives for obtaining the asset in question at some point in the future. These are either, borrow to purchase it now and store the asset, or agree to purchase the asset at that later date via a futures contract. Under the absence of arbitrage, the cost of both approaches should be equivalent. Hence the current cost of a futures contract is related to the current price of the asset and the cost of borrowing and storing the asset. This arbitrage-free valuation approach is a simple yet common method for pricing many financial securities.

Weather derivatives have also gained research attention in academic circles as they represent a unique pricing problem. The cost of carry method is based on the possibility of storing, or holding the underlying asset. However, in the case of weather contracts such as HDD or CDD, the underlying asset is not storable in any meaningful way.

As such, the cost of carry approach is not relevant and pricing is based on a discounted value of the payoff from the futures contract. A statistical model is required to generate the possible range of outcomes that the underlying weather index may take and subsequent payoffs ensuing from the derivatives contract. The discount rate will be market determined given the prices for contracts that the market will bear.

Weather derivatives are of great economic importance in that they allow participants to manage a very specific form of risk. While weather futures contracts currently make up a relatively small proportion of trading in derivatives markets, it is a sector that is experiencing rapid growth - particularly as more companies recognize the correlation between weather and profit.

This is an edited version of an article originally published at The Conversation.

 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 30 2012 at 11:38am
NASA/SDO/J. Major
____________________________________________________________________________________

Do solar storms cause heat waves on Earth?

April 2012

Although solar flares, and associated coronal mass ejections, can bombard Earth's outermost atmosphere with tremendous amounts of energy, most of that energy is reflected back into space by the Earth's magnetic field. Because the energy does not reach our planet's surface, it has no measurable influence on surface temperature.

The heat wave that affected the eastern and central United States in March 2012 coincided with a flurry of solar eruptions, and it's not unreasonable to wonder if such events are related. After all, the Sun's energy is the source of Earth's warmth.

But most of the energy released by solar storms like those on March 8-10 is not like the visible and ultraviolet light that penetrates Earth's atmosphere and warms the surface. Instead, solar storms hurl bursts of electrically charged particles through space, and the particles aimed at the Earth encounter our planet's magnetic field and upper atmosphere, the thermosphere.

The stream of energetic particles warms the thermosphere. Carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide, coolants in the thermosphere, absorb the energy and then re-radiate heat back into space. A small fraction of the extra heat from the solar flare radiates to layers of the atmosphere below the thermosphere, but it is miniscule compared to the normal amount of heating the lower layers of the atmosphere already experience from incoming visible and ultraviolet sunlight.

Solar flares don't cause heat waves, but they do have other impacts on Earth. Consequences include pretty auroras, as well as hazards. They can rain extra radiation on satellites, and increase the drag on satellites in low-Earth orbit. Increased electromagnetic activity due to solar storms can also disrupt power grids and radio communications. Passengers on commercial jets flying polar routes may be exposed to increased electromagnetic radiation.

Short-lived solar explosions don't influence weather events like the March 2012 heat wave, but longer-term variations in solar output might affect Earth's climate. The latter half of the seventeenth century experienced a decades-long stretch of minimal solar activity known as the Maunder Minimum, which many scientists suspect may have triggered the Little Ice Age-a cold spell that chilled the Northern Hemisphere from about 1650 to 1850.

Over the long term, however, multiple records indicate that the amount of energy the Earth receives from the Sun is quite stable. Astronomers have aimed telescopes at the Sun since the Scientific Revolution, and recent studies have reconstructed solar activity over the past three centuries. Satellites have observed the Sun since 1978, and found that solar activity varies on a roughly 11-year cycle by about one-tenth of one percent.

As for the solar storm in early March 2012, it released a substantial amount of energy, but almost all of it was re-radiated back into space, and very little penetrated the lower atmosphere. Martin Mlynczak, associate principal investigator for NASA's Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) instrument, says, "The extra energy from this storm is on the order of 100,000 times less than the energy we normally get at the Earth's surface. It's so small that you wouldn't even notice it."

http://www.climatewatch.noaa.gov/article/2012/do-solar-storms-cause-heat-waves-on-earth

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Other related Article (NASA)
____________________________________________________________________________
 
Addressing misinformation on this subject
 

 

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 03 2012 at 4:05pm
Nature Observation Database Receives One-Millionth Entry

Key database monitoring climate change received its one-millionth report from a network of "citizen scientists"

Photo%20of%20Lucille%20Tower%20examining%20a%20vine%20maple.

Lucille Tower submitted the one-millionth observation; here, she examines a vine maple.
Credit and Larger Version

May 3, 2012

On April 30, 2012, the USA National Phenology Network (NPN), partially funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), received its one-millionth nature observation from volunteers--many of whom are non-scientists or "citizen scientists." The observation will help understand the impacts of climate change on Earth's plants and animals.

Scientists and citizen volunteers contribute individual bits of data to NPN daily concerning phenology, the study of the timing of plant and animal responses--such as leafing, flowering, nesting, foliage changes, hibernation and migration--to seasonal changes.

Resource managers combine the data into an increasingly detailed record of how Earth's climate is evolving and how it might affect humans and Mother Nature down the road.

Hitting the one-millionth observation is exciting because researchers and decision-makers need more information to understand and respond to our rapidly changing planet," said Jake Weltzin, a U.S. Geological Survey scientist and executive director of NPN. "More information means better-informed decisions that ensure the continued vitality of our natural areas that we all depend on--and enjoy."

One millionth observation

Watching and reporting the flowering of a nearby vine maple, Acer circinatum, turned into the millionth observation submitted through NPN's online observation program, Nature's Notebook. Lucille Tower, an amateur scientist from Portland, Ore. submitted the record.

"Tower responded "yes" to the question on the NPN's observation submission form: "Did you see: One or more fresh open or unopened flowers or flower buds visible in the plant?" The record marked a precisely defined point in the life cycle of the vine maple, something that researchers observe while monitoring how climate change affects the start and end point of a plant's viability.

"We're excited about the quantity of observations and what it means for potentially answering the big questions," said Alyssa Rosemartin, NPN's assistant director.

"Our first records in the contemporary system are from Erin Lindquist, a professor at Meredith College, whose students collected thousands of records on deciduous tree phenology in North Carolina in the fall of 2008, and the millionth was submitted by a participant in Portland Budwatch, one of our partners that has set up several phenology trails and trained 100 observers in Portland. Look how far we've come."

Societal and economic benefits

The NPN provides a myriad of societal benefits by, for example, supporting the development of more accurate forecasts of the onset of allergy seasons; the spread of vector-borne diseases, such as lyme disease and West Nile virus; the movements of invasive plants; the development of drought conditions--information that could be used to help improve the health and welfare of large human populations, contribute to the management of water resources, wildlife and working farms and ranches, and maintain the vitality of ecosystems.

Weltzin says the NPN database also supports analyses of climate-change impacts that have important potential economic implications. Several examples:

  • NPN data is currently being used to help determine the chances of costly and destructive western wildfires.
  • The NPN recently established an Interagency Agreement with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to study patterns and trends occurring in the oceans, which could have profound implications for the multi-million-dollar U.S. fishing industry.
  • Pollination by native insects currently contributes more than $3 billion in agricultural crops each year. But climate-driven changes in the phenology of crops and native insects could change the effectiveness of insect pollination--for better or worse. NPN volunteers are currently observing insect and crop phenology together and thereby contributing to our understanding of related changes and helping to ensure the viability of crops across the United States.
  • NPN volunteers are currently tracking the leafing of sugar maple trees, which could contribute to improved predictions of sap runs and ultimately the production of maple syrup, which is important not only to pancake lovers but also to the economy of the New York/New England region.

Increasing the application of nature observations to economic analyses is a goal of the NPN, and citizen scientists have more than been up to the job. "Depending on the task at hand, trained non-scientists can produce data that is just as reliable as data produced by (professional) scientists," said Weltzin.

Steps in the journey

In addition to producing high quality data, armies of NPN volunteers also produce a high quantity of data. The NPN typically receives between 2,000 and 3,000 nature observations per day-most of which would otherwise be unobtainable.

Weltzin said that each and every one of these observations is important because they help fill a hole in our knowledge base. Moreover, a single observation can be analyzed in tandem with other observations to help create the big picture of how a particular species is responding to climate changes.

Suppose, for example, that several volunteers in a certain geographic area each alert the NPN as to the first bloom date of a dogwood tree in the spring. Those individual observations could then be analyzed as a group to determine the pattern of dogwood blooms in the area.

"So much of our improved understanding about global environmental changes is driven by varied and valuable sources of information that include ambitious networks of citizen-scientists," said John Wingfield, NSF assistant director for Biological Sciences. "Knowledge gained from their dedicated work will continue to have a lasting effect on how we understand regularly recurring biological phenomena for hundreds of plant and animal species and collectively, they contribute to the policy arena."

Changing seasons

Changes in phenology are among the most sensitive biological indicators of global change. Across the world, many springtime events are occurring earlier--and fall events happening later--than in the past. Plants and animals are responding to these changes in different ways and at different speeds. These varying responses can be damaging to the life-sustaining relationships among creatures that have been dynamically stable for thousands of years.

For example, some wildflowers that migratory hummingbirds look for when they arrive in their summer habitats are flowering earlier--even before the hummingbirds arrive. The resulting missed opportunity with the flowers can deprive the birds of an important food source. If the trend continues, populations of hummingbirds and wildflowers could precipitously decline. In addition, some birds now remain year-round in their summer habitats instead of flying south for the winter.

Because of these types of changes, scientists need more and improved information about the pace and pattern of nature--locally to nationally--to answer important scientific and societal questions and to build the tools and models needed to help people understand and adapt to the changes at hand.

Individuals of all ages, from school children to retirees, as well as entire classes and community groups, are invited to join the NPN "army" of citizen scientists; no minimal level of commitment is required. Some volunteers submit their observations on a regular basis while others contribute occasionally, or even contribute valuable archived "shoeboxed" records that, when possible, are added to the NPN database to support analyses of long-term trends.

What could be in it for you?

Weltzin said that volunteers contribute to the NPN for varied reasons, including the opportunity to:

  • Support the environmental field and the advancement of science.
  • Receive feedback from scientists about how the data they collected is being used and helping to advance science.
  • Put to good use "shoe box" data that they have previously collected about seasonal phenomena.
  • Interact via various social media forums sponsored by NPN with non-scientists who share similar interests.
  • Connect with fellow scientists who have overlapping research interests and resources to share with colleagues in their field.
  • Use the NPN Web site to announce events, news items and festivals that would interest NPN volunteers.
-- Lily Whiteman

Investigators
Susan Mazer
Jake Weltzin
Mark Schwartz                 

 
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
Are you a Nature Buff?? Like to observe plants and animals      (Join IN)
 
 
Steps To Get Started

1.   Learn about the plants and animals you can observe

Find out which species in your area are on the list - learn more about them and the phenophases to look for.

           

2.   Learn How To Observe

Learn how to select a site, select your plants and animals, and record your observations.

 
3.   Sign up to be an observer

Become an official participant and set your username and password. All you need is an email address and Internet access.

4.     Log in to Nature's Notebook

Now you are ready to register your site and the plants and animals you will observe, and start reporting! As you collect data during the season, log in to your account at "Nature's Notebook" and enter your observations.

Once you've submitted your observations, you can explore your data on the dynamic visualization tool and check out your standing on the leaderboards.

http://www.usanpn.org/participate/observe

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 08 2012 at 7:22pm

U.S. temperatures for April third warmest on record

Past 12 months and first third of the year were warmest nation has experienced

Several warm periods across the contiguous U.S. during April brought the national average temperature to 55F, 3.6F above average, marking the third warmest April on record. These temperatures, when added with the first quarter and previous 11 months, calculate to the warmest year-to-date and 12-month periods since recordkeeping began in 1895.

The 12-month period of May 2011-April 2012 has a nationally-averaged temperature 2.8F above the 1901-2000 long-term average, while the January-April 2012 months were 45.4F, 5.4F above the long-term average.

On the heels of the warmest March for the U.S., warmer and drier than average temperatures continued for much of the nation with some states in the Ohio Valley having a small, but still above average, dip in temperatures.

Note: The April 2012 Monthly Climate Report for the United States has several pages of supplemental information and data regarding the unprecedented early 2012 temperatures.

U.S. climate highlights - April

Warmer-than-average temperatures were present for a large portion of the nation during April with nine states in the Central and Northeast regions having April temperatures ranking among their ten warmest. Above-average temperatures were also present for the Southeast, Upper Midwest and much of the West.

Eight states - Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia - had average April temperatures cooler than their March temperatures. However, these temperatures were still above the long-term average for the month.

 

Statewide precipitation totals were mixed during April, with wetter than average conditions across the West Coast and Northern and Central Plains. Drier than average conditions were present in Texas and along the Gulf Coast, stretching northward toward the Great Lakes. The national precipitation average was 2.23 inches, 0.20 inch below average.

According to the Rutgers Global Snow Lab, the April snow cover extent across the contiguous United States was the third smallest on record, despite the late season Nor'easter which impacted the Northeast with snow near the end of April.

 
According to NOAA's Storm Prediction Center, there were 228 preliminary tornado reports during April, above the 1991-2010 average for the month. The majority of the tornadoes occurred during an April 14th outbreak across the Central Plains. Tornado activity during April 2012 was in stark contrast to April 2011, when over 750 tornadoes tore across the Southeast, causing significant damage and loss of life.
 

U.S. climate highlights - Year-to-date

January-April was the warmest such period on record for the contiguous United States, with an average temperature of 45.4F, 5.4F above the long-term average. Twenty-six states, all east of the Rockies, were record warm for the four-month period and an additional 17 states had temperatures for the period among their ten warmest.

 

The first four months of 2012 were drier than average for the contiguous United States as a whole, with some regional variability. The eastern third of the nation was drier than average, with Maryland and Delaware record dry, and an additional six states had precipitation totals ranking among the ten driest. Drier than average conditions were also present for much of the Interior West.

Wetter than average conditions occurred across the central regions of the country and the Pacific Northwest, where above average precipitation contributed to higher than normal mountain snowpack at the end of the snow season. The amount of snowpack in the springtime is important in determining water supply for the region for the upcoming summer period.

According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, as of May 1st, 38.2 percent of the contiguous United States was experiencing drought conditions, an increase from the 31.9 percent at the beginning of 2012. Drought worsened across the Northeast, Southeast, and the Interior West while beneficial precipitation significantly improved drought conditions across the Southern Plains and western Gulf of Mexico.

The U.S. Climate Extremes Index (USCEI), an index that tracks the highest and lowest 10 percent of extremes in temperature, precipitation, drought and tropical cyclones across the contiguous U.S., was a record 42 percent during the January-April period, over twice the average value. Extremes in warm daytime temperatures (82 percent) and warm nighttime temperatures (68 percent) covered a large area of the nation, contributing to the record high value.

12-month period (May 2011 - April 2012)
 
The 12 month period beginning May 2011 through April 2012, which includes several warm episodes for the country — second hottest summer, fourth warmest winter, and warmest March — was the warmest consecutive May-April year-long period for the contiguous United States. Twenty-two states were record warm for the 12-month period and an additional 19 states were top ten warm. The 12-month running average temperature for the contiguous U.S. was 55.7F, 2.8F above the 20th century average.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/summary-info/national/2012/4

 

 

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 26 2012 at 9:09am
April Global Temperatures Are Fifth Warmest 
 
 
 

State of the Climate
Global Analysis
April 2012

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

National Climatic Data Center

Note:

The data presented in this report are preliminary. Ranks and anomalies may change as more complete data are received and processed. Effective November 2011, the GHCN-M version 3.1.0 dataset of monthly mean temperature replaced the GHCN-M version 3 monthly mean temperature dataset. Beginning with the October 2011 Global monthly State of the Climate Report, GHCN-M version 3.1.0 is used for NCDC climate monitoring activities, including calculation of global land surface temperature anomalies and trends.

For more information about this newest version, please see the Modifications to Pairwise Homogeneity Adjustment software to address coding errors and improve run-time efficiency.

 


April 2012 Selected Climate
Anomalies and Events Map

Global Highlights

  • The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for April 2012 was 14.35C (57.87F), which is 0.65�C (1.17F) above the 20th century average of 13.7C (56.7F). The margin of error associated with this temperature is +/-0.08C (0.14F). The global temperature departure from the 20th century average and the monthly rank were the highest since November 2010, near the onset of first back-to-back La Ni�as in 2010.
  • The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for April 2012 was 14.35C (57.87F), which is 0.65C (1.17F) above the 20th century average of 13.7C (56.7F). The margin of error associated with this temperature is +/-0.08C (0.14F). The global temperature departure from the 20th century average and the monthly rank were the highest since November 2010, near the onset of first back-to-back La Ni�as in 2010.
  • The global land surface temperature was 1.39C (2.50F) above the 20th century average of 8.1C (46.5F), making this the second warmest April, behind 2007. The margin of error is +/-0.11C (0.20F). Warmer-than-average conditions engulfed much of the world's land areas, with the most notable warmth across Alaska, the contiguous United States, Mexico, and most of Russia. Cooler-than-average conditions were present across northern Australia and parts of western Europe.
  • The global land surface temperature was 1.39C (2.50F) above the 20th century average of 8.1C (46.5F), making this the second warmest April, behind 2007. The margin of error is +/-0.11C (0.20F).
  • For the ocean, the April global sea surface temperature was 0.38C (0.68F) above the 20th century average of 16.0C (60.9F)�the 11th warmest April on record. The margin of error is +/-0.04C (0.07F).
  • For the ocean, the April global sea surface temperature was 0.38C (0.68F) above the 20th century average of 16.0C (60.9F)�the 11th warmest April on record. The margin of error is +/-0.04C (0.07F).
  • The average Arctic sea ice extent during April 2012 was 1.8 percent below the 1979�2000 average, ranking as the 17th largest April extent since satellite records began in 1979 and the highest average April sea ice extent since 2001.
  • On the opposite pole, Antarctic sea ice during April was 9.2 percent above average and ranked as the sixth largest April extent in the 34-year period of record.
  • The Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent during April 2012 was much-below average, and ranked as the fourth smallest April snow cover extent in the 46-year period of record. Both the Eurasian and North American April snow cover extents were below average, ranking seventh and eighth smallest on record, respectively.
  • Precipitation was variable across the globe during April. Above-average precipitation fell over areas that include most of Europe, southern Brazil, the central United States, and parts of eastern Asia. Below-average precipitation was observed across eastern Brazil, the eastern United States, and southern parts of South America and Australia.

Introduction

The data presented in this report are preliminary. Ranks and anomalies may change as more complete data are received and processed.

Temperature anomalies for April 2012 and January�April 2012 are shown on the dot maps in the following section. The dot maps on the left provide a spatial representation of anomalies calculated from the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) version 3.1.0 dataset of land surface stations using a 1961�1990 base period. The dot maps on the right are a product of a merged land surface and sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly analysis developed by Smith et al. (2008). For the merged land surface and SST analysis, temperature anomalies with respect to the 1971�2000 average for land and ocean are analyzed separately and then merged to form the global analysis. For more information, please visit NCDC's Global Surface Temperature Anomalies page.


Temperatures

In the atmosphere, 500-millibar height pressure anomalies correlate well with temperatures at the Earth's surface. The average position of the upper-level ridges of high pressure and troughs of low pressure�depicted by positive and negative 500-millibar height anomalies on the April 2012 mapis generally reflected by areas of positive and negative temperature anomalies at the surface, respectively.

April

April 2012 Blended Land and Sea Surface
Temperature Anomalies in degrees Celsius

Unlike March 2012, where extremely cool and warm temperatures engulfed much of the Northern Hemisphere land surfaces, most of the world's land areas experienced warmer-than-average temperatures during April 2012. The most notable warmth was observed across Russia, the United States, Alaska, and parts of the Middle East and western Europe. After experiencing very warm March temperatures, parts of western Europe experienced cooler-than-average temperatures, and in some locations the April 2012 temperatures were cooler than the March 2012 temperatures. Other areas that experienced cooler-than-average conditions during the month include southern South America, southeastern Africa, and northern Australia. Globally, the April 2012 land-only surface temperature was 1.39C (2.50F) above the 20th century average of 8.1C (46.5F)�the second warmest April in the 133-year record, behind 2007. This was also the warmest land-only monthly temperature departure from the 20th century average since November 2010 and the 137th consecutive month with global land temperatures above the 20th century average. The last time land-only worldwide temperatures were below average was November 2000 (0.02C/0.04F below average). Of note, the Northern Hemisphere land surface temperature was 1.74C (3.13F) above the 20th century average, marking the warmest April since records began in 1880.

Several national highlights are found below:

  • The contiguous United States had a mean temperature of 13.2C (55.7F) in April 2012, which was 2.0C (3.6F) above the 20th century average, resulting in the third warmest April since national records began in 1895. Please visit NCDC's National State of the Climate report for additional information.

  • The United Kingdom's (UK) mean temperature during April 2012 was 0.6C (1.1F) below the 1971�2000 average�the coolest April mean temperature since 1989. According to the UK's Met Office, April 2012 was cooler than March 2012, an unusual event that last happened in 1998. For the first time since April 1989, April daily temperatures never reached 20C (68F). Provisionally, England, Wales, and Scotland had their coolest April since 1989, while Northern Island experienced its coolest April since 2000.

  • Spain experienced below-average temperatures during April 2012. According to Spain's National Agency of Meteorology (Agencia Estatal de Meteorologa), the April 2012 national mean temperature was 12.1C (53.8F), which is 0.2C (0.4F) below the 1971-2000 average.

  • According to Norway's Institute of Meteorology (Meteorologisk Institutt), Norway experienced cooler-than-average temperatures during April 2012. Temperatures during the month were 0.2C (0.4F) below average. This was the coolest April since 1998.

  • Sweden also had its coolest April since 1998, according to the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI).

  • According to Germany's Weather Service (Deutscher Wetterdienst), Germany as a whole had a mean temperature of 8.1C (46.9F), which is 0.8C (1.4F) above the 1961-1990 average and the 47th warmest (or 86th coolest) April since national records began in 1881.

  • In Antarctica, the South Pole station reported below-average temperatures during April 2012, with an average temperature of -59.6C (-75.3F), which is 2.1C (3.8F) below average. On April 6th, a new daily minimum temperature record was set when temperatures fell to -73.4C (-100.1F), surpassing the previous record of -71.7C (-97.1F) set in 1982. The period of record covers 1957-2012. The April 6th minimum temperature also broke the record for the earliest recording of -73.3C (-100.0F) at the South Pole station. The previous record of -75.2C (-103.4F) was set on April 7, 1982.

The worldwide ocean temperature during April 2012 was 0.38C (0.68F) above the 20th century average of 16.0C (60.9F)�the coolest April since 2008 and tied with 2011 as the eleventh warmest April on record. April 2012 was the 427th consecutive month with ocean temperatures warmer than the 20th century average. The last time the ocean temperatures were below average was September 1976 (0.01C/0.02F below average). A snapshot of the global temperatures indicates that warmer-than-average temperatures were observed across the North Atlantic, north-central Pacific Ocean, and across the mid-latitude southern oceans. Cooler-than-average conditions were present across the northeastern and central Pacific Ocean, parts of the southern half of the South Atlantic Ocean, and across the higher latitudes of the southern oceans. The El Ni�o-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which is a climate pattern defined by a periodic fluctuation in sea surface temperature (El Ni�o) and the air pressure of the overlying atmosphere (Southern Oscillation) across the equatorial Pacific Ocean, transitioned from La Ni�a phase to neutral conditions during April 2012, as temperatures across the equatorial Pacific Ocean continued to warm. According to NOAA's Climate Prediction Center (CPC), ENSO-neutral conditions are expected to persist through the Northern Hemisphere summer 2012.

Averaging the global land and ocean as a whole, the combined land and ocean surface temperature during April 2012 was 0.65C (1.17F) above the 20th century average of 13.7C (56.7F), marking the fifth warmest April since records began in 1880 and the 326th consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century average. February 1985 was the last month with below-average temperatures, at 0.01C (0.02F) below average. This was also the warmest global land and ocean surface temperature anomaly since November 2010, near the onset of first back-to-back La Ni�as in 2010.

AprilAnomalyRank
(out of 133 years)
Records
CFYear(s)CF
Global
Land+1.39 +/- 0.11+2.50 +/- 0.202nd WarmestWarmest: 2007+1.44+2.59
132nd CoolestCoolest: 1905-0.79-1.42
Ocean+0.38 +/- 0.04+0.68 +/- 0.0711th WarmestWarmest: 1998, 2010+0.56+1.01
123rd CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.53-0.95
Ties: 2011
Land and Ocean+0.65 +/- 0.08+1.17 +/- 0.145th WarmestWarmest: 2010+0.75+1.35
129th CoolestCoolest: 1909-0.52-0.94
Northern Hemisphere
Land+1.74 +/- 0.14+3.13 +/- 0.251st WarmestWarmest: 2000*+1.62*+2.92*
133rd CoolestCoolest: 1905-1.05-1.89
Ocean+0.37 +/- 0.04+0.67 +/- 0.079th WarmestWarmest: 2010+0.59+1.06
125th CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.52-0.94
Ties: 2001
Land and Ocean+0.89 +/- 0.11+1.60 +/- 0.201st WarmestWarmest: 2007+, 2010++0.87++1.57+
133rd CoolestCoolest: 1909-0.59-1.06
Southern Hemisphere
Land+0.47 +/- 0.14+0.85 +/- 0.2523rd WarmestWarmest: 2005, 2007+1.07+1.93
111st CoolestCoolest: 1917-0.76-1.37
Ties: 2011
Ocean+0.41 +/- 0.05+0.74 +/- 0.0914th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.61+1.10
120th CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.52-0.94
Land and Ocean+0.42 +/- 0.06+0.76 +/- 0.1116th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.66+1.19
118th CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.52-0.94
Ties: 1990, 1991

* Please note that the value depicted as record year (2000) for the Northern Hemisphere land is the second warmest year on record.

+ Please note that the value depicted as record year (2007 and 2010) for the Northern Hemisphere land and ocean tie for the second warmest year on record.


 
Year-to-date (January-April)

 

The January�April map of temperature anomalies shows that warmer-than-average temperatures occurred across the contiguous United States, southern Canada, Mexico, southern South America, the United Kingdom, Scandinavia, northern Russia, and parts of southeastern Asia. Cooler-than-average conditions were observed across Alaska, northern Africa, central Asia, eastern Russia, and most of Australia.

The globally-averaged land and ocean temperature for January�April 2012 was 0.46�C (0.83�F) above the 20th century average of 12.6C (54.8F), the coolest such period since 2008 and the 15th warmest such period in the 133-year record. The land-only global average temperature anomaly of 0.75C (1.35F) above the 20th century average of 4.8C (40.5F) ties with 2011 as the 17th warmest such period and was the coolest such period since 1997. Meanwhile, the global ocean temperature tied with 1999 as the 13th warmest such period, with an anomaly of 0.35C (0.63F) above the 20th century average of 15.9C (60.7F)�the coolest January�April anomaly since 2008.

  • The contiguous United States mean temperature during January�April was 7.4�C (45.4�F), which is 3.0�C (5.4�F) above the long-term average and the warmest such period since national records began in 1895. Please visit NCDC's National State of the Climate report for additional information.

  • According to Norway's Institute of Meteorology (Meteorologisk Institutt), the January�April 2012 temperature for the country as a whole was 1.7C (3.1F) above the 1961-1990 average, resulting in the 20th warmest such period since national records began in 1900.

January�AprilAnomalyRank
(out of 133 years)
Records
CFYear(s)CF
Global
Land+0.75 +/- 0.22+1.35 +/- 0.4017th WarmestWarmest: 2007+1.38+2.48
117th CoolestCoolest: 1893-1.04-1.87
Ties: 2011
Ocean+0.35 +/- 0.04+0.63 +/- 0.0713th WarmestWarmest: 1998, 2010+0.56+1.01
121st CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.51-0.92
Ties: 1999
Land and Ocean+0.46 +/- 0.09+0.83 +/- 0.1615th WarmestWarmest: 2010+0.71+1.28
119th CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.53-0.95
Northern Hemisphere
Land+0.87 +/- 0.26+1.57 +/- 0.4718th WarmestWarmest: 2007+1.58+2.84
116th CoolestCoolest: 1893-1.25-2.25
Ocean+0.32 +/- 0.05+0.58 +/- 0.0913th WarmestWarmest: 2010+0.55+0.99
121st CoolestCoolest: 1904, 1908, 1911-0.46-0.83
Land and Ocean+0.53 +/- 0.14+0.95 +/- 0.2516th WarmestWarmest: 2007+0.89+1.60
118th CoolestCoolest: 1893-0.71-1.28
Ties: 2008
Southern Hemisphere
Land+0.43 +/- 0.14+0.77 +/- 0.2522nd WarmestWarmest: 2010+1.02+1.84
112nd CoolestCoolest: 1917-0.80-1.44
Ties: 1969
Ocean+0.38 +/- 0.04+0.68 +/- 0.0715th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.60+1.08
119th CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.53-0.95
Ties: 2000
Land and Ocean+0.39 +/- 0.07+0.70 +/- 0.1317th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.65+1.17
117th CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.54-0.97
Ties: 1973
 
 
 

 


Precipitation

The maps below represent anomaly values based on the GHCN version 2 dataset of land surface stations using a base period of 1961�1990. During April 2012, above-average precipitation fell over areas that included the central and northwestern United States, and parts of northern and southern South America, Europe, and eastern Asia. Drier-than-average conditions were present across the eastern United States, the Hawaiian Islands, eastern Brazil, and southern parts of South America, and Australia.

  • The decline of the La Ni�a brought to an end the wet conditions that eastern Australia had been experiencing for several months. According to Australia's Bureau of Meteorology, Australia experienced drier-than-average conditions across most of the nation, with 41 percent below-average rainfall. This was the 34th driest April in the nations 113-year record. Western Australia experienced 57 percent below-average precipitation in April, which was the lowest since April 2001.

  • The United Kingdom received a total of 126.5 mm (5.0 inches) of precipitation during April 2012, which is the UK's wettest April since national records began in 1910. Provisionally, England had its wettest April on record, and also tied with 1998 with the highest number of rainy days in April in the last five decades.

  • France experienced above-average precipitation, with 70 percent above average. This was France's wettest April since 1959 and fifth wettest since national records began.
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 07 2012 at 1:01pm

Is Humanity Pushing Earth Past a Tipping Point?

By Brandon Keim June 6, 2012 | 5:23 pm | 

Could human activity push Earth's biological systems to a planet-wide tipping point, causing changes as radical as the Ice Age's end - but with less pleasant results, and with billions of people along for a bumpy ride?

It's by no means a settled scientific proposition, but many researchers say it's worth considering - and not just as an apocalyptic warning or far-fetched speculation, but as a legitimate question raised by emerging science.

"There are some biological realities we can�t ignore," said paleoecologist Anthony Barnosky of the University of California, Berkeley. "What I'd like to avoid is getting caught by surprise."

In "Approaching a state shift in Earth�s biosphere," published June 6 in Nature, Barnosky and 21 co-authors cite 100 papers in summarizing what�s known about environmental tipping points.

While the concept was popularized by Malcolm Gladwell's accounts of sudden, widespread changes in society, the underlying mathematics - which won physicist Kenneth Wilson a Nobel Prize in 1982 - have far-reaching implications.

In the last few decades, scientists have found tipping behaviors in various natural environments, from locale-scale ponds and coral reefs to regional systems like the Sahara desert, which until 5,500 years ago was a fertile grassland, and perhaps even the Amazon basin.

Deforestation in the Amazon jungle, which some scientists say could become a savannah. Image: NASA

Common to these examples is a type of transformation not described in traditional ideas of nature as existing in a static balance, with change occurring gradually. Instead, the systems seem to be dynamic, ebbing and flowing within a range of biological parameters.

Stress those parameters - with fast-rising temperatures, say, or a burst of nutrients - and systems are capable of sudden, feedback loop-fueled reconfiguration.

According to some researchers, that�s what happened when life�s diversity exploded in an eyeblink 540 million years ago, or much more recently when a glacier-chilled Earth became in a couple thousand years the temperate garden that cradled human civilization.

But while the Cambrian explosion and Holocene warming were sparked by natural, planet-wide changes to ocean chemistry and solar intensity, say Barnosky and colleagues, there's a new force to consider: 7 billion people who exert a combined influence usually associated with planetary processes.

Human activity now dominates 43 percent of Earth�s land surface and affects twice that area. One-third of all available fresh water is diverted to human use. A full 20 percent of Earth�s net terrestrial primary production, the sheer volume of life produced on land every year, is harvested for human purposes. Extinction rates compare to those recorded during the demise of dinosaurs and average temperatures will likely be higher in 2070 than at any point in human evolution.

Scientists informally call our current geological age the "Anthropocene,"  and to Barnosky's group this means we're strong enough to tip the planet, radically changing regional climates and ecologies.

"Everything that happened the last time around is happening now, only more of it," said Barnosky of the last ice age's end and ongoing changes to Earth's climate and biosphere. "I think the evidence makes it pretty clear that another critical transition or tipping point is very plausible within the next century."

Yet while Barnosky and colleagues write that the plausibility of a planetary shift is high, they say "considerable uncertainty remains about whether it is inevitable and, if so, how far in the future it may be." Other scientists echoed the caution.

"We have quite good evidence for the Earth having tipping elements. They can be very small, like a pond, or large like a monsoon system. Those we understand very well. But the bigger ones are harder to understand," said ecologist Marten Scheffer of Wageningen University, a tipping point research pioneer. Scheffer said he is "not so convinced" that a single, Earth-wide shift is imminent.

'There have been big, planetary shifts before. We can see it coming. That's the difference.'
In contrast, ecologist Aaron Ellison of Harvard University, who studies the dynamics of tipping points, said the new paper "states the obvious. We're in a rapidly changing world and things are happening really quickly."

One important aspect of the new review, said ecologist Steve Carpenter of the University of Wisconsin, is its focus on changing land use patterns.

Most historical large-scale tips were apparently driven by changes in Earth's biogeochemistry, such as the bacterial oxygenation of primeval seas that afterwards could support multicellular life. But humans are rapidly changing local species compositions and ecosystem functions, causing small-scale changes that could combine and cascade into planet-wide shifts.

Brad Cardinale, an ecologist at the University of Wisconsin, said the science is suggestive but still not conclusive, likening the trajectory of research to that followed by chaos theory in the late 20th century.

"We discovered in mathematical models that chaos should exist and, if it did, it would have major implications for our ability to predict ecological changes on the planet. A few empirical case studies emerged to suggest chaos actually occurs in ecosystems. But the interpretation of some of these was controversial, and subsequent studies ultimately failed to show that chaos was the generality," he said.

Continued Cardinale, "Ten years from now, the Barnosky et al. paper will have one of two fates. We'll either look back and think this was a visionary warning about how people are changing the planet. Or we'll look back and say that state shifts was a 'sexy' idea that was over-sold and didn�t pan out. Only time will tell."

The pressing question, then, is one of risk analysis: Given incomplete but troubling information, what should people do? Barnosky and colleagues call for innovations and changes - more-efficient food production, fossil fuel alternatives, better ecosystem management and reduced population growth. Ellison hopes some disruptive change will cause a tipping point in human sustainability.

"These are admittedly huge tasks, but are vital if the goal of science and society is to steer the biosphere towards conditions we desire, rather than those that are thrust upon us unwittingly," wrote Barnosky and colleagues.

"There have been big, planetary shifts before," Barnosky said. "We can see it coming. That's the difference. The dinosaurs couldn't see it coming."

 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 15 2012 at 12:48pm

U.S. experiences second warmest May, hottest spring on record

Lower 48 also experienced record warm year-to-date and twelve-month periods

The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during May was 64.3F, 3.3F above the long-term average, making it the second warmest May on record. The month's high temperatures also contributed to the warmest spring, warmest year-to-date, and warmest 12-month period the nation has experienced since recordkeeping began in 1895.

The spring season's (March-May) nationally-averaged temperature was 57.1F, 5.2�F above the 1901-2000 long-term average, surpassing the previous warmest spring (1910) by 2.0F.

Precipitation totals across the country were mixed during May, with the nation as a whole being drier than average. The nationally-averaged precipitation total of 2.51 inches was 0.36 inch below average. The coastal Southeast received some drought relief when Tropical Storm Beryl brought heavy rains to the region late in the month.

Note: The May/Spring Monthly Climate Report for the United States has several pages of supplemental information and data regarding some of the exceptional events from the month and season.

U.S. climate highlights - May

  • Warmer-than-average temperatures occurred across all parts of the contiguous U.S., except the Northwest, during May. Twenty-six states had May temperatures ranking among their ten warmest.


       May 2012 Statewide Temperature (top) and Precipitation (bottom) ranks

  • Precipitation patterns across the contiguous U.S. were mixed during May. The Eastern Seaboard and Upper Midwest were wetter than average. North Carolina, South Carolina, Vermont, New Hampshire and Minnesota had May precipitation totals among their ten wettest. Dry conditions prevailed across the Mid-Mississippi River Valley, Southern Plains and the Interior West with Arkansas, Missouri, Kansas, Nevada and Utah having a top ten dry May.

  • Tropical Storm Beryl made landfall near Jacksonville, Fla., on May 28, bringing beneficial rainfall to parts of the drought-stricken Southeast. Beryl occurred on the heels of Tropical Storm Alberto, which occurred offshore the Carolinas, marking the third time on record that two tropical cyclones reached tropical storm strength during May (prior to the start of June 1 hurricane season) in the North Atlantic basin. (click for a table of all known pre-season tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic)
  • Ongoing drought, combined with windy conditions, created ideal wildfire conditions across the Southwest. The Whitewater-Baldy Fire complex in the Gila National Forest of western New Mexico charred over 210,000 acres by the beginning of June. It surpassed 2011's Las Conchas Fire as largest wildfire on record for the state.
  • According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, as of May 29th, 37.4 percent of the contiguous U.S. experienced drought conditions, a slight decrease from 38.2 percent at the beginning of May. Drought conditions improved across the coastal Southeast, the Southern Plains, Northeast and Upper Midwest while they deteriorated for parts of the Mid-South and Southwest.

U.S. climate highlights - Spring (March-May)

 


   May 2012 Statewide Temperature (top) and Precipitation (bottom) ranks

  • Spring was drier than average for the contiguous U.S. as a whole, with a national precipitation total of 7.47 inches, 0.24 inch below average.
  • Record and near-record warmth dominated the eastern two-thirds of the nation during spring. Thirty-one states were record warm for the season and 11 additional states had spring temperatures ranking among their ten warmest. Only Oregon and Washington had spring temperatures near normal.
  • Wetter-than-average conditions prevailed from the West Coast through the Northern Plains and into the Upper Midwest. Oregon was record wet and Minnesota and Washington were third wettest. The Intermountain West, Ohio Valley, and parts of the Mid-Atlantic were drier than average. Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Indiana, and Delaware had a top ten dry spring.

  • The U.S. Climate Extremes Index, an index that tracks the highest and lowest 10 percent of extremes in temperature, precipitation, drought and tropical cyclones across the contiguous U.S., was a record-large 44 percent during the March-May period, over twice the average value. Extremes in warm daytime temperatures (81 percent) and warm nighttime temperatures (72 percent) covered large areas of the nation, contributing to the record high value.

U.S. climate highlights  Year-to-date

  • The January-May months were the warmest such period on record for the contiguous United States, with an average temperature of 49.2F, 5.0F above the long-term average. Twenty-nine states, all east of the Rockies, were record warm for the five-month period and an additional 14 states had temperatures for the period among their ten warmest.

 

 


  Year-to-date average temperature (through May) for the 83 years on record at St. Louis, Missouri. 2012 in crimson. Please click for similar supplemental information for about 150 U.S. cities.

  • The year's first five months also brought dry conditions to much of the East. The Southwest was drier than average while wetter-than-average conditions persisted for the Pacific Northwest, Upper Midwest and the western Gulf Coast. The national precipitation total for the five-month period was nearly 1.0 inch below average.

12-month period (June 2011 - May 2012)


      The ten warmest 12-month periods of the U.S. record. Click to enlarge, or click here for expanded information.
  • The June 2011-May 2012 period was the warmest 12-month period of any 12 months on record for the contiguous United States. The nationally-averaged temperature of 56.0F was 3.2F above the long-term average, surpassing the previous warmest 12-month period, set last month, by 0.4F. The 12-month period encapsulated the second warmest summer, fourth warmest winter, and the warmest spring on record. Every state across the contiguous U.S. had warmer than average temperatures for the period, except Washington, which was near normal.
  • Each of the 12 months from June 2011 through May 2012 ranked among the warmest third of their historical distribution for the first time in the 1895-present record. The odds of this occurring randomly are 1 in 531,441.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/summary-info/national/2012/4

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 19 2012 at 10:37am

May 2012 global temperatures were second-warmest on record

Month sets new mark for globally-averaged warmth over land surfaces

The globally-averaged temperature for May 2012 marked the second warmest May since record keeping began in 1880. May 2012 also marks the 36th consecutive May and 327th consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century average.

 

Most areas of the world experienced much warmer-than-average monthly temperatures, including nearly all of Europe, Asia, northern Africa, most of North America and southern Greenland. Only Australia, Alaska and parts of the western U.S.-Canadian border region were notably cooler than average.

With the dissipation of La Nina in April, ocean conditions in May were "ENSO neutral". According to NOAA's Climate Prediction Center, there is a 50 percent chance that El Nino conditions will emerge during the second half of 2012.

Global temperature highlights: May

  • The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for May was second warmest on record for May, behind 2010, at 59.79F (15.46C) or 1.19F (0.66C) above the 20th century average. This was the warmest monthly departure from normal since November 2010. The margin of error associated with this temperature is +/- 0.13F (0.07C).
  • May marked the 36th consecutive May and 327th consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century average. The last below-average temperature May was May 1976 and the last below-average temperature month was February 1985.
  • The global land surface temperature for May was 2.18F (1.21C) above the 20th century average of 52.0F (11.1C), the all-time warmest May on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.25F (0.14C).

May 2012 Blended Land & Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies in °C

  • Warmer-than-average monthly temperatures occurred across much of the Northern Hemisphere while cooler-than-average temperatures occurred in parts of the Southern Hemisphere.
  • Spain observed its fourth warmest May since national records began in 1960 at 4.9F (2.7C) above average.
  • The nationally-averaged daytime temperature in Australia was near average (+0.5C), while the average nighttime temperature was well below average (-2.9C), ranking as the fifth coolest May nighttime temperature in that country's 63-year period of record.
  • For the ocean, the May global sea surface temperature was 0.81F (0.45C) above the 20th century average of 61.3F (16.3C), or 10th warmest May on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.07F (0.04C).
  • Neutral ocean conditions continued during May as sea surface temperatures continued to warm across the equatorial Pacific Ocean. According to NOAA's Climate Prediction Center, there is a 50 percent chance that El Niño conditions will emerge during the second half of 2012. In addition to influencing seasonal climate outcomes in the United States, El Niño is often, but not always, associated with global temperatures that are higher than temperatures in the neutral and La Niña phases.

Global temperature highlights: March-May

  • The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for the March-May months was 1.06F (0.59C) above the 20th century average of 56.7F (13.7C), making it seventh warmest March-May period on record. The margin of error associated with this temperature is +/- 0.14F (0.08C).

Year to Date 2012 Blended Land & Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies in °C

  • The global land surface temperature was 2.02F (1.12C) above the 20th century average of 46.4F (8.1C), making it fourth warmest March-May on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.25F (0.14C). Record April and May warmth in the Northern Hemisphere led to the warmest spring on record with a large temperature departure of 2.48F (1.38C) above the long-term average. That warmth was most pronounced across central Eurasia and most of North America. It was cooler than average across Alaska in the Northern Hemisphere and Australia in the Southern Hemisphere.
  • The United States reported its warmest spring on record with 31 states in the eastern two-thirds of the country experiencing record warmth. The national temperature was 5.2F (2.9C) above its long-term average, surpassing the previous record by 2.0F (1.1C).
  • In central Europe, Austria reported its seventh warmest spring since records began in 1767. In the east, the district of Lienz was just 0.4F (0.2C) short of the record warmth of May 2007.
  • The Southern Hemisphere autumn was cooler-than-average across most of Australia with daytime temperatures 0.67F (0.37C) below average and nighttime temperatures ranking as fourth lowest on record (-1.67F / 0.9C), or lowest since 1994. La Nina, which tends to have a cooling influence over the region, ended during the season.
  • For the ocean, the March-May global sea surface temperature was 0.70F (0.39C) above the 20th century average of 61.0F (16.1C), tying with 2011 as 11th warmest March-May on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.07F (0.04C).

Polar sea ice and precipitation highlights: May

  • The average Arctic sea ice extent during May was 3.5 percent below average, resulting in the 12th smallest May sea ice extent on record since satellite records began in 1979.
  • On the opposite pole, Antarctic sea ice during May 2012 was 2.4 percent above average and ranked as 15th largest May extent in the 34-year period of record.

Arctic and Antarctic sea ice extent, from the May 2012 Global Snow & Ice Report

  • The Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent during May 2012 was much below average and ranked as second smallest May snow cover extent in the 46-year period of record. Eurasian snow cover extent was its all-time smallest May extent on record and the North American snow cover extents ranked its eighth smallest May extent on record.
  • With the dissipation of La Nina in April, below-average precipitation fell across Australia in May with an average amount that was 60 percent of the monthly average. Western Australia reported its fifth driest May with precipitation just 22 percent of average.
  • Spain was dry in May with average precipitation at 60 percent of the monthly average. The country's Mediterranean regions and archipelagos were the driest regions with precipitation less than 25 percent of average. In the east, stations in Murcia and Castellon reported its driest Mays on record.
  • Much of India was drier than average for the month as the country anticipated the onset of its annual southwest monsoon season.

Global temperature highlights: Year to Date

  • On the heels of a relatively mild first quarter, warmth during April and May pushed 2012 close to a top 10 warm status for the year to date. The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for the January-May period was 0.90°F (0.50°C) above the 20th century average of 55.5F (13.1C), marking the 11th warmest such period on record. The margin of error is +/-0.16F (0.09C).

 

  • The January-May worldwide land surface temperature was 1.53F (0.85C) above the 20th century average, marking the 10th warmest such period on record. The margin of error is +/- 0.38F (0.21C).
  • The global ocean surface temperature for the year to date was 0.67F (0.37C) above average and ranked as the 12th warmest such period on record and the coolest since 2008. The margin of error is +/- 0.07F (0.04C).

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/summary-info/global/2012/3

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2012 at 12:24pm
More than half of the Country in Drought Conditions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 07 2012 at 1:19pm
This is why I purchased enough wheat berries to make bread for two years or more if I ration. This drought could go on for a long time. I may be getting more water cubes.
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 15 2012 at 1:59pm
State of the Climate
National Overview
June 2012

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

National Climatic Data Center

Climate Highlights  June  2012

  • The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during June was 71.2F, which is 2.0F above the 20th century average. The June temperatures contributed to a record-warm first half of the year and the warmest 12-month period the nation has experienced since recordkeeping began in 1895. Scorching temperatures during the second half of the month led many cities to set all-time temperature records
  • June%20Divisional%20Temperature%20Anomalies

  •  
  • Precipitation totals across the country were mixed during June. The nation, as a whole, experienced its tenth driest June on record, with a nationally-averaged precipitation total of 2.27 inches, 0.62 inch below average. Record and near-record dry conditions were present across the Intermountain West, while Tropical Storm Debby dropped record precipitation across Florida
  •  
  • Warmer-than-average temperatures were anchored across the Intermountain West and much of the Great Plains during June. Colorado had its warmest June on record, with a statewide temperature 6.4�F above average. Seven additional states in the region had a top ten warm June. 
  •  
  • Cooler-than-average temperatures were present for the Pacific Northwest, where Washington had its seventh coolest June on record. Cooler-than-average conditions were also present for the Southeast, despite record warm temperatures towards the end of the month.
  • Record-breaking temperatures occurred across a large portion of the nation during the second half of June. Over 170 all-time warm temperature records were broken or tied during the month. Temperatures in South Carolina (113F) and Georgia (112F) are currently under review by the U.S. State Climate Extremes Committee as possible all-time statewide temperature records.
  • Precipitation patterns were mixed across the country. Drier-than-average conditions were present from the West, through the Plains, into the Ohio Valley and Mid-Atlantic. Wyoming had its driest June on record, with a precipitation total of 0.45 inch, which is 1.27 inches below average. Eleven additional states from Nevada to Kentucky had June precipitation totals ranking among their ten driest.
  • According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, as of July 3, 56.0 percent of the contiguous U.S. experienced drought conditions, marking the largest percentage of the nation experiencing drought conditions in the 12-year record of the U.S. Drought Monitor. Drought conditions improved across Florida, due to the rains from Tropical Storm Debby. Drought conditions worsened across much of the West, Central Plains, and the Ohio Valley, causing significant impacts on agriculture in those regions.
  • Tropical Storm Debby brought copious precipitation to Florida during June as it slowly traversed the state. Florida�s monthly statewide precipitation total of 13.16 inches was 6.17 inches above average, ranking as the wettest June on record for the state. Parts of the Northeast, as well as the Pacific Northwest, were wetter than average. Maine, Oregon, and Washington each had a top ten wet June.
  • Several large wildfires raged across the West in June, destroying hundreds of homes and causing the evacuation of tens of thousands of residences. The very dry, warm, and windy weather created ideal wildfire conditions. Nationwide, wildfires scorched over 1.3 million acres, the second most on record during June.
  • A list of select June temperature and precipitation records can be found here.
  • Climate Highlights - Year-to-Date (January-June)
  • The January-June period was the warmest first half of any year on record for the contiguous United States. The national temperature of 52.9F was 4.5F above average. Most of the contiguous U.S. was record and near-record warm for the six-month period, except the Pacific Northwest. Twenty-eight states east of the Rockies were record warm and an additional 15 states were top ten warm.
  • The first six months of 2012 were also drier than average for much of the contiguous U.S., with a nationally-averaged precipitation total 1.62 inches below average. Drier-than-average conditions stretched from the West, through the Central Plains, into the Ohio Valley and Mid-Atlantic. Fourteen states in total had precipitation totals for the six-month period among their ten driest.
  • Wetter-than-average conditions were present for the Northwest and Upper Midwest, where Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington had six-month precipitation totals among their ten wettest.
  • The U.S. Climate Extremes Index (USCEI), an index that tracks the highest and lowest 10 percent of extremes in temperature, precipitation, drought and tropical cyclones across the contiguous U.S., was a record-large 44 percent during the January-June period, over twice the average value. Extremes in warm daytime temperatures (83 percent) and warm nighttime temperatures (70 percent) covered large areas of the nation, contributing to the record high value.
  • Climate Highlights - 12-month period (July 2011-June 2012)
  • The July 2011-June 2012 period was the warmest 12-month period of any 12-months on record for the contiguous U.S., narrowly surpassing the record broken last month for the June 2011-May 2012 period by 0.05F. The nationally-averaged temperature of 56.0F was 3.2F above the long term average. Every state across the contiguous U.S. had warmer than average temperatures for the period, except Washington, which was near normal.
  •  
    Warmest%2012%20months
     
    For detailed info on regions select link below

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2012/6

    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2012 at 8:30am

    Earth  

    (The Operators Manual)

     By: Republican Scientist
     
     
    Select Link To View
     
     
     
     
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Elver View Drop Down
    Valued Member
    Valued Member


    Joined: June 14 2008
    Status: Offline
    Points: 7778
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 20 2012 at 9:20pm
    The drought here in Colorado is very bad.  Normally in the summer we get at least 2 bags, or more, of grass every week from mowing.  This year we've only had to mow every other week & we don't even get half a bag.  The grass simply isn't growing. 
     
    Interesting though is that they've only declared a level 2 drought season rather than level 3 or 4.  We have different watering rules for each stage.  This year we are prohibited from watering from 10:00 AM until 6:00 PM.  They also don't want anyone watering more than twice a week.  Yet, I bet all over California, they are still filling up those swimming pools & draining the Colorado river.  Lake Mead is emptying fast, so Californian's will learn conservation too late.  I really bothers me that our yards have to suffer while people in Vegas & LA are swimming in their pools all the time.
     
    Water is going to be a major concern in the near future.  Also, the Ogallala aquifer which irrigates the midwest is down 2/3rds from where it was years ago. 
     
    Plant more trees!
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 21 2012 at 10:01am
    Elver
     
    Its easy to blame others for our own problems, and I do agree with you on the waste from the Colorado River Project as I live in Phoenix Az which entirely dependant on the Coloado Water system for Water and I see much waste here as people who come here want the same green environment their accustomed to from wherever they came from. There are whole sections of the city that are still based on a flooding irrigation system which is just absurd, just so they can have nice green grass in a desert that can not support it (Crazy).  
     
    Hers the thing
     
    The colorado Water Reclamation Project is based on a gravity and stratically placed dams, resevours, and duct systems. The water California uses has nothing to do with Colorado water availablity as you are Up the hill so-da-speak. If you drained all the pools and turned off the water to LA your situation would not change in the slightest bit as that water would drain off as it always has based on gravity. And on top of that thinking that the water stored in this system should some how be pumped back up the hill to Colorado is just not feasable cost wise, if they tried to do this your water costs would quadrouple overnight. Colorado has been fortinate as Mother Nature controls your water system with rain and mostly snow pack in the many mountains and natural systems the state is blessed with. If the climate (Drought) keeps progressing in your state Colorado may need to consider larger and a more extensive storage system similar to the downhill states California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and others.
     
    Putting thins in perspective though, your comment about someones swimming pool in Vegas or LA are minor on the scale of total consuption. For all the water used by California through the Colorado Water System out of 10 gallons used almost 8 of those are used by Agriculture which produces much of the fresh produce for the Western United States. And of that it is estimated that out of those 8 2 are considered wasted or over used in current irrigation practices. Arizona where I live is in the same boat and actualy by percentage by far passes California in increasing Usage over the past 2 decades.
     
    If current conditions in Climate continue for an extended period of time many of the Downhill states will feel the effects as well and it will be much more severe as they are much more dependant on the system than your state is. It will just take a little longer to directly affect these states as they have planned ahead for many decades and have huge storage basins to accomiditae for shortlived droughts which come and go. Lets just hope that Mother NAture and the changing climate conditions are not long lived, as we seem to be stubbornly resistant in planning and spending the neccessar public money to address these problems accross the Country not just in your state. These type of solutions take years and even decades to be planned, built, and come online.
     
    We have become to short sighted in this Country not only in planning for Water, but also Energy, and other critical subjects that need to be addressed long term not on a 2 year election cycle.
     
     
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 23 2012 at 9:42am
    State of the Climate
    Global Analysis

    June 2012
     

    Global Highlights

    • The average combined global land and ocean surface temperature for June 2012 was 0.63C (1.13F) above the 20th century average of 15.5C (59.9F). This is the fourth warmest June since records began in 1880.

    • The Northern Hemisphere land and ocean average surface temperature for June 2012 was the all-time warmest June on record, at 1.30C (2.34F) above average.

    • The globally-averaged land surface temperature for June 2012 was also the all-time warmest June on record, at 1.07C (1.93F) above average.

    • ENSO-neutral conditions continued in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean during June 2012 as sea surface temperature anomalies continued to rise. The June worldwide ocean surface temperatures ranked as the 10th warmest June on record.

    • The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for January�June 2012 was the 11th warmest on record, at 0.52C (0.94F) above the 20th century average.



    Please Note: The data presented in this report are preliminary. Ranks and anomalies may change as more complete data are received and processed. Effective with the July 2010 State of the Climate Report, NCDC transitioned to the new version (version 3b) of the extended reconstructed sea surface temperature (ERSST) dataset. ERSST.v3b is an improved extended SST reconstruction over version 2. For more information about the differences between ERSST.v3b and ERSST.v2 and to access the most current data, please visit NCDC's Global Surface Temperature Anomalies page.


    Introduction

    Temperature anomalies for June 2012 are shown on the dot maps below. The dot maps on the left provide a spatial representation of anomalies calculated from the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) dataset of land surface stations using a 1961�1990 base period. The dot maps on the right are a product of a merged land surface and sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly analysis developed by Smith et al. (2008). For the merged land surface and SST analysis, temperature anomalies with respect to the 1971-2000 average for land and ocean are analyzed separately and then merged to form the global analysis. For more information, please visit NCDC's Global Surface Temperature Anomalies page.


    Temperatures

    In the atmosphere, 500-millibar height pressure anomalies correlate well with temperatures at the Earth's surface. The average position of the upper-level ridges of high pressure and troughs of low pressure�depicted by positive and negative 500-millibar height anomalies on the June 2012 map�is generally reflected by areas of positive and negative temperature anomalies at the surface, respectively.

    June

    The average global temperature across land and oceans during June 2012 was 0.63C (1.13F) above the 20th century average of 15.5C (59.9F) and ranked as the fourth warmest June since records began in 1880. June 2012 also marks the 36th consecutive June and 328th consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century average. The last below-average June temperature was June 1976 and the last below-average temperature for any month was February 1985. It was the second warmest June in the Northern Hemisphere, behind only the record warmth of 2010. The Southern Hemisphere had its 12th warmest June on record.

    The global land surface temperature for June was 1.07C (1.93F) above the 20th century average of 13.3C (55.9F), the warmest June on record. This is the second month in a row that the global land temperature was the warmest on record for that month.

    The Northern Hemisphere average land temperature, where the majority of Earth's land is located, was record warmest for June. This makes three months in a row ' April, May, and June ' in which record-high monthly land temperature records were set. Most areas experienced much higher-than-average monthly temperatures, including most of North America and Eurasia, and northern Africa. Only northern and western Europe, and the northwestern United States were notably cooler than average.

    • Austria recorded its highest ever June temperature of 37.7C (99.9F) on June 30th in two locations � the capital city of Vienna and in German-Altenburg, Nope. This bests the previous record of 37.2C (98.9F) set on June 22nd, 2000 in both Lutmannburg, Burganland and Langenlebarn, Nope. The monthly temperature averaged across Austria was the sixth warmest June since national records began 250 years ago.

    • Norway experienced its 25th coolest June since records began in 1900, at 1.2C (2.2F) below average. Parts of eastern Norway observed temperatures that were 2-3C (3.6-4.5F) below their local monthly averages.

    • The monthly temperature during June in the United Kingdom was 0.3C (0.5F) below the 1971�2000 average, making this the coolest June since 1991.

    The Southern Hemisphere land temperature was the 20th warmest on record.

    • Australia remained cooler than average during June. The average daytime (maximum) temperature was 0.27C (0.49F) below the 1961-1990 average, while the nighttime (minimum) temperature had a greater departure, 0.94C (1.69F) below average.

    Across the world's oceans, the June average global sea surface temperature was 0.47�C (0.85F) above the 20th century average of 16.4C (61.5F), the 10th warmest June on record. Ocean temperatures were notably below average in the northeastern Pacific Ocean and much higher than average in the northeast Atlantic and in the Labrador Sea near Greenland. The region of the equatorial Pacific Ocean where ENSO conditions are measured also trended higher than average in June. NOAA's Climate Prediction Center issued an El Nino watch, and stated that there is an increased chance for El Ni�o beginning in July�September 2012.

    JuneAnomalyRank
    (out of 133 years)
    Records
    CFYear(s)CF
    Global
    Land+1.07 +/- 0.13+1.93 +/- 0.231st WarmestWarmest: 2012+1.07+1.93
    133rd CoolestCoolest: 1907-0.60-1.08
    Ocean+0.47 +/- 0.04+0.85 +/- 0.0710th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.59+1.06
    124th CoolestCoolest: 1909, 1911-0.50-0.90
    Ties: 2011
    Land and Ocean+0.63 +/- 0.07+1.13 +/- 0.134th WarmestWarmest: 2010+0.67+1.21
    130th CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.44-0.79
    Northern Hemisphere
    Land+1.30 +/- 0.14+2.34 +/- 0.251st WarmestWarmest: 2012+1.30+2.34
    133rd CoolestCoolest: 1907-0.66-1.19
    Ocean+0.46 +/- 0.04+0.83 +/- 0.0711th WarmestWarmest: 2009+0.62+1.12
    123rd CoolestCoolest: 1910-0.53-0.95
    Ties: 2001, 2011
    Land and Ocean+0.78 +/- 0.10+1.40 +/- 0.182nd WarmestWarmest: 2010+0.80+1.44
    132nd CoolestCoolest: 1913-0.47-0.85
    Southern Hemisphere
    Land+0.47 +/- 0.11+0.85 +/- 0.2020th WarmestWarmest: 2005+1.05+1.89
    114th CoolestCoolest: 1893-1.00-1.80
    Ocean+0.48 +/- 0.04+0.86 +/- 0.0710th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.60+1.08
    124th CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.55-0.99
    Ties: 2011
    Land and Ocean+0.48 +/- 0.06+0.86 +/- 0.1112th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.63+1.13
    122nd CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.61-1.10



    Year-to-date (January-June)

     January-June 2012

    Following the dissipation of La Nina in April, record warmth over land during May and June and increasing ocean temperature anomalies pushed 2012 near the top 10 warmest status for the first half of the year. The combined global land and ocean average surface temperature for the January�June period was 0.52C (0.94F) above the 20th century average of 13.5C (56.3F), ranking as the 11th warmest such period on record. The greatest January-June warmth was observed over most of North America, southern Greenland, and most of Russia. The first half of 2012 was notably cooler than average across Alaska, Mongolia, and Australia.

    • Alaska had its 16th coolest January�June since records began in 1918, with a temperature 1.5C (2.7F) below the 1971-2000 average.

    Of note, the year-to-date global anomalies for 2012 have increased each month as the year has progressed and La Nina conditions waned - January: +0.35C (+0.65F); January-February: +0.37-C (+0.67-F); January-March: +0.39C (+0.70F); January-April: +0.46C (+0.83F); January-May: +0.50C (+0.90F), and JanuaryJune: +0.52C (+0.94F). The record for the warmest January-June was set in 2010, with a temperature that was 0.70C (1.26F) above average.

    2012%20year%20to%20date%20anomalies%20compared%20with%20five%20warmest%20years%20on%20record
    Global Year to Date Temperature Anomalies

    The January�June worldwide land surface temperature was 0.87C (1.57F ) above the 20th century average, marking the sixth warmest such period on record.

    The global ocean surface temperature for the year to date was 0.39C (0.70F) above average and ranked as the 12th warmest such period on record. This was the warmest monthly departure from average since August 2010.

    January�JuneAnomalyRank
    (out of 133 years)
    Records
    CFYear(s)CF
    Global
    Land+0.88 +/- 0.21+1.58 +/- 0.386th WarmestWarmest: 2007+1.19+2.14
    128th CoolestCoolest: 1893-0.85-1.53
    Ocean+0.39 +/- 0.04+0.70 +/- 0.0712th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.57+1.03
    122nd CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.51-0.92
    Land and Ocean+0.52 +/- 0.09+0.94 +/- 0.1611th WarmestWarmest: 2010+0.70+1.26
    123rd CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.50-0.90
    Northern Hemisphere
    Land+1.04 +/- 0.26+1.87 +/- 0.475th WarmestWarmest: 2007+1.38+2.48
    129th CoolestCoolest: 1893-0.96-1.73
    Ocean+0.38 +/- 0.05+0.68 +/- 0.099th WarmestWarmest: 2010+0.56+1.01
    125th CoolestCoolest: 1910-0.48-0.86
    Ties: 2006
    Land and Ocean+0.63 +/- 0.14+1.13 +/- 0.257th WarmestWarmest: 2007+0.81+1.46
    127th CoolestCoolest: 1893-0.59-1.06
    Southern Hemisphere
    Land+0.46 +/- 0.16+0.83 +/- 0.2917th WarmestWarmest: 2005+0.95+1.71
    117th CoolestCoolest: 1917-0.85-1.53
    Ties: 1993, 2001
    Ocean+0.41 +/- 0.04+0.74 +/- 0.0713th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.60+1.08
    121st CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.53-0.95
    Ties: 1999
    Land and Ocean+0.42 +/- 0.07+0.76 +/- 0.1313th WarmestWarmest: 1998+0.65+1.17
    121st CoolestCoolest: 1911-0.55-0.99
    Ties: 1988, 1992, 1999

     

    Images of sea surface temperature conditions are available for all weeks during 2012 from the weekly SST page.


    Precipitation

    The maps below represent anomaly values based on the GHCN dataset of land surface stations using a base period of 1961-1990. As is typical, precipitation anomalies during June 2012 varied significantly around the world.

     
     
     
     
    • Low pressure systems brought the United Kingdom its wettest June since national records began in 1910. England and Wales each tied with 1860 as the wettest June since their records began in 1766.

    • The Southwest Asian monsoon made its way northward across India during June. As of June 27th, the country as whole reported monthly rainfall that was 77 percent of the average amount received. Regionally, northwest India was just 37 percent of average, while east and northeast India was wetter than usual, at 104 percent of average. By the last week in June, the monsoon had reached central India.
    l
     
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 26 2012 at 9:03am

    Greenland ice sheet melted at unprecedented rate during July

    Scientists at Nasa admitted they thought satellite readings were a mistake after images showed 97% surface melt over four days

     
    Suzanne Goldenberg US environment correspondent
    guardian.co.uk,
     
    Greenland%20ice%20sheet%20composite.
    The Greenland ice sheet on July 8, left, and four days later on the right. In the image, the areas classified as 'probable melt' (light pink) correspond to those sites where at least one satellite detected surface melting. The areas classified as 'melt' (dark pink) correspond to sites where two or three satellites detected surface melting. Photograph: Nasa

    The Greenland ice sheet melted at a faster rate this month than at any other time in recorded history, with virtually the entire ice sheet showing signs of thaw.

    The rapid melting over just four days was captured by three satellites. It has stunned and alarmed scientists, and deepened fears about the pace and future consequences of climate change.

    In a statement posted on Nasa's website on Tuesday, scientists admitted the satellite data was so striking they thought at first there had to be a mistake.

    "This was so extraordinary that at first I questioned the result: was this real or was it due to a data error?" Son Nghiem of Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena said in the release.

    He consulted with several colleagues, who confirmed his findings. Dorothy Hall, who studies the surface temperature of Greenland at Nasa's space flight centre in Greenbelt, Maryland, confirmed that the area experienced unusually high temperatures in mid-July, and that there was widespread melting over the surface of the ice sheet.

    Climatologists Thomas Mote, at the University of Georgia, and Marco Tedesco, of the City University of New York, also confirmed the melt recorded by the satellites.

    However, scientists were still coming to grips with the shocking images on Tuesday. "I think it's fair to say that this is unprecedented," Jay Zwally, a glaciologist at Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Center, told the Guardian.

    The set of images released by Nasa on Tuesday show a rapid thaw between 8 July and 12 July. Within that four-day period, measurements from three satellites showed a swift expansion of the area of melting ice, from about 40% of the ice sheet surface to 97%.

    Scientists attributed the sudden melt to a heat dome, or a burst of
    unusually warm air, which hovered over Greenland from 8 July until 16
    July.

    Greenland had returned to more typical summer conditions by 21 or
    22 July, Mote told the Guardian.

    But he said the event, while exceptional, should be viewed alongside
    other compelling evidence of climate change, including on the ground
    in Greenland.

    "What we are seeing at the highest elevations may be a sort of sign of
    what is going on across the ice sheet," he said. "At lower elevations
    on the ice sheet, we are seeing earlier melting, melting later in the
    season, and more frequent melting over the last 30 years and that is
    consistent of what you would expect with a warming climate."

    Zwally, who has made almost yearly trips to the Greenland ice sheet for more than three decades, said he had never seen such a rapid melt.

    About half of Greenland's surface ice sheet melts during a typical summer, but Zwally said he and other scientists had been recording an acceleration of that melting process over the last few decades. This year his team had to rebuild their camp, at Swiss Station, when the snow and ice supports melted.

    He said he had never seen such a rapid melt over his three decades of
    nearly yearly trips to the Greenland ice sheet. He was most surprised
    to see indications in the images of melting even around the area of
    Summit Station, which is about two miles above sea level.

    It was the second unusual event in Greenland in a matter of days, after an iceberg the size of Manhattan broke off from the Petermann glacier. But the rapid melt was viewed as more serious.

    "If you look at the 8 July image that might be the maximum extent of warming you would see in the summer," Zwally noted. "There have been periods when melting might have occurred at higher elevations briefly - maybe for a day or so - but to have it cover the whole of Greenland like this is unknown, certainly in the time of satellite records."

    Jason Box, a glaciologist at Ohio State University who returned on
    Tuesday from a research trip to Greenland, had been predicting a big
    melt year for 2012, because of earlier melt and a decline in summer
    snow flurries.

    He said the heat dome was not necessarily a one-off. "This is now the
    seventh summer in a row with this pattern of warm air being lifted up
    onto the ice sheet on the summer months," he said. "What is surprising
    is just how persistent this circulation anomaly is. Here it is back
    again for the seventh year in a row in the summer bringing hot, warm
    air onto the ice sheet."

    He also said surfaces at higher elevation, now re-frozen, could be
    more prone to future melting, because of changes in the structure of
    the snow crystals. Box expected melting to continue at lower
    elevations.

    About half of Greenland's surface ice sheet melts during a typical
    summer, but Zwally said he and other scientists had been recording an
    acceleration of that melting process over the past few decades. This
    year his team had to rebuild their camp, at Swiss Station, when the
    snow and ice supports melted.

    Lora Koenig, another Goddard glaciologist, told Nasa similar rapid melting occurs about every 150 years. But she warned there were wide-ranging potential implications from this year's thaw.

    "If we continue to observe melting events like this in upcoming years, it will be worrisome." she told Nasa.

    The most immediate consequences are sea level rise and a further warming of the Arctic. In the centre of Greenland, the ice remains up to 3,000 metres deep. On the edges, however, the ice is much, much thinner and has been melting into the sea.

    The melting ice sheet is a significant factor in sea level rise. Scientists attribute about one-fifth of the annual sea level rise, which is about 3mm every year, to the melting of the Greenland ice sheet.

    In this instance of this month's extreme melting, Mote said there was evidence of a heat dome over Greenland: or an unusually strong ridge of warm air.

    The dome is believed to have moved over Greenland on 8 July, lingering until 16 July.

     
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2012 at 8:43am
    Lake Superior is so hot right now!

    By Philip Bump

    Lake Superior is the largest and northernmost Great Lake, containing almost three times as much water as Lake Michigan, the second largest in volume. In fact, it contains more water than the other Great Lakes combined. Which should mean that it�s cold.

    Calling it hotis a stretch but all of the water is heating up far more than expected. From Climate Central (Which is also the source of the chart)

    As the above chart shows, based on the 30-year average, the lake�s average water temperature should be in the mid-50s. But thanks to scant lake ice cover this past winter, along with a rare March heat wave and warmer-than-average weather since then, the lake began warming earlier than normal, and that warming has kept right on going. Wintertime ice cover on the Great Lakes was the lowest observed since such records began in 1980.

    The chart itself is pretty amazing. At no point in 2012 has the surface temperature been below average, and it�s now spiking well above. Temperatures today range from 70 degrees at the southern shore to 60 at the northern-most points.

     
     
    The Whole Article Below
     
     
     
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2012 at 10:20am

    Former Global Warming Skeptic Makes a 'Total Turnaround'

    by Natalie Wolchover  Date: 30 July 2012
     
     
    A prominent scientist who was skeptical of the evidence that climate change was real, let alone that it was caused by humans, now says he has made a "total turnaround." Richard Muller, a professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley, says he has become convinced that "the prior estimates of the rate of warming were correct," and that humans are "almost entirely the cause" of that warming.
     
     

    Muller co-founded the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) team two years ago in order to independently assess what he viewed as questionable evidence of global warming. In a series of papers published last year, BEST presented their statistical analysis of 1.6 billion temperature reports spanning the last 200 years, controlling for possible biases in the data that are often cited by skeptics as reasons to doubt the reality of global warming.

    Their analysis indicated that global warming is real - that the average global land temperature has risen by 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit (1.4 degrees Celsius) since 1750, including 1.5 degrees F (0.9 degrees Celsius) in the past 50 years. The numbers closely agree with the findings of past studies by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NASA and others; but finally, they were rigorous enough to satisfy Muller.

     
    Now, in a brand new study that probed the causes of that warming, the BEST team says it has cleared from blame the natural variations in Earth's climate that so often get implicated by skeptics. Muller and his colleagues implicate carbon dioxide emissions by humans as essentially the sole cause of global warming.

     "The carbon dioxide curve gives a better match than anything else we've tried," he wrote Saturday (July 28) in a New York Times editorial. "Its magnitude is consistent with the calculated greenhouse effect - extra warming from trapped heat radiation. These facts don't prove causality and they shouldn't end skepticism, but they raise the bar: To be considered seriously, an alternative explanation must match the data at least as well as carbon dioxide does."

     
    That's a high bar indeed. In graphs released with the new study, a red line representing the atmoaspheric concentration of CO2 crawls across the decades almost exactly tracing the black line representing the observed warming of the Earth. [What Are Climate Change Skeptics Still Skeptical About?]

    By comparison, the study found that natural variability, including variations in the solar cycle, El Nino events and the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation (shifts in sea-surface temperatures that run in cycles), could have accounted for no more than 0.17 degrees Celsius of temperature variation - either warming or cooling - during the past 150 years. These natural forces are much subtler than the warming seen during the same time period.

    In fact, the new results indicate that humans have been warming the Earth for longer than climate scientists previously thought certain. "In its 2007 report, the [United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] concluded only that most of the warming of the prior 50 years could be attributed to humans," Muller wrote. "It was possible, according to the I.P.C.C. consensus statement, that the warming before 1956 could be because of changes in solar activity, and that even a substantial part of the more recent warming could be natural."

    Not so, according to the new findings; variations in solar activity have a negligible effect on Earth's temperature. The handiwork is almost all our own.

     "I embarked on this analysis to answer questions that, to my mind, had not been answered," Muller wrote. "I hope that the Berkeley Earth analysis will help settle the scientific debate regarding global warming and its human causes. Then comes the difficult part: agreeing across the political and diplomatic spectrum about what can and should be done."

     
     
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2012 at 9:09am

    State of the Climate

    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    National Climatic Data Center

     

    July 2012: hottest month on record for contiguous United States

    Drought expands to cover nearly 63% of the Lower 48; wildfires consume 2 million acres

    The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during July was 77.6F, 3.3F above the 20th century average, marking the hottest July and the hottest month on record for the nation. The previous warmest July for the nation was July 1936 when the average U.S. temperature was 77.4F. The warm July temperatures contributed to a record-warm first seven months of the year and the warmest 12-month period the nation has experienced since recordkeeping began in 1895.

    Precipitation totals were mixed during July, with the contiguous U.S. as a whole being drier than average. The nationally averaged precipitation total of 2.57 inches was 0.19 inch below average. Near-record dry conditions were present for the middle of the nation, with the drought footprint expanding to cover nearly 63 percent of the Lower 48, according the U.S. Drought Monitor.

     

     Significant climate events for July 2012. Click to enlarge, or click here for the National Overview.

    Note: The July Monthly Climate Report for the United States has several pages of supplemental information and data regarding some of the exceptional events from the month and season.

    U.S. climate highlights: July

    • Higher-than-average temperatures engulfed much of the contiguous U.S. during July, with the largest temperature departures from the 20th century average occurring across most of the Plains, the Midwest, and along the Eastern Seaboard. Virginia had its warmest July on record, with a statewide temperature 4.0F above average. In total, 32 states had July temperatures among its ten warmest, with seven states having their second warmest July on record.

    • Drier-than-average conditions continued across the Central Plains and Midwest during July. Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri had July precipitation totals ranking among their ten driest. Maine had its fifth driest July on record.

    • An active storm pattern in the Southwest contributed to California having its fifth wettest July on record and Nevada having its eighth wettest. Wetter-than-average conditions were also observed through the rest of the Southwest, along the western Gulf Coast, and through the Ohio Valley where West Virginia had its tenth wettest July.
    • The warm and dry conditions over a large portion of the country were associated with ideal wildfire conditions. Over 2 million acres were burned nationwide during July due to wildfires, nearly half a million acres above average, and the fourth most on record since 2000.
    • A list of select July temperature and precipitation records can be found here.

    Drought conditions update

    • The May-July months, an important period for agriculture, was the second warmest and 12th driest such three-months for the Lower 48, contributing to rapid expansion of drought. The central regions of the country were hardest hit by the drought, where ten states had three-month precipitation totals among their ten driest, including Nebraska, Kansas, and Arkansas which were record dry.

    feature

    • According to the July 31, 2012, U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM), 62.9 percent of the contiguous U.S. was experiencing moderate to exceptional drought at the end of July. This is an increase of about 6.9 percent compared to the end of June. The maximum value of 63.9 percent reached on July 24 is a record in the 13-year history of the USDM.
    • The area of the country in the worst drought categories (extreme to exceptional drought) doubled from 10 percent last month to 22 percent this month. The extreme dryness and excessive heat devastated crops and livestock from the Great Plains to Midwest.
    • The Primary Corn and Soybean Agricultural Belt, hard hit by drought, experienced its eighth driest July, third driest June-July, and sixth driest April-July (growing season) in the 1895-2012 record.
    • According to the Palmer Drought Severity Index, whose record spans the 20th century, about 57 percent of the contiguous U.S. was experiencing moderate-to-extreme drought in July. The last drought this extensive was in December 1956 when about 58 percent of the nation was in moderate-to-extreme drought.

    Year-to-date: January-July

    • The January-July period was the warmest first seven months of any year on record for the contiguous United States. The national temperature of 56.4F was 4.3F above the long-term average. Most of the contiguous U.S. was record and near-record warm for the seven-month period, except the Pacific Northwest, which was near average.

     


      Year-to-date temperature, by month, for 2012 (red), compared to the other 117 years on record for the contiguous U.S., with the five ultimately warmest years (orange) and five ultimately coolest years (blue) noted. The 2012 data are still preliminary. Please click for a more thorough explanation.

    • The first seven months of 2012 were drier than average, ranking as 15th driest January-July on record. Below-average precipitation totals were observed for a large portion of the country, with 12 states having January-July precipitation totals among their ten driest. Above-average precipitation was observed for the Upper Midwest and the Pacific Northwest.
    • The U.S. Climate Extremes Index (USCEI), an index that tracks the highest and lowest 10 percent of extremes in temperature, precipitation, drought and tropical cyclones across the contiguous U.S., was a record-large 46 percent during the January-July period, over twice the average value, and surpassing the previous record large CEI of 42 percent which occurred in 1934. Extremes in warm daytime temperatures (83 percent) and warm nighttime temperatures (74 percent) both covered record large areas of the nation, contributing to the record high year-to-date USCEI value.

    12-month period: August 2011-July 2012

    • The August 2011-July 2012 period was the warmest 12-month period of any 12-months on record for the contiguous U.S., narrowly surpassing the record broken last month for the July 2011-June 2012 period by 0.07F. The nationally averaged temperature of 56.1F was 3.3F above the long term average. Except Washington, which was near average, every state across the contiguous U.S. had warmer than average temperatures for the period.

     
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2012 at 3:34pm
    Been slacking on this post (Updates since July)
     

    August 2012   USA

    The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during August was 74.4°F, 1.6°F above the 20th century average, marking the 16th warmest August in a period of record that dates back to 1895.

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2012/8

     

    Global

    The average combined global land and ocean surface temperature for August 2012 was 0.62°C (1.12°F) above the 20th century average of 15.6°C (60.1°F). This is the fourth warmest August since records began in 1880.

    http://www.avianflutalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=26490&PN=22

     

     

    September 2012   USA

    The average contiguous U.S. temperature during September was 66.3°F, 1.5°F above the 20th century average, the 18th warmest such month on record. September 2012 marks the 16th consecutive month with above-average temperatures for the Lower 48.

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2012/9

     

    Global

    The average combined global land and ocean surface temperature for September 2012 tied with 2005 as the warmest September on record, at 0.67°C (1.21°F) above the 20th century average of 15.0°C (59.0°F). Records began in 1880.

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/9

     

     

    October 2012   USA

    The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during October was 53.9°F, just 0.3°F below the long-term average, ending a 16-month streak of above-average temperatures for the lower 48 that began in June 2011.

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2012/10

     

    Global

    The average combined global land and ocean surface temperature for October 2012 tied with 2008 as the fifth warmest October on record, at 0.63°C (1.13°F) above the 20th century average of 14.0°C (57.1°F). Records began in 1880.

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2012/10

     

     

    November 2012   USA

    The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during November was 44.1°F, 2.1°F above the 20th century average, tying 2004 as the 20th warmest November on record.

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2012/11

     
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 09 2012 at 7:47pm
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Elver View Drop Down
    Valued Member
    Valued Member


    Joined: June 14 2008
    Status: Offline
    Points: 7778
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2012 at 10:28pm

    We've never had to start watering our lawn here in Colorado until May, but our lawn was drying up in mid April.  We usually quit mowing by October 1st, but we mowed just before Halloween for what we thought was the last time, but then had to mow just before Thanksgiving again!  In June our home was ruined by the worst hail storm I've ever been in.  We had to get new shingles, new garage doors, exterior paint, 1 new window, and 4 screens. 

    We turned our sprinkler system on after Thanksgiving in order to water our lawn again because it has been really dry here.  We've since turned it back off again, but I've had to hand water our shrubs and trees or damage will occur.
     
    I live in the Denver area & a few years ago I saw 2 perfectly formed tornado's out our TV room window.  A few years prior to this I was only 3 miles from home & saw another tornado to the north and east.  I've lived here since 1972 & have never heard of tornados this close to Denver.
     
    This past summer was the worst fire season I can ever remember.  We had smoke all summer long.  After the Colorado fires were out we got the smoke from either the north west or New Mexico.  We  normally have a terrific view of the mountains from our deck, but couldn't see them most of the summer.  We like to sit on the deck at night during the summer, but it was way too hot this year.
     
    Based on how warm it has been so far this fall, I'm concerned that it will be bad next spring and summer too.
     
    I wasn't sure I believed in global warming, but the charts you've pasted above make me think otherwise.  The only other explanation would be that we have cycles greater than 100+ years since record keeping began.  I'm thinking that the world shouldn't bet on this though.
     
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2012 at 6:09pm

    I hear you Elver

    Its getting to the point where its in your face (Hard To Ignore) 
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2012 at 6:10pm

    November 2012 global temperatures were fifth highest on record

    The globally-averaged temperature for November 2012 marked the fifth warmest November since record keeping began in 1880. November 2012 also marks the 36th consecutive November and 333rd consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century average.

     
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Elver View Drop Down
    Valued Member
    Valued Member


    Joined: June 14 2008
    Status: Offline
    Points: 7778
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2012 at 12:01am
    I believe it.  We've had the warmest November that I can ever remember here in Colorado. 
     
    I put Denver's preciption into a spreadsheet and graphed it.  It looked like we've had lower than average precipition for 19 of the past 21 years.
     
    I've read that Lake Mead might be dry by 2021.  In my earlier post I mentioned that we in the Denver area have been on water rationing for some years now, but it doesn't seem like the people in Vegas or Los Angeles care about water rationing.  Our water on the front range goes primarily to agriculture also, but we still have to watch what we use.  I don't understand why anyone out west is allowed to fill up their swimming pools with Lake Mead drying up.  It is down 99 feet and is only 52.57% full.
     
    I guess nobody really cares about this, but one day it will be too late.  Food shortages will be a really nasty side effect to this.
    Back to Top
    Mahshadin View Drop Down
    Admin Group
    Admin Group
    Avatar

    Joined: January 26 2006
    Location: United States
    Status: Offline
    Points: 3882
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2012 at 8:56am
    LOLCouldnt agree more Elver
     
    I will say that some people do make efforts. I live in Phoenix and I ration water, I dont have to do it, but it sure does save some money over a years time. I have found that most plants including grass has a starvation mode where the plant basically shuts off or more acurately goes in to slow motion. It is a pain but I do it anyway. Everything here is on auto pilot, they should put the controls on the inside of the house, so perhaps people might notice they have some control over it. Sometime I wont water for 2 weeks or more if we get a litttle sprinkle. Funny thing is it had nice side effects, now I only have to cut the grass once a month instead of every week or every other week (Less Work). Your right though most people just let the auto-pilot do its thing twice a day.
     
    Pools are a whole different animal. I deem a pool a must for where I live and how quickly water could become scarce. I can turn my pool into usable water in a mater of hours, worste case a few days. As far as filling pools, it isnt neccessary all that often if you take the time to balance the water chemistry throughout the year (PH). Hardness is the one thing that gets you here, at some point the pool will require a flush. And once emptied you can not just leave it there empty, big trouble in little china (Expensive Mistake). This also gives me a healthy supply of chlorine, acid, and baking soda which all have multiple uses in a SIP type situation. This time of year its not a big deal, once the water temp goes low enough its pretty self-sustaining with little adjustments here and there. Most people use to much chlorine in the water or just have a pool service that drops by once a week to once a month. Tried this, but the workers they sent didnt have a clue about water chemistry they just used the little stick tester adjusted the chlorine and left after clenaing the floor. I also cut back on cycle time which isnt a problem either, this saves a lot on electricity in the winter. It is just not neccessary to cyle the pools water (Turns) in the winter
     
    Funny story, my sister lives with me right now and she has 2 poodles, they think there in charge when we go outside barking a throwing a big fusss everytime. We just had first frost of the year and the pool water is quite cold (Stinging cold). So its morning and I am just getting up have cup of coffee in one hand and my laptop in the other, so I open the sliding door and the poodles go flying out and one forgets to turn and runs right into the pool. It was funny because the dog had a moment where he was stil in the air and looked back at me with shear panic in his eyes (Plush). I dont know if this dog found some super special energy or somthing but he hits the water goes under and then springs up out of the water atleast 6 to 12 inches and does another pitiful help me look. All this happens in like 3 seconds, just waking up I threw the the laptop and coffee on the table spilling the coffee on the laptop, now I have a choice, save the laptop or the dog. I find the big net get the dog out and he is like a very large shaking ice cube. The only casualty was the net was ripped. Dog lived, and laptop was closed so didnt get inside before I could get to it. 
     
     
    LOL
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
    Back to Top
    Guests View Drop Down
    Guest Group
    Guest Group
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2012 at 10:10pm
    Elver, yes I too am concerned...way too warm for Colorado all year. We are going to have the dust bowl all over again I fear. That is why I have 2 years of wheat to make bread.

    If you want to blame global warming then blame, China, and emerging third world countries not just America. Europe does it's part also.

    If this is man made heat well we may be doomed. We have gotten away from God and he may turn his back on us. I pray not but look all around us...you make your own conclusions.
    Back to Top
    carbon20 View Drop Down
    Moderator
    Moderator
    Avatar

    Joined: April 08 2006
    Location: West Australia
    Status: Offline
    Points: 65816
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote carbon20 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2012 at 12:43pm
    hi all

    dont worry the only way to cut greenhouse gases by 50% is to cull 75%

    OF THE WORLDS POPULATION or stop at home for 3.5 days of the week and do

    nothing at all not even make a coffee , we are all to blame we just

    waste waste waste, the size of some people here in Australia they are

    so FAT thats why they need enormous cars to move there bodies around

    think about how you would curb your carbon footprint??

    7 billion people on the planet , we are putting a billion more people on

    this small planet every 7 years now, from 1800's to now the population

    has risen 5 billion people , before that the population for 2,000

    years stood at about 2 billion, it took 100 years to get to 3 billion

    now a billion every 7 years and going up faster and faster,

    what is the answer ????

    Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.🖖

    Marcus Aurelius
    Back to Top
    Elver View Drop Down
    Valued Member
    Valued Member


    Joined: June 14 2008
    Status: Offline
    Points: 7778
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2013 at 6:18pm
    Thank the Vatican & Catholics for the population explosion. 
     
    The Vatican is a giant men's club who tell people that they can't get a divorce or use birth control.  Yet, none of these old men have ever been married or had kids.  None of these old men know what it is like to be abused by a husband, leave the bastard, and then have to support the kids on a salary that is typically way lower than a man's salary.  This men's club likes to tell us what to do, but they aren't living in the real world, now are they?
     
    What we need is more birth control of all varieties and less of the Catholic church.
    Back to Top
    Guests View Drop Down
    Guest Group
    Guest Group
    Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2013 at 8:05pm
    Officials say the number of cases of whooping cough in Colorado have not been this high since 1948, when 1,833 cases were reported.

    Many people in Colorado who have had the vaccine have gotten ill. So had the virus changed? I bet it has.

    We have too many people in the world...one day something is going to kill lots of us. Just a matter of time.
    Back to Top
     Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5678>
      Share Topic   

    Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down