Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Facts on Flu vaccination
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

Facts on Flu vaccination - Event Date: September 30 2012 - September 30 2013

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Turboguy View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: October 27 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 6079
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Turboguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 21 2012 at 10:41am
Originally posted by Elver Elver wrote:

Turbo,
 
The data points to the FACT that flu shots for healthy adults do nothing.  You will get the flu anyway and simply blame it on the shot not protecting you from the right flu.
 
If there are bad things in sex then it has surely more to do with you than me.
 


bull****e

Plants crave electrolytes, Brawndo has electrolytes, Brawndo has what plants crave! What are electrolytes? They're what they use to make Brawndo! But plants crave water! I've never seen no plant growing out of no toilet!

Plants crave Brawndo.

This is a circular argument with someone that is either genuinely misled or actually ignorant. Every time this topic comes up the anti vaccine people are resoundingly trounced, and you come back with the same garbage argument.

Mahshadin posted what I like to call facts and destroyed your argument on mercury level.

So if the shot will not protect you from the Flu, how many different strains go around the world per year?

Bearing that in mind, how many strains do they include in said shot?

If they include three strains, let's say, H1N1, H1N2 and H1N3 and everyone gets the shots protecting them from those three, but H1N4 is what goes around because nobody is protected from that, did the vaccine work?
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views. - William F. Buckley
Back to Top
Elver View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: June 14 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7778
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 21 2012 at 9:50pm
I guess when you believe something firmly enough you just ignore the facts such as the mercury levels that I posted on this years flu shots.  The mercury levels that I posted are current.   Thimerosal is still in bulk vaccines. 
 
Hopefully, you will read this.  The debate goes on & while it does I'm not going to let them inject me with this stuff.
 
You also ignored the fact that formaldehyde is in these flu shots & it is a known carcinogen.
 
A master study has shown that the flu shots are ineffective for healthy adults.  Again, you choose to ignore the facts, choosing only to believe what you have already been brainwashed to believe.
 
You also chose to ignore the fact that the studies that show an efficacy rate were sponsored by the same vaccine companies that are selling you this stuff.
 
I haven't formed my opinions from the 10:00 news, but from tons of articles I read on-line.  These articles have also come from JAMA.
 
Read this.
 
The bottom line is this.  Flu shots are more PR than science.  The flu isn't a major cause of death here in the U.S. or anywhere else.
 
Also, how could you have forgotton that Baxter sent live H5N1 flu virus in their vaccine?  All they said was; "OOPS!"
 
If you read nothing else, read this.
 
 
 
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 22 2012 at 10:29am

Elver

If you were truly concerned about Mercury levels you wouldn't be talking about vaccines which you only get once a year and you have the option should you choose to get one without. You are being mislead by people who take a tidbit fact and then use it to further their agenda my misrepresenting the facts which is whats going on here.

 

Mercury levels have been on the rise for more than 50 years a 30% increase and is going up fast, is this because of vaccines, of course not you are trying to make this the problem and if you broke it down it would be less than 1/2 of 1/2 of 1% of the problem. But this is what people with an agenda do, take a smidgen of fact and twist it up down all around to fit there agenda. If you were really concerned about Mercury exposure and ill health affects than you would be much more concerned about coal and boiler fired plants around the world which account for 70 % of the rise in mercury in our environment. These facilities throw up massive amounts of mercury in to the atmosphere which in turn settles on our land, fresh water lakes and streams, and a large amount ends up in the oceans. Once on the land and in our lakes and rivers microorganisms take up the inorganic substance and convert it to methyl mercury (That's the really toxic one for humans and animals). From there it makes its way up the food chain via animals and plants and ultimately on to your dinner plate. This is an actual problem that actually is a measurable problem (Wheres the Outrage). Instead you come on here and squawk about a vaccine which would account for an amount that's not even worth mentioning when discussing the actual problem of toxic methyl mercury which is growing year in and year out, thus committing a form of slow suicide for  our children and grandchildren and all future generations.

 

But hey lets talk about vaccines YUP That's the problem!!!

 

 

 

 

 

Theres a couple other things I would like to address about this thread as well and I even think some of them were made by so called Health Professionals.

 

First the comments about actual Flu deaths, anyone with half a brain and has been following any actual research on this subject knows full well that it is not the flu that kills people. It is the medical conditions or organ failures caused by the flu that take people out (ARDS, Pneumonia, and others) and ultimately are the cause of death. This is well known and well documented and accepted fact by the entire medical community across the world. Again this is an agenda based conversation that takes a smidgen of facts twists it up down and all around till they get the conversation they want to prove the agenda they started out with before it began. And I would also add that it is absolutely shameful for anyone who has actually been trained as a Medical Professional to come on here fear mongering the facts in this way. I trust most of you who have been on here since the beginning and have read the actual medical findings on this subject quickly identified this as Fear Mongering and an outright Twisting of facts for an agenda based outcome.   Again (SHAME ON YOU)!!!!!!

 

Second is this BS that vaccines don't stop or cure the flu. This is just another example of twisting of actual facts in to an agenda based conversation. No one ever said that a flu vaccine was the cure, not once not ever. And that is not the purpose of the vaccine. If you have followed flu vaccine facts and research you would know this as I bet most of you on this board for any length of time do. The vaccine is intended to invoke an immune response in the body thus creating antibodies so your body will recognize and begin the process of healing before it gets out of control and kills you. Now that's an over simplification but it is factual in the way it works and was intended. Anyone trained in the Medical profession should know this and if you don't its time for you to get out and find a different career, maybe conspiracy theororist I hear theres a lot of money in that profession and even schools popping up around the country!!!!!      Again Shame On You

 

 

 

OK

I have said my peace on this subject and that will be the last comment on this I will make. If you continue to be fear mongered that's your chioice!!!!!

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Turboguy View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: October 27 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 6079
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Turboguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 22 2012 at 5:13pm
Originally posted by Mahshadin Mahshadin wrote:

<Hard hitting point after hard hitting point>


Well said.
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views. - William F. Buckley
Back to Top
Elver View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: June 14 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7778
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 22 2012 at 8:48pm
Mahshadin,
 
The pharmaceutical companies are the only ones with an agenda!
 
People once thought that blood letting and shock therapy were good things also.
 
There are thousands of articles in the medical journals regarding the bad effects of innoculations.  Why is this?  It is something that your "half a brain" refuses to deal with.
 
If mercury in flu shots was a good thing, then why has there been a concerted effort to eliminate mercury from all vaccines.  This happened only because scientists looked into it!
 
When a "master study", which is a study of previous studies, points out the fact that flu shots are ineffective in healthy adults, why does your "half a brain" not want to look into this further?
 
"The 2009 influenza A(H1N1) "swine flu" vaccine, which was administered to millions of people around the world, is associated with a "small but significant risk" of Guillain-Barré Syndrome"
The article goes on to say that the benefits outweigh the risks.  (If you are the one to come down with Guillain Barre Syndrome you'd probably disagree!)
 
"According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD (http://members.aol.com/nitrf), the world's leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals), if an individual has had five consecutive flu shots between 1970 and 1980 (the years studied) his/her chances of getting Alzheimer's Disease is ten times higher than if they had one, two or no shots. I asked Dr. Fudenberg why this was so and he said it was due to the mercury and aluminum that is in every flu shot (and most childhood shots).  The gradual mercury and aluminum buildup in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction.  Is that why Alzheimer's is expected to quadruple? Notes: Recorded from Dr. Fudenberg's speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington, VA September, 1997.  Quoted with permission. Alzheimer's to quadruple statement is from John's Hopkins Newsletter Nov 1998."
 
The research shows that the flu vaccine does not affect the number of deaths from the flu or its complications.  It also shows that it doesn't affect missed days off of work.  Can you show me your source on this? 
 
 
Michael Osterholm from the UM Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy analyzed more than 12,000 peer-reviewed studies, documents, transcripts, and notes dating back to the 1930s, and found that there was very little solid evidence that the flu shot provides any real protection for most people.
http://www.naturalnews.com/037620_flu_vaccines_effectiveness_exaggerations.html
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 23 2012 at 7:01pm

Elver

Once again you just refuse to acknowledge facts and insist on pushing this delusional Bullship.

 

First Dr Michael Osterholm is not a Anti Vaccine advocate as you have portrayed him to be, quite the opposite. And he had made several comments trying to address this delusional and outright misinformation that has been attached to his Good Name. It is you who needs to do some reading but if you insist on getting your information form snake oil salesman than you should expect deception.

Read the actual report and you will find none of the delusional BS you are pushing on this thread (Vaccines are not effective). He simply stated that the effectiveness of vaccines which ranges below 60% for seniors to as high as 83% for children can and should be improved and put this challenge on government and industry to acknowledge that there is room for much improvement.

Read the actual report rather than just accepting others with an agenda to feed you the information they want you to hear.

http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/files/80/ccivi%20report.pdf

Dr Osterholm comment this week on flu vaccine

“It’s the best protection we have,”

As far as the other guy (Hugh Fudenberg)  you hold up as a god of information the man is a fraud and has been stripped of his medical license for engaging in dishonorable, unethical, or unprofessional conduct and forced in to retirement. And those hundreds or thousands of peer reviewed comment was on a bogus site and a bogus medical journal. Do you not even check this stuff out. Just swallow it whole and start preaching it to everyone else.

Wake up the con is on but its not everyone else its you

The first step in not being conned is to admit and accept responsibility for the times when you have been conned.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Elver View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: June 14 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7778
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 23 2012 at 8:20pm
According to your "actual report" I'm left in disbelief that you may not have even read this!
 I've quoted some of what I felt was pertinent to my belief's in efficacy vs. safety.
 
"evidence for protection in adults 65 years of age and older with TIV is lacking. Evidence is also limited regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of TIV in children age 2 to 17 years. LAIVs have consistently shown highest efficacy in young children (from 6 months to 7 years old), while evidence of protection is not available for individuals from 8 to 59 years of age."
 
"Hundreds of influenza vaccine efficacy and effectiveness studies have been conducted since the 1940s. The design of these studies has varied widely, with most not meeting minimal requirements for unbiased recruitment and outcome ascertainment,"  (I would have to say that these biased studies were done by the pharmaceutical companies themselves.)
 
"even though TIV provided some protection for healthy adults 18 to 65 years of age, there is a paucity of evidence for protection in adults 65 years of age and older.  Evidence is also limited to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of TIV in children age 2 to 17 years. LAIVs have consistently shown highest efficacy in young children (from 6 months to 7 years old), while evidence of protection is not available for individuals from 8 to 59 years of age"
 
"However, evidence for consistent high-level protection is elusive for the present generation of vaccines, especially in individuals at risk of medical complications or those aged 65 years or older."
 
"highest-risk groups for severe morbidity and mortality for both pandemic and seasonal influenza includes persons 65 years of age and older, children younger than 2 years of age, pregnant women, and people of any age who have certain medical conditions"
 
"herd immunity had a negligible impact on mortality"
 
"mortality reduction for influenza vaccine use in persons 65 years of age and older indicate that mortality is reduced by a maximum of only 5%"  "Our estimate of fewer than 33,000 deaths with maximum vaccine coverage over 31 years is not the “millions of lives” that some sources have suggested."
 
"Most studies since the 1940s that have assessed influenza vaccine efficacy or effectiveness have relied on suboptimal methodology, such as potentially biased participant recruitment and using HAI and nonspecific clinical end points, thus making the results difficult to

interpret. The few remaining studies, which provide the highest quality of evidence to assess the true impact of influenza vaccines, have found a level of protection lower than that often attributed to the vaccine."

Dangers listed below are deemed to be acceptable unless of course it happens to you!
"Concern has been raised regarding the risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following influenza vaccination as a result of the increased rates of GBS seen in 1976 during the swine flu vaccine campaign (see below). GBS is a relatively rare neurologic disorder that can occur as a complication of certain conditions, including some infections."
 
"In the spring of 2010, an increased rate of febrile seizures was detected in Australia and New Zealand in children younger than 5 years of age who had received the seasonal influenza vaccine produced by CSL Limited.21,22 This vaccine was used primarily in Australia and New Zealand"  (as a result it was recommended that it not be used in children under age 8 AFTER THE FACT!)
 
"In the fall of 2010, an increased rate of narcolepsy was observed in several EU countries among persons receiving the A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza vaccine.30The vaccine, Pandemrix, an adjuvanted vaccine, was manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline and used only in Europe, although a similar vaccine was used in Canada.31"
 
Of course the summary depicts that vaccines as safe except in rare instances.  (How would you like to be one of those unlucky people and end up having something horrible simply because you are a healthy person who didn't want to bother with having the flu for 3 days?)
 
How would you have liked to receive Baxter's vaccine with live H5N1 in it? 
 
It's clear that we both have different risk tolerances here and nothing I can say will change your mind, so by all means get yourself vaccinated!  I think they sum it up nicely:
 
"Despite this excellent safety record, the legacy of the three unusual adverse events outlined above (particularly 38 the absence of a cause for the increased incidence of GBS associated with administration of H1N1 vaccine in 1976) demonstrates the importance of ongoing population-based adverse event monitoring for new influenza vaccines as they become available."
 
Be their guinea pig if you want to, but I'm not being "conned" by anyone!
Back to Top
Turboguy View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: October 27 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 6079
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Turboguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2012 at 2:01pm
Quote
Of course the summary depicts that vaccines as safe except in rare instances.  (How would you like to be one of those unlucky people and end up having something horrible simply because you are a healthy person who didn't want to bother with having the flu for 3 days?)
 
So your odds are one in what, a couple hundred million? I'll take those odds.
 
Don't get the vaccine. I will and we'll both be protected because I went and got it and so did the thousands of people you came in contact with today.
 
And the Flu isn't just kind of crappy for three days. It's Farking DEBILITATING for a week. I'm a fitness nut who runs five miles a day for fun, hit the gym four times a week for two hours at a crack, can bench 210, run a mile and ahalf in 10:00 flat on a formerly broken leg, at 6'1" and 185 train Krav Maga my other two days a week and the flu absolutely kicked my ass. I couldn't even get *INTO* bed. It would have absolutely killed a lesser man.
 
No, I'll avoid that crap or at the very least significantly reduce my chances of getting that crap again as much as I can. You act like they're potentially injecting you with Hydrochloric acid.
 
You should honestly stop this one while you're ahead. Mahshadin's just having fun with you at this point.
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views. - William F. Buckley
Back to Top
Elver View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: June 14 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7778
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 25 2012 at 5:46pm
Turbo,
 
Suit yourself.  I don't really give a crap whether you get a flu shot or not.  I was only trying to present evidence that might make people think twice.  Apparently, you've been sufficiently brainwashed to believe otherwise.  I'm not going to comment further on this thread.
Back to Top
Turboguy View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: October 27 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 6079
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Turboguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2012 at 5:05pm
Already got one. Seems I didn't die and I got it from the military! (dun dun DUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!!)
 
It seems that yes, those evil medical professionals known as "Doctors" have me eating out of their hands.
 
What'll they tell me next? That drinking water will significantly reduce the chances that I become dehydrated!?!
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views. - William F. Buckley
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 05 2012 at 11:48pm
All this debate is great but read what Suzi16 wrote today:

"Me, Hubby, 4 grandkids and their parents all had it Thanksgiving week. We fell like dominos. Hubby and 1 grandchild was tested. Type A. Hubby was the sickest. Got Tamiflu within 48 hours on Sat, was a little better by Wed and thought he was dying on Thur. Got a z-pac just in case and was better by Mon. Dr said to get the vaccine because we can still get Type B."

I have a friend that was out 10 days with the flu and she couldn't get the vaccine fast enough because her Doc said the same thing Suzi16's Doc said. My friend was like lots of you, "I never get a flu shot." Bet she will get one early next year!
Back to Top
8bit View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: March 26 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 8bit Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2012 at 6:37am
How in the hell can anyone actually believe that doctors and nurses would give their family and loved-ones a shot that would cause lasting damage? If you honestly think that every doctor and nurse in the country is behind some kind of conspiracy, you need to remove your tinfoil hat.

Just pray that you don't get sick. That'll do it. No need in trusting in science. </sarcasm>

This site has lost all credibility IMO.

Back to Top
Elver View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: June 14 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 7778
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 10 2012 at 10:44pm
Many doctor's push getting the vaccine, but don't get it themselves. 
 
In fact I was in a neurologists office when the doctor had to take a consultation call from another doctor who had a baby suffering from convulsions.  I overheard him ask when this baby was innoculated and much discussion ensued afterwards about that.
 
The problem with lasting damage is that it may not show up for years.  If you're good with that, then by all means, get vaccinated.
 
You might want to watch this video first.
 
Or these.  (Monkey virus, SV40, caused cancer tumors in hamsters.)
 
Since this time Baxter shipped vaccines around the world containing live H5N1 virus.  Why don't you Google that!
 
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down