Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Off topic- the Crackpot test- could not resist Posted: July 22 2008 at 4:22pm |
Okay, I must admit after thousands of dismal posts I am allowed one humorous one okay. This gets so very serious. Now understand surely, like most horrorscopes, I think every researcher and scientist can find just a little touch of this in something they have published or posted. And not to say this test is even valid... but it was funny to me in the deepest intellectual way - and I think you might enjoy dustiing away the dead bird feathers and chuckling, because it is funny. The Crackpot Index
John Baez
A simple method for rating potentially revolutionary contributions
to physics:
- A -5 point starting credit.
- 1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false.
- 2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous.
- 3 points for every statement that is logically inconsistent.
- 5 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful
correction.
- 5 points for using a thought experiment that contradicts the results
of a widely accepted real experiment.
- 5 points for each word in all capital letters (except for those
with defective keyboards).
- 5 points for each mention of "Einstien", "Hawkins" or "Feynmann".
- 10 points for each claim that quantum mechanics is fundamentally
misguided (without good evidence).
- 10 points for pointing out that you have gone to school, as if this
were evidence of sanity.
- 10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying
how long you have been working on it. (10 more for emphasizing that
you worked on your own.)
- 10 points for mailing your theory to someone you don't know
personally and asking them not to tell anyone else about it, for
fear that your ideas will be stolen.
- 10 points for offering prize money to anyone who proves and/or
finds any flaws in your theory.
- 10 points for each new term you invent and use without properly
defining it.
- 10 points for each statement along the lines of "I'm not good at
math, but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone
to express it in terms of equations".
- 10 points for arguing that a current well-established theory
is "only a theory", as if this were somehow a point against it.
- 10 points for arguing that while a current well-established theory
predicts phenomena correctly, it doesn't explain "why" they
occur, or fails to provide a "mechanism".
- 10 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Einstein, or
claim that special or general relativity are fundamentally misguided
(without good evidence).
- 10 points for claiming that your work is on the cutting
edge of a "paradigm shift".
- 20 points for emailing me and complaining about the crackpot
index. (E.g., saying that it "suppresses original thinkers"
or saying that I misspelled "Einstein" in item 8.)
- 20 points for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel prize.
- 20 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Newton or
claim that classical mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without
good evidence).
- 20 points for every use of science fiction works or myths as if
they were fact.
- 20 points for defending yourself by bringing up (real or imagined)
ridicule accorded to your past theories.
- 20 points for naming something after yourself. (E.g., talking
about the "The Evans Field Equation" when your name happens to be
Evans.)
- 20 points for talking about how great
your theory is, but never actually explaining it.
- 20 points for each use of the phrase "hidebound reactionary".
- 20 points for each use of the phrase "self-appointed defender
of the orthodoxy".
- 30 points for suggesting that a famous figure secretly disbelieved
in a theory which he or she publicly supported. (E.g., that Feynman
was a closet opponent of special relativity, as deduced by reading
between the lines in his freshman physics textbooks.)
- 30 points for suggesting that Einstein, in his later years, was
groping his way towards the ideas you now advocate.
- 30 points for claiming that your theories were developed by an
extraterrestrial civilization (without good evidence).
- 30 points for allusions to a delay in your work
while you spent time in an asylum, or references
to the psychiatrist who tried to talk you out of your theory.
- 40 points for comparing those who argue against your ideas to
Nazis, stormtroopers, or brownshirts.
- 40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is
engaged in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its
well-deserved fame, or suchlike.
- 40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that
a modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on.
- 40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated,
present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more
points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked
your theories will be forced to recant.)
- 50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but
giving no concrete testable predictions.
MC
|
|
H2HPrep
Valued Member
Joined: March 14 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 325
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 22 2008 at 5:23pm |
Score is currently tied between OBama & Gore.
|
|
cgh18
Valued Member
Joined: November 28 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 142
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 24 2008 at 5:21am |
#38 100 points for blaming everything on librals, Clinton, Gore or Obama , when you know darn well we just had 8 years of some one else in charge and who seems to have done no wrong???
#39 100 points listening to Rush and quoting him like he's the only accurate source of information.
|
cgh
|
|
Guests
Guest Group
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 25 2008 at 10:40am |
LOL, thanks MC, pretty funny. I also like the addition from H2HPrep and cgh18.
Are there others who can add a #40 and so forth?
|
|
JArnier
Valued Member
Joined: June 08 2008
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 3
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 26 2008 at 12:31pm |
Why bring politics into this? H2H, did you even read the test? And cgh18, what do your two questions have to do with insane theories in physics?
|
|
H2HPrep
Valued Member
Joined: March 14 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 325
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 26 2008 at 1:18pm |
According to Gore, he invented the Internet.
OBama is going to Save the World.
|
|
JArnier
Valued Member
Joined: June 08 2008
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 3
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 26 2008 at 7:39pm |
You failed to answer my question, but I'll play your game. According to you Gore scores an 11. - 5 points to begin -1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false. -2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous. -3 points for every statement that is logically inconsistent.
Obama scores 11 along with Bush, McCain, Pelosi, Gingrich and just about every other politician in the world. Seeing as how neither the fascist liberals (yes, I know that is an oxymoron) money grubbing conservatives have claimed that Einstein is inherently incorrect, they probably won't score very high on this test.
Some people on this board want to make everything a devisive political issue, and I just don't see the need. Patients suffering from bipolar mania who are in the manic stage, are, unfortunately, not a key issue in the policies of thist country's government. Certainly this test is humourous (yes, I spelled it the British way, what of it?) regardless of one's political leanings, so let's focus on something that brings us all together when there is no need to tear us apart.
|
|
reality check
Valued Member
Joined: May 15 2007
Location: CANADA
Status: Offline
Points: 683
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: July 26 2008 at 9:32pm |
JArnier wrote:
You failed to answer my question, but I'll play your game. According to you Gore scores an 11. - 5 points to begin -1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false. -2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous. -3 points for every statement that is logically inconsistent.
Obama scores 11 along with Bush, McCain, Pelosi, Gingrich and just about every other politician in the world. Seeing as how neither the fascist liberals (yes, I know that is an oxymoron) money grubbing conservatives have claimed that Einstein is inherently incorrect, they probably won't score very high on this test.
Some people on this board want to make everything a devisive political issue, and I just on't see the need. Patients suffering from bipolar mania who are in the manic stage, are, unfortunately, not a key issue in the policies of thist country's government. Certainly this test is humourous (yes, I spelled it the British way, what of it?) regardless of one's political leanings, so let's focus on something that brings us all together when there is no need to tear us apart.
|
|
|