Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk |
Pelosi's joker/wildcard......ups the ante..... |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
carbon20 ![]() Moderator ![]() ![]() Joined: April 08 2006 Location: West Australia Status: Offline Points: 65816 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: December 26 2019 at 12:35pm |
SHARE
ANALYSIS Donald Trump impeachment reaches stalemate as Democrats make a strategic move By Washington bureau chief David Lipson Posted1 hour ago, updated9 minutes ago President Donald Trump speaks with his hands outstretched while sitting in a yellow chair. Republicans are now suggesting Trump needs to be given the opportunity to defend himself on impeachment.(AP/Evan Vucci) This time last year, Washington DC was crippled by the longest US Government shutdown in history, prompted by President Donald Trump's demand for $US5.7 billion ($8.2 billion) to build his US-Mexico border wall and the Congressional refusal to hand it over. The five-week impasse saw museums and national parks locked up over the holiday season, public servants forced to take out loans to feed their families and even several FBI investigations compromised. This festive season, another politically-motivated stalemate has gripped the capital: the President's impeachment trial, or more precisely, the possible lack thereof. Washington's moves and countermoves A policemen walks past a sealed-off Lincoln Memorial in Washington during the US government shutdown of October 2013. This time last year, the focus was on the Government shutdown.(Reuters: Jason Reed) After the House (the US equivalent of Australia's House of Representatives) voted to impeach Donald Trump for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress, the expectation was that the documentation outlining the articles, or charges, would be swiftly sent to the Senate, so the trial over whether to remove him from office could take place in January. Mr Trump's Republican allies in the Senate were preparing to give the charges short shrift, openly stating they didn't need to call a single witness and promising to vote against a White House eviction, regardless of what was (or wasn't) presented as evidence. Your cheat sheet for Trump's articles of impeachment We've annotated important phrases to help explain the key events and people that led to this moment. Read more They'd made up their minds to acquit the President of the impeachment charges, in the hope that would exonerate him of any wrongdoing, without the need to risk any new evidence coming to the surface. But the Speaker of the Democrat controlled House had a Joker up her sleeve. Nancy Pelosi revealed she was breaking with convention by withholding the impeachment articles, until the House and the Senate could agree on procedures for a "fair trial". The Democrats are using the delay to leverage their opponents into calling new witnesses and documents, in the hope it would hurt the President ahead of next year's election. Nancy Pelosi had a Joker up her sleeve.(AP: J. Scott Applewhite) By their calculation, even if the gambit fails and the stalemate continues, at least Mr Trump won't be able to claim vindication in the Senate. "President Trump blocked his own witnesses and documents from the House, and from the American people, on phony complaints about the House process," Ms Pelosi tweeted. "What is his excuse now?" Ever since the first whiff of impeachment months ago, Democrats have been playing a fairly straight bat. Now they've flicked the switch to raw politics. And the Republicans, who themselves openly stated they weren't even pretending to be impartial, are now screaming blue murder. "What right does Crazy Nancy have to hold up this Senate trial. None! She has a bad case and would rather not have a negative decision …" Mr Trump tweeted. Republican leader of the Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsay Graham also responded on Twitter: Republicans have moved a little… but so did Comey Quite a bit has unfolded in Washington in the last few weeks.(Reuters: Tom Brenner) From a position of not needing to call a single witness, Republicans are now suggesting Mr Trump needs to be given the opportunity to defend himself, although no-one believes the President would even consider actually taking the stand. In the meantime, new evidence has come to light. Trump's impeachment will end one of these five ways Predicting what happens next in impeachment is almost impossible. But when it ends, it'll be in one of these five ways. Read more Emails from a White House budget official show the Pentagon was ordered to freeze military funding to Ukraine just 90 minutes after Mr Trump's "do us a favour" phone call to President Volodymyr Zelensky. The White House told the Pentagon to keep the information "closely held" due to the "sensitive nature" of the directive, yet another sign Trump's top aids knew the request was politically explosive. None of Mr Trump's supporters are buying it. It seems the only thing that could convince Republican voters Mr Trump has done anything wrong is a secret tape of the President saying, "I am bribing you for my own personal gain". Perhaps that's because their preferred media outlets aren't saying much about the actual evidence or the reason it's a problem for the US going forward if allowed to go unchecked. Watching Fox News on the night Mr Trump was impeached, you'd be forgiven for thinking it was Ms Pelosi, Hunter Biden and the FBI being marched off to a Senate trial. To be fair, the pundits on Fox had some relatively juicy new material to work with. Largely buried in Australia under the weight of impeachment news, was a report scathing of the FBI's investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to interfere in the 2016 election. Former FBI director James Comey addressed the Horowitz report during the week.(AP: J. Scott Applewhite) The Justice Department's watchdog, Michael Horowitz, found the FBI probe was dysfunctional, rushed and included numerous doctored wiretap documents. In an interview on Fox News, fired FBI director James Comey was eventually cornered into a partial mea culpa. "I was overconfident in the procedures that the FBI and Justice had built over 20 years," he told host Chris Wallace. It fits perfectly with Mr Trump's claims the "deep state" was out to get him from the start. But despite the FBI's reprehensible malpractice, the Horowitz report also declared the blunders were not driven by a vendetta against the President. "We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced" the decision to open an investigation into Trump's 2016 campaign," the report concluded. That is not the final word. A tale of two reports The Attorney-General handpicked the man to conduct the second report into the Russia inquiry.(AP: John Bazemore, File) A second inquiry into the origins of the Russia inquiry is being conducted by John Durham, a federal prosecutor who was hand-picked by Attorney-General William Barr, one of the President's staunchest allies. And we already know it will reach a very different conclusion to the first report. In the hours after the Horowitz report landed, Mr Durham released a statement of his own. "Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector-General that we do not agree with some of the report's conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened," he said. He's essentially saying the FBI should not have opened the investigation into Mr Trump's campaign, based on the evidence it had at the time — a very different conclusion to Horowitz. In Trump's America, even supposedly impartial public servants are splitting down party lines. And that brings us back to the Senate. A masterstroke or a swing and a miss? What will history make of the Democrats' impeachment strategy?(AP: J. Scott Applewhite)) The Democrats appear to be making a clever political play in withholding the articles of impeachment. At the very least, it seems to be getting under the President's skin, if his Twitter activity is any indication. The problem is they can no longer attempt to claim the moral high ground. Everyone can see it for what it is, and voters couldn't be more fed up with political games. In years to come, the decision to withhold will either be seen as a masterstroke by Ms Pelosi or yet another air-swing by the Democrats, who have so far been outmanoeuvred on so many of their attacks against the President. Or perhaps, swamped by ever greater outrage, it'll just become another footnote, like last year's "historic" Government shutdown. Related Stories Trump blasts Christian magazine calling for his removal on 'blackened moral record' Your cheat sheet to understanding Trump's articles of impeachment ANALYSIS Impeachment was my first story as the ABC's Washington Bureau chief. Here are the big questions I'm asking now Analysis: 'What is his excuse now?': Pelosi's gambit has Republicans screaming blue murder ABC NEWS Newsletter Email Address First Name Connect with ABC News ABC Help © 2019 ABC |
|
![]() |
|
Technophobe ![]() Assistant Admin ![]() ![]() Joined: January 16 2014 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 88450 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
He will walk. The Republicans control the upper house and there can be no other outcome.
This will strengthen his hold on the electorate and might even ensure a second term with harder policies! I don't have to like it to predict it. He is no humanitarian. He (whilst not being a total racist) is both colour prejudiced and racially intolerant. He values money above people and by a huge margain. He controls the media and subverts the truth. His attitude to women horrifys me! But he is good at it. Most Americans have no idea how deep the control runs and financially America is doing well - for now. It will be years, maybe decades before the sand-built houses fall. His place in history will escape most of the crap he threw at the fan and that will scatter only after he is gone. But we as non-Americans have no say in that, nor should we; if we did, we could manipulate the system to America's detriment, as many foreign powers would love to do. So sit back and watch the show Carbon. No foreign power needs to manipulate the USA; they are doing it to themselves. I'm surprised Putin did not laugh himself into a fit. What a crying shame! |
|
![]() |
|
CRS, DrPH ![]() Expert Level Adviser ![]() Joined: January 20 2014 Location: Arizona Status: Offline Points: 26660 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Pelosi is tough as nails....she is under no obligation to pass these articles along for a trial, and now she is deep into Trump's brain!
I agree with her strategy, new information comes to light constantly.....she may yet come up with yet another article of impeachment. I personally think that treason, or comforting the enemy, fits. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-fume-over-dem-threat-of-new-impeachment-articles-time-to-cut-them-off |
|
![]() |
|
carbon20 ![]() Moderator ![]() ![]() Joined: April 08 2006 Location: West Australia Status: Offline Points: 65816 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just watching with interest,
There is no way Chump ,will be impeached while the Republicans have said they won't, as for new "evidence" the Republicans/Chump won't let certain people give "Sworn"statements , So Stalemate for Now..... Interesting..... Now let's get back to Tin Tin...lol |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |