Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - China and People's Rights
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

China and People's Rights

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: China and People's Rights
    Posted: March 05 2009 at 4:28pm
.
 
 
 
 
File:Pudong-night.jpg
 
Beautiful Country, but...
 
 
Christians do not practice religion freely in China.
 
 
 
 

...In 1995, while in Beijing for a UN conference, Mrs Clinton described China's one-child policy as a "violation of human rights".
 
 
 
 
 
"The Obama Administration effectively dismissed, devalued, and debased human rights - especially women's rights - in the People’s Republic of China," Smith said. "Now, today we learn that the Obama Administration and the democratic leadership is poised to lavishly fund the U.N. Population Fund with $50 million of U.S. taxpayer money. This - despite the fact that the UNFPA has shamelessly and systematically aided and abetted the Chinese government’s one child per couple forced abortion policy. That cruel, anti-family policy has made brothers and sisters illegal in China and murdered tens of millions of children and wounded countless Chinese women."
 
 
 
Wolf said Secretary Clinton's silence and assertion that we ought not raise human rights issues with repressive governments, because we know what they are going to say has far reaching implications.

.......................

 
Congressmen Smith, Wolf and Pitts Openly Question Secretary of State Clinton’s Remarks Regarding Human Rights in China
Posted Feb 25 2009
 
 
 
 
ChinaAid
Media Contact: Katherine Cason (267) 210-8278 or Katherine@ChinaAid.org
Washington, D.C. Contact: Jenny McCloy (202) 213-0506 or Jenny@ChinaAid.org
Website: www.ChinaAid.org and www.MonitorChina.org
Fax: (432) 686-8355
February 25, 2009
 

 
 
USA - ChinaAid just learned that Congressmen Chris Smith (NJ-4th), Frank Wolf (VA-10th) and Joe Pitts (PA-16), openly questioned U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's controversial remarks that the U.S. and China's relationship will be less focused on human rights. The following is an official press release issued by the Congressmen:
 
 
 
 
Congressional Human Rights Leaders: Hillary Clinton Signals Retreat on China Human Rights Under Obama
 
 
 
 
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congressmen Chris Smith (NJ-4th), Frank Wolf (VA-10th) and Joe Pitts (PA-16), leading human rights advocates in Congress, today openly questioned U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s controversial remarks over the past several days that the U.S.-Sino relationship will be less focused on human rights and more focused on economic cooperation, global warming and other issues.
 
 
 

 
 
During the July 2008 visit to Beijing, Smith and Wolf pressed for the respect of fundamental human rights. The Chinese secret police threatened eight human rights lawyers they had been planning to meet, and placed several of them under house arrest. The Congressmen asked the Chinese government to release 734 political prisoners in the international spirit of the Olympics. The plea was ignored.
 
 
Please Express your appreciation to the Congressmen:
Congressman Chris Smith (R-NJ):
http://chrissmith.house.gov/
Congressman Frank Wolf (VA-10th):
http://wolf.house.gov/
Congressman Joe Pitts (PA-16):
http://www.house.gov/pitts/
 
 
..................
 
 
Back to Top
coleyounger666 View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: January 22 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 149
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote coleyounger666 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2009 at 4:54pm
However, the rule has been estimated to have reduced population growth in the country of 1.3 billion by as much as 300 million people over its first twenty years.

but thats a good thing with the world resources rain forest, that is being depleted by china at a rapid pace now

http://news.mongabay.com/2008/0229-laurance_china.html

At least 80% of Chinese timber imports from Brazil, Cambodia, Cameroon, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Indonesia, Myanmar, Papua New Guinea, and the Solomon Islands are illegal, according to recent estimates, with somewhat lower values (50 to 60%) for Malaysia and Russia,"
Back to Top
coleyounger666 View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: January 22 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 149
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote coleyounger666 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2009 at 5:03pm
usa really needs to slow down more then china now
http://geography.about.com/od/obtainpopulationdata/a/uspopulation.htm
  • 2010 - 309,162,581
  • 2020 - 336,031,546
  • 2030 - 363,811,435
  • 2040 - 392,172,658
  • 2043 - 400,527,776 (the year of 400 million)
  • 2050 - 420,080,587

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 05 2009 at 7:03pm
The wealthy break the rule.
 
Population is one sad fact of many ...
 
It should make us think, when population becomes 3 times what it is now in the USA,
 
partly because we let in so many... we may have to lose many of the rights we enjoy.
 
The time before the tracking, will be written about and read to our ggggGrandchildren.
 
Many years ago, our people traversed this land at will with ease and privacy.
 
Well I'll tell you it shocked me, the comfort level of the college kids, accepting a level of
 
a lack of personal privacy that I am not nearly as comfortable with.  It will be our
 
generation to protest any stepping over the line (did we hear that Hillary had in mind to
 
make new privcy laws for citizens using the internet...making tracking a no no?)
 
 the young ones are getting used to it and will not protest.
 
..................................................
 
 
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down