Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - xx
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

xx

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: xx
    Posted: May 11 2006 at 8:24pm
xx
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 11 2006 at 8:55pm
Sam - reading this got me curious ... I found the following: -k
 
The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA) grants public health powers to state and local public health authorities to ensure a strong, effective, and timely planning, prevention, and response mechanisms to public health emergencies (including bioterrorism) while also respecting individual rights.

Developed through the Center with additional funding support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, MSEHPA has been used by state and local legislators and health officials nationwide as a guide for considering public health law reform in their states. An initial draft of the Act (as of October 30, 2001) was superceded by the Act's final version (as of December 21, 2001).

Legislative Status Update: Since its completion on December 21, 2001, the Center has been tracking state legislative activity related to MSEHPA. As of April 15, 2006, the Act has been introduced in whole or part through bills or resolutions in forty-four (44) states, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariannas Islands. Thirty-seven (37) states [AL, AK, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, LA, ME, MD, MN, MO, MT, NV, NH, NM, NC, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WI, and WY] and DC have passed bills or resolutions that include provisions from or closely related to the Act. The extent to which the Act's provisions are incorporated into each state's laws varies. For more information, please refer to the specific legislative bills or resolutions referenced in the MSEHPA State Legislative Activity Table and the MSEHPA Legislative Surveillance Table (both documents include information as of April 15, 2006).

For additional information about the MSEHPA, please see the links below:

Lawrence O. Gostin, et al. The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Planning for and Response to Bioterrorism and Naturally Occurring Infectious Diseases, 288 JAMA 622 (2002).

James G. Hodge, Jr., Lawrence O. Gostin, The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act - A Brief Commentary (January 2002).

National Conference of State Legislatures, The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: A Checklist of Issues (June 2002).

Model State Emergency Health Powers Act - Media Coverage (October 2002

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2006 at 4:30am
Click on the activity table link and you can follow just exactly your own state is handling this bill up to current time.  Not each state is voting in all points of it for their individual states.  Now, didn't I read somewhere else on this site, that the CDC is advocating info that is NOT conflicting in an emergency situation?  So, it seems to me that by EACH STATE passing different variations of this State Emergency Health Powers bill, conflicting info is going to be given out regarding how emergency meds are dispensed, quarantine issues,  how civilians are conscripted, distribution of supplies!  So would that create another set of troubles for bordering states .... say like PA & NJ , Utah & Nevada, Fla & Carolina -- one state has regs the other doesn't so people are crossing over to take advantage of what they can't get in their state (kinda like teens taking advantage of an earlier drinking age in a neighboring state!).  No wonder it's 4 years later and this is still in the works!-k
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down