Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > Latest News
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 659,887,218 deaths possible?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

659,887,218 deaths possible?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 659,887,218 deaths possible?
    Posted: January 24 2006 at 7:38am
Bird flu is coverstory on Newsweek

Newsweek’s bird flu coverstory is good, though with some of the sensationalism that the media can’t help but interject.

No one knows why the virus suddenly spread into Europe this year or what it portends, although epidemiologists consider it an ominous development. “Something has happened to the relationship between the virus and wild birds that hadn’t happened before,” Osterholm said. Nevertheless, the only immediately obvious threat was to Europe’s waterfowl and poultry farms.

I was under the impression that migratory birds brought it, and that the infections have been expected for some time.

An interesting comment from the CDC, inline with what I’ve read in other places.

Public-health officials, though, worry that there’s too much emphasis in the media on the size of the Tami-flu stockpile. “I think it’s a complete misdirection of energy to be so focused on the issue of stockpiling,” CDC director Julie Gerberding said in an interview Friday. “There is no evidence that it will make a difference if we are hit with a pandemic.”

One suspects that the underlying reason for Tamiflu stockpiles is that governments and populations want to be seen as doing something… anything.

This entry was posted on Monday, October 24th, 2005 at 7:49 am and is filed under Prevention/Preparation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Bird flu is coverstory on Newsweek”
Larry Wilson Says:

October 26th, 2005 at 1:00 pm
I agree completely with the CDC.

However, if one looks at the numbers of deaths from the Spanish Flu, about 1.7% of the infected, and compares that with H5N1 death rates so far (about 60%) the CDC numbers on deaths don’t add up.

We can expect over 1 billion deaths worldwide, though I can understand why the governments are not publicizing these numbers; the governments can do anything about the total numbers and to cause (more) panic now would not help anything.

Even if the governments of the world put an all out effort in, since migratory birds can carry the flu, and assume this remains true even after the flu acquires a gene to make it easily human-to-human transmissible, then no amount of quarantine will make much of a difference.

Housing is going to be really, really affordable!

One Response to "Bird flu is coverstory on Newsweek"
END OF ARTICLE



My opinion:

Actually I have heard the Spanish Flu death rate was 2.5% so why is the CDC saying the max. worldwide death count would be 150 million?

The world population counter is 6,598,872,189@ 10:15 A.M..1/24/06

Let's estimate 20% contract avian flu, that's 1,319,774,436.

Now let's estimate only 50% mortality compared to the present approx. 60%.

That's 659,887,218 deaths.

Any thoughts?

Mary Kay
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 24 2006 at 8:11am
Again, the mortality numbers you use are based upon those people who were sick enough to go to hospital.  They do not count the thousands or millions who were not sick enough to go to hospital.

BBC thinks something like 35% of the Chinese have antibodies to H5N1. That's almost Five-hundred Million(half a Billion people)

If so when did they have the illness?  Almost all of them will tell you that they don't remember ever being sick.
Back to Top
meewee View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: December 13 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 595
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote meewee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 24 2006 at 8:16am

Mary Kay;

Personally I would put the mortality rate higher just because of various factors. Such as 70% mortality rate among expecting mothers, 70-80% mortality among children. Poverty, and compromised immune systems would play heavily into the numbers also. Then there would be those who refused to consider that they or their families would be at risk. Also would these mortality rates include secondary death rates from Cholera, dysentery, starvation and those who survived the flu only to succumb to the results of the internal organ injuries caused by the flu?

Meewee

God Bless us all!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 24 2006 at 8:58am
I strongly concur with your assessment Meewee. As I consider Africa, I shutter. Their ongoing problems, constant famine issues with several countries in severe drought, add to that the diseases that compromise the immune system, AIDS, TB and malaria all spell disaster. I fear Africa will be hardest hit.

Joe I would appreciate it if you would elaborate on the Chinese antibody issue. I thought no one had immunity. If 500,000,000 have had it, why hasn't anyone died of it in previous years?
Educate me please. : )


Mary Kay
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 24 2006 at 11:13am
There is a thread on the  board about a BBC broadcast.

The posters are aghast over the reported 38% of people tested show antibodies for H5N1.  The only broad testing that I know that was done was in China and it was done years ago.  The exact date, I do not know, but could Google it if I could come up with the right search parameters

All this tells me is that there was some sort of mild H5N1 that spread in China at one time; OR, as others have suggested, China was preparing to use H5N1 is a biological weapon against the world and had started an aggressive vaccination program for their populace in advance. That sounds far fetched, but with totalitarian regimes, anything is possible. I was a Nuclear, Biological & Chemical Warfare Officer in the Navy and this is possible.  Not probable, but possible.

Could this new strain (of H5N1 that I call Sichuan Sheet) have escaped from a Biological Warfare Lab in western China?  Again, possible. Perhaps that is the reason why they refuse to release sequences from their most recent outbreaks in Mid 2005 to present.
Back to Top
Left Field View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: January 13 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 176
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Left Field Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 24 2006 at 12:10pm
Very interesting Joe, would it also be possible that the outbreak in Turkey was actually a man made event and not caused by a bird?
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 24 2006 at 12:21pm
It spread from China on wings with feathers.  The question is how did it start at Qinghai lakes? The sequences from China would tell the story, but they are not letting anybody see them..
Back to Top
Johnson View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: January 06 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 10
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Johnson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 25 2006 at 9:38am
Wild bird flu blame 'too hasty'

Governments across Europe are being too hasty in blaming the spread of avian flu on wild birds, says the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.

Many scientists say there is evidence wild birds are spreading the highly dangerous H5N1 strain of the virus.

But the RSPB says the trade in birds and the movement of poultry products is a more likely cause.

The charity said there are no migration routes that would take birds from China to Turkey at this time of year.

A spokesman for Defra said government scientists were monitoring the situation, including the migratory patterns of wild birds.

The World Health Organisation recently said viruses from Turkey’s first two human cases were virtually identical to those that killed 6,000 migratory birds in a nature reserve in central China.

But the RSPB’s conservation director Dr Mark Avery says that beyond doubt the trade in wild birds and the movement of poultry and poultry products, such as chicken manure used to fertilize fish farms, has led directly to the transfer of H5N1 across national boundaries.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4642008.stm

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 25 2006 at 10:10am
I believe there have been multiple modes of transmission.  We know that Wild Birds have the Qinghai Lakes strain of Bird Flu.  We know that as they migrated west that the virus spread west, too.  Logical conclusion is that the Wild Birds spread the virus.

BUT, there is always the possibility that the Wild Birds are the victims, too. Certainly, the transportation of infected chickens across international borders might have spread the virus, too.  That is the reason why  many countries have quarantine provisions for all manner of imported animals.
Back to Top
walkdog View Drop Down
advanced Member
advanced Member


Joined: January 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 28
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote walkdog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 25 2006 at 10:22am

http://www.who.int/csr/don/2006_01_25a/en/index.html

THIS IS VERY DISTURBING!!!!  Notice there's no evidence of this women being exposed to poultry.  Also, others have died in provinces with no report of diseased birds.  The truth is coming out. 

Avian influenza – situation in China – update 2

25 January 2006

The Ministry of Health in China has confirmed the country’s tenth case of human infection with the H5N1 avian influenza virus.

The case occurred in a 29-year-old woman from Chengdu City in the south-central province of Sichuan. She developed fever on 12 January and was hospitalized with symptoms of pneumonia. Authorities say her condition deteriorated rapidly, and she died on 23 January.

Information provided to WHO indicates that she was self-employed in a shop selling dry goods. No information on possible exposure to diseased birds as the source of her infection is presently available, but an investigation is under way. Close contacts have been placed under medical observation.

This is the second human case reported this year in China, both from Sichuan Province. The two Sichuan cases occurred in different prefectures located around 150 km apart. A confirmed outbreak of H5N1 in poultry began in late December in another part of the province. No outbreaks have been confirmed in the areas where the two human cases resided.

During 2005, Chinese agricultural authorities reported 32 outbreaks in poultry in 12 provinces, resulting in the culling of more than 24 million birds. The appearance of human cases in areas without reported poultry outbreaks is a cause for concern. WHO recommends that, in China, testing for possible H5N1 infection should be undertaken in all cases of severe respiratory disease having no alternative diagnosis, even when no poultry outbreak has been reported in the patient’s area of residence.

Of the ten cases confirmed in China, seven have been fatal. The cases have occurred in 7 provinces and regions: Anhui, Guangxi, Liaoning, Jiangxi, Fujian, Hunan, and Sichuan. No poultry outbreaks have been officially reported in two of these provinces.

walkdog
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down