Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > Latest News
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Mortality rate at epicenter of outbreak
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

Mortality rate at epicenter of outbreak

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Newbie1A View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2018
Location: Alberta
Status: Offline
Points: 11180
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Newbie1A Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Mortality rate at epicenter of outbreak
    Posted: March 19 2020 at 2:12pm

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/covid-19-mortality-was-14percent-in-outbreak-epicentre-study/ar-BB11pU7R?ocid=spartandhp

The novel coronavirus proved deadly in 1.4 percent of all people infected in the Chinese outbreak city of Wuhan, far lower than global estimates of the killer pandemic, researchers said Thursday.

COVID-19 cases are soaring, with more than 200,000 confirmed since cases emerged in Wuhan late last year. 

AdvertisementThe World Health Organization said this month that COVID-19 proves deadly in 3.4 percent of confirmed cases.But with limited testing capacity and confirmed cases likely to be towards the severe end of the spectrum, several experts have suggested the true mortality rate may be significantly lower. 

A team of researchers in China has now reviewed eight separate public and private data sources on COVID-19 in Wuhan, and believe they have come up with a more accurate mortality estimate.

These include: data on confirmed cases with no contact with the market where the outbreak originated; confirmed air passenger cases; age distribution of confirmed cases and deaths; and time between onset and death.

They found that the probability of dying after developing COVID-19 symptoms was 1.4 percent. 

"Estimation of true case numbers -- necessary to determine the severity per case -- is challenging in the setting of an overwhelmed healthcare system that cannot ascertain cases effectively," said the study, published in Nature Medicine.

As of February 29, mainland China had 79,394 confirmed COVID-19 cases and 2,838 deaths -- meaning 3.54 percent of patients diagnosed with the disease later died.

But the authors said that milder cases presenting few or no symptoms are missing from data sets, and suggested their estimates were a better way to view the virus and the problem it poses.

"The number of severe outcomes or deaths in the population is most strongly dependent on how ill an infected person is likely to become, and this question should be the focus of attention," they wrote.

- Age matters -

The analysis, led by Joseph Wu, a renowned epidemiologist at the University of Hong Kong, also examined the likelihood of death across age ranges.

Compared with those aged 30-59 years, those above 59 were roughly 5.1 times more likely to die after infection.

Those under 30 were 60 percent less likely to die than the median age group.

The authors concluded that the risk of contracting a moderate to severe infection increased roughly four percent per year among adults aged 30-60 years.

Chinese authorities undertook a near-total lockdown of Wuhan and the surrounding province of Hubei, confining more than 11 million people to their homes for weeks. 

They also constructed a new hospital in the city to deal with COVID-19 case loads.

On Wednesday China reported just one new domestic case, compared to over 1,000 per day at the epidemic's peak.

Wu said his estimates should help inform policymakers at a time when several European countries are undergoing lock downs.

"Estimates of both the observed and unobserved infections are essential for informing the development and evaluation of public health strategies, which need to be traded off against economic, social and personal freedom costs," he wrote.

If it's to be - it's up to me!
Back to Top
kaye kaye View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: February 27 2020
Location: ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 3290
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kaye kaye Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2020 at 2:21pm

Hard to understand Chinese studies, you have to wonder if they counted the ones they boarded up in their homes.


keep the joy
Back to Top
FluMom View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group

Valued Member Since 2006

Joined: February 03 2020
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Points: 14695
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FluMom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2020 at 2:24pm

Yes, we should all be in LOCK DOWN....NOW!  I don't get what people are doing out unless they are medical, sanitary, water, electric, or companies helping people with problems in their homes and people needing food or meds!!!  Get with it folks this needs to happen today!

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down