Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > Latest News
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - OT: Global Warming
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

OT: Global Warming

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Message
Dlugose View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: July 28 2006
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Points: 277
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dlugose Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 07 2006 at 12:09pm
When you get your compact fluorecent lights, if they break, or when you dispose of them keep in mind that they have small amounts of mercury and should have special disposal.  The room where they break should be well ventilated and children or pregnant women out of the way until after cleanup.
 
I have a hybrid and get 50 mpg year round, more in the summer.
Dlugose RN AAS BA BS Cert. Biotechnology. Respiratory nurse
June 2013: public health nurse volunteer, Asia
Back to Top
crystal View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 156
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote crystal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 07 2006 at 12:58pm
Dlugose - thanks for the info on the bulbs. What type of hybrid do you have?
peace
Back to Top
Heidi View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Heidi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 07 2006 at 1:43pm
Another result of climate change is that the Amazon is not receiving the rainfall that it normally gets (and needs) due to global wind patterns shifting and changing course. The Amazon is beginning to show drought distress. If the current trend continues we face the certainty that the rainforest will die. If it dries up and dies it will no longer be our earth's lungs. It will go from being a carbon dioxide sink to a major carbon dioxide emitter.  I believe it was stated in the Tom Brokaw show that if we lose the Amazon we will lose an ice cap.
Life is Good!
Back to Top
Never2late View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: April 30 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 247
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Never2late Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 07 2006 at 1:46pm
Today in the morning paper there was an article that said as tundra thaws it is releasing a bucket load of methane gas which is some X times factor worse that CO2 and the scientists are all worked up now because its going to real hot and then we'll all die. But then again, we are all going to die someday anyway so party on!!! Drink that beer while it can be chilled.   
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 07 2006 at 7:12pm
I may be wrong, but I seen to remember hearing something about there being ice-ages, then warming, then ice-ages, then warming in the history of Earth?
I have also heard the sun goes through cycles where it is hotter, then cooler.
The orbit of the Earth around the sun is not a constant circle, but slowly changes from a circle to an eliptical orbit.
I tend to doubt predictions of climate change when predictions of next months weather seems to be so difficult.
I also think the body heat from 6 billion people has as much effect on the global temperature as driving cars.
You are certainly free to dissagree with me, just as I am free to dissagree with you.
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 07 2006 at 9:01pm

Climate has always changed, why are we worried now and why does it have to be humans fault?


Answer:

Yes, climate has varied in the past and it has varied for many different reasons, some better understood than others. The present day climate change is very well understood and is different. Simply noting that something happened before without humans does not in any logical way show that humans are not causing it today.

For example, we see in ice core records from Antarctica and Greenland that the world cycled in and out of glacial periods over 120Kyr cycles. The cause for that climate cycle's timing is fairly well understood to be the results of changes in the orbit of the Earth, though the mechanism behind the resulting response has not been conclusively established. These orbital cycles are regular and predictable and they are definately not the cause of today's warming. The other important difference between the glacial-interglacial cycles and today is the rapidity of the current change. The rate of warming is on the order of 10 times faster today than seen in the ice cores.

Such rapid warming on a global scale is very rare in the geological record, and while it may not be unprecedented, there is very strong evidence that whenever such a change has happened, whatever the cause, it was a catastrophic event for the biosphere.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 07 2006 at 9:30pm
I keep hearing a lot of denial statements based on some junk science, that for the most part has already been dismissed or debunked.
 
It reminds me somewhat of a friend who had a sever drug addiction for years. Denial being his main fault in getting over his addiction. And as much as I would talk to him and others he would always seem to find a way to explain it off to the next high. Thankfully after professional counceling and family intervention he started coming around and eventually beat his addiction.
 
Insert Oil for drugs
Insert USA for friend
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Scotty View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: March 06 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 846
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Scotty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 4:05am
Speculation on global warming is as interesting as speculation on pandemic flu but in both cases there are practical issues that really do effect us now.

Expect the cost of fossil fuel to be forced ever higher due to increased taxation. Expect environmental taxes on virtually everything. Try to arrange your lives in a way that gives you an edge.

In colder climates with hard winters insulation is a sure bet. If you live a long distance from your place of work then move your job or move your home. If you depend on air travel then be prepared for some serious cost increases. This show is coming to a cinema near you and its coming soon. Not your grand children but you. Stay ahead of the game and reap the rewards. Leave the scientific speculation to the dreamers and keep your eye on the ball. Read my lips. More new taxes.
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 7:44am
Oil and gas
 
What happens when demands starts out pacing supply. I dont think taxation will be the major factor in oil pricing. It will be nations like Emerging China, India, and many other smaller countries with emerging fossil fuel economies. At some point in the not to near future oil production will not be able to keep up with the fast growing demand.
 
Per person usage    1 barrel oil =42 gallons of gas
 
USA 25 barrels Oil per Year per person 1050 gallons of gas
England  12 barrels of oil a year or 504 gallons of gas
China 2 barrels of oil per person or 84 gallons of gas
 
Do you see the disparety. Now imaginge china who has been in the process of building highways and roads and creating there own middle class who will  be purchasing auto's and using more energy. The oil supply will not be able to keep up even with the most favorable projections unless some huge new find is located shortly. And that has not happened, as a matter of fact in the last 5 years exploration has been steadily getting worse and worse.
 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Heidi View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Heidi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 7:55am
Actually, there was a big find this week in the Gulf of Mexico.  Other than that, you are right on, Mahshadin. Keep it up!
Life is Good!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 9:45am
Originally posted by KevO KevO wrote:

In a UK survey this week, people said they wouldn't give up there cars for public transport or bikes however expensive petrol got.
Reality check. That's where we are at.

I gave up my car about four years ago. I was living in London. No need for acar. I moved out of London but have not replaced my car and have no intention to do so. The idea that a car is required by all adults in the Uk is a fallacy. I manage without. I do hire a car every 6 weeks or so for some vital trips, heavy shopping etc. but as to daily operation I do need a car ever again. I'm doing my bit!

HD
    
Back to Top
MelodyAtHome View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: May 16 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2018
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MelodyAtHome Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 9:55am

We too gave up our pick up truck. Mainly because the payments were over $500 a month, sucking up gas, insurance sky high, wear and tear plus up keep....we have been putting that money towards paying our home off...we have a long way to go but it's a start.

We homeschool and I work from home so if we need to go anywhere we wait for hubby to get home...or since my dad died about 2 years ago, mom doesn't drive...so her little station wagon sits in the garage. She lives next door so once a week I take her shopping in that and I try to get my stuff done at the same time.
I don't miss a 2nd vehicle at all. We live in the country, hubby works 35 miles away so we do need at least one vehicle:O)

Melody
Emergency Preparedness 911
http://emergencypreparedness911.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
jofg View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: May 31 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 79
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jofg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 11:55am
Originally posted by harpmandoodle harpmandoodle wrote:

Little known (or publicised) fact

For 6 out of the last 7 years the world could not produce enough food to feed the whole planet. It has relied on grain, etc. stores to make up the shortfalls. Those will eventually run out.

HD
 
Is this true?  I have heard that the world produces more than enough food for the population - it's just that there is a huge discrepnancy between the prodcution from the "rich" nations vs the "poor" nations and that the distribution of food is so overcome with ineptness and greed that those that most need the excess food don't get it.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 11:57am
Originally posted by DISPENSER 4 HIR DISPENSER 4 HIR wrote:

I may be wrong, but I seen to remember hearing something about there being ice-ages, then warming, then ice-ages, then warming in the history of Earth?
I have also heard the sun goes through cycles where it is hotter, then cooler.

The orbit of the Earth around the sun is not a constant circle, but slowly changes from a circle to an eliptical orbit.

I tend to doubt predictions of climate change when predictions of next months weather seems to be so difficult.

I also think the body heat from 6 billion people has as much effect on the global temperature as driving cars.

You are certainly free to dissagree with me, just as I am free to dissagree with you.


some people simply don't get in. But if the light doesn't ever come on, then at least we've saved some NRG

.
    
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 12:41pm
Heidi,
 
If you look at the projections for that incredibly difficult to extract oil field you will find it definetly will not be online for years and will cost billions to get it online making the oil very expensive.
 
On top of that with current projections on the conservative side new production of 1.1 million barrels a day production facility will have to be brought online every year starting in 2010 just to keep up demand.
 
How much oil are they ralisticly going to be-able to extract from a well 28,175 feet deep.
 
In there own test they estimated 6000 barrels a day (Drop in the Bucket)
There will have to be huge investments (Billions) just to get facilities capable of 1million barrels a Day. And all of this is going where? Oh smack dab in the middle of Hurricane central (Jeees)
 
 
 
 
 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 7:07pm
Political talking points are not hard science.  I guess for those of us still alive in 10 years we can see if the Earth is burning up, cooling down, or neither.
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2006 at 10:07pm
Political talking points (Thats Laughable)
 
The only political talking points on this subject recently is denial      you know head in the sand syndrom     HSS     
 
I think your afflicted
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 1:11am
jofg

It was a sweeping statement I agree, so I went and tried to find where I read it.

I did find this one:

World cereal demand to outstrip supply
Global food import bill forecast to increase by over 2 percent in 2006

FAONEWSRELEASE 06/65 e

Rome, 8 June 2006 -- World cereal demand is forecast to surpass supply in the coming 2006/07 marketing year, pushing down stocks to an uncomfortably low level and continuing the steady upward trend in prices, according to the June issue of FAO’s Food Outlook report.

“Amid political uncertainties and surging energy prices, agricultural markets over the past year have also had to confront abnormal incidences of natural disasters, ranging from devastating hurricanes to fast spreading animal diseases,” the report said.

“Based on current indications, several agricultural commodities are likely to experience still more unstable months ahead and, in most instances, the fundamentals point to even further gains in prices,” according to the report.

Food import bill growing, especially for poorest countries

FAO is forecasting an increase of over 2 percent in the world food import bill in 2006 compared to 2005. The increase is expected to be strongest for cereals and sugar and smallest for meat. Given their higher share as importers of food and feed, the developing countries’ bill is forecast to grow by 3.5 percent, while that of low-income food-deficit countries is forecast to jump by nearly 7 percent.

Wheat
According to the report, a 10 million tonne decrease in world wheat production is forecast this year, with a strong demand outlook set to drive up world trade in 2006/07 to 110 million tonnes. The world balance sheet for 2006/07 is expected to show a sharp drop in ending stocks as well as a decline in the stocks-to-use ratio to 25 percent, the lowest in over three decades.

Against this background and even barring any major or unexpected weather problems in the coming months, wheat prices are likely to remain generally high and volatile in the new season, FAO said.

Coarse grains
International prices have started to strengthen in recent months, supported by a robust demand from the ethanol sector, a potential recovery in feed use and tighter export supplies. World coarse grain production in 2006 is forecast to decline by 13 million tonnes, but trade is tentatively forecast to remain unchanged in 2006/07, at around 105 million tonnes. On current production indications, the new season’s supply and demand balance will be tight, with a sharp anticipated fall in world stocks and a near-record low stocks-to-use ratio of around 15 percent.

Sugar
World sugar prices reached their highest level in 25 years in February 2006, when raw sugar prices exceeded US¢19 per pound. The major factors underpinning these price levels were unprecedented rises in crude oil prices, as well as the continued supply deficit in the world sugar market for the third consecutive year.

In 2005/06, world sugar production is set to grow by 3 percent to 149.7 million tonnes, with consumption rising by 2 percent to 149.9 million tonnes. Developing countries are expected to account for most of the increases, particularly those with strong economic performances, such as China and India. Consumption in developed countries is expected to remain stagnant, due to low population growth and dietary concerns. For the remainder of 2005/06, world sugar prices are expected to remain firm at current levels, the report said.

Meat and meat products
After a brief recovery in 2005, global meat markets have again been unsettled by animal disease concerns in 2006. Consumer responses to the increasing incidence of avian influenza, together with disease-related bans on North American beef and South American red meat exports, are largely shaping meat markets in 2006.

Expectations of the lowest meat consumption gains in 25 years, uncertain price prospects and escalating trade restrictions in 2006 are expected to limit global meat output to 272 million tonnes. Meanwhile, trade is expected to reach 20.5 million tonnes, up only marginally, in response to sluggish global poultry import demand from major markets and the imposition of animal disease-related trade bans.

The June issue of Food Outlook introduces a new format. The new Food Outlook will be published twice a year and will focus on developments affecting global markets for food and feed commodities.

Contact:
Information Officer, FAO
teresamarie.buerkle@fao.org
(+39) 06 570 56146
(+39) 348 141 6671

liknk to article
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 8:59am
The worlds food supply is now wholely dependent on fossil fuels at least in the west. I the last 4 decades our farmlands have been transformed from family owned human labor enterprizes to corporate fossil fuel mechanized entities. Our food suplly is now entirely linked to fossil fuel availability.
 
What happens when demand outpaces production. In even the most favorable projections of Fossil fuel availability in coming years verses rising demand from the west and newly emerging asian markets the inevitable day will come where production can not keep up with demand. For us in the west where are entire society has been coverted or more relient on fossil fuels this is a huge pending problem that can not simply be wished away. Our children and grand children will be faced with these enourmous problems unless we all stop dreaming of a fantasy world of endless oil.
 
This not hard to figure out just use basic math (Exponential Growth) to calculate crude usage against consistant usage growth and you will quickly see that current growth can not possibly be sustained on an entirely fossil fuel basis alone. We need to start making huge investments in tomarrows economy which will have to be powered by less and less fossil fuels.
 
This is a reality not a myth and we in the west need to stop fantasizng and feeding into the present beliefs of endless fossil fuels, are our children and grandchildrens futures are relient on our actions now.
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 9:32am
Originally posted by Scotty Scotty wrote:

Fenwulfr: No one has yet proved that pumping millions of tons of poison, polution and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is beneficial.

 
I can't believe I am defending the Non-global warming folks:
 
The pumping of all that poison has produced modern drugs, modern healthcare, and modern conveniences. Don't forget, with out all that poison in the air. we would still be back in the late 1890's with no indoor plumbing, modern hospital technology, no modern transportation, etc. I'm really not advocating dumping poison in, on, and around the erath, I'm just saying there are benifits to the madness.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 9:36am
Originally posted by Mahshadin Mahshadin wrote:

Heidi,
  
In there own test they estimated 6000 barrels a day (Drop in the Bucket)
There will have to be huge investments (Billions) just to get facilities capable of 1million barrels a Day. And all of this is going where?
 
 
 
Considering each and every major oil company has reported tens of billions in profits each QTR, I see no obstacle for them to spend a small percentage of their profits on developing new sources.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 11:33am

deleted

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 11:35am
Please explain the method of determining temparature accuracy with 0.1 degree C in 1860.  I don't think think this accuracy was possible then.
 
 
 
Originally posted by KevO KevO wrote:

Originally posted by DISPENSER 4 HIR DISPENSER 4 HIR wrote:

The climate, like the weather and stocks...fluctuates.


Sadly untrue. Americans are the only citizens, in any number, on planet eart who still think this. No doubt something to do with the Bush admin being Oil men - which they are.
anyway check this non fluctauting graph showing stats from 1860 to present day - in other words from the start of the Industrial revolution aka the Death Knell

    
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 3:24pm
As you can see the accuracy in 1860 does not really have that much to do with the major problem which really started showing effects in the late 1980's to now.  If you are so concerned about 1860 just add in a .1 or even a .2 varience, of course you would be assuming the inaccuracy would only be in one direction which of course would not be correct. Even with that done does not change what is definetly happening.
 
The major problem is whats been happening in the last 25 years which directly coorolates to the increases of GHG's mainly C02 into the atmospher. 
 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 3:44pm
l
Graph showing rise of CO2, from measurements in ice cores (Siple, Antarctica) and measurements from Mauna Loa, Hawaii (Keeling curve) since James Watt, inventor of the steam engine. (Pre-1990 data in: B. Moore & D. Schimel, 1992. Trace Gases and the Biosphere. UCAR, Boulder CO)
l
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 6:40pm

I just love baiting true believers, who are so enraptured by their doctrine, that any challenge or deviation is met with cries of heresy. LOL  I can see you all wisely nodding your heads and agreeing the poor man is disturbed and must be helped in spite himself.  I swear you are two steps away from crying "Witch! Burn him!"

Back to Top
Hotair View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: March 17 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 667
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hotair Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 09 2006 at 7:13pm
Mach, I for I could do without all the conveniences(well maybe not all.I do like my latte now and then.) But then, I always felt that I was born in the wrong century. I am so ready to start canning more and would welcome a horse and buggy. I would certainly miss a washing machine and all the benefits of modern medicine, but people here commute 2 hours in the morning to work and again in the evening. I wonder what would happen if there were one giant pulse so everything went out. No cars to drive or cell phones... I know there are things I would miss terribly but I think most of us on this website are of a pioneering nature--otherwise we wouldn't be here. We are struggling to find a new path and are leaders in a way. And besides, it would give me a great excuse to get another horse!   
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2006 at 12:06am

So what is it about this subject that bothers you so much that you would resort to personal insults, and attempts to discredit what you do not understand.

 As an advisor if all you have to add is Herecy, Witch, and disturbed maybe you should consider resigning and becoming a conservative conformist

 

 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2006 at 9:02pm
I do not have to become conservative, I already am. I am also proud or it.
If you cannot even entertain the thought that you might be wrong, go join the communist party. They were never wrong either.
edited to add:
Yes I think I do hear cries of "Witch! Burn him!"
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 10 2006 at 9:48pm

Ya I got that

Funny how cons always think everyone else needs to change or they are Commy's.
 
How original but it does fit the label Conservative Conformist.
 
Oh Im sorry the label thing is a con thing oh-well
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 1:36am
Originally posted by DISPENSER 4 HIR DISPENSER 4 HIR wrote:

I do not have to become conservative, I already am. I am also proud or it.
If you cannot even entertain the thought that you might be wrong, go join the communist party.


Why do so many Americans think being communist is some sort of insult?
As if, capitalism worked!!

I'm not a 'commie' nor am I, GOD forbid, the Devil's own -a conservative. Nor do I believe in Islam nor Christianity as both are the Gods of War.
But generally, community (communism) is a better ideal than f*** you Jack, I'm alright (capitalism). Both un-attainable utopias of course. But hey look at the west, capitalism failed.

Conservatism is for the 'authoritarian' personality. Extreme Conservatism is Nazism, so therefore anything that is 'green' would mean that Tory having to lose some authority or control. They will simply not allowed to buy an SUV, their choices will be limited (in this case for the sake of the planet and OUR grandkids, if not just our kids!!) - so they instead 'choose' NOT to believe things such as global warming. Extreme Tories, go further and try and debunk such things.
That's how it works over there and over here
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 4:45am

interesting things you should know about global population and its impactsOuch


Solar power is now the
world’s fastest growing
energy source.
The following statistics are taken from the Worldwatch Institute’s Vital Signs 2006-2007, which was released in July 2006.

1. The world’s population topped 6.4 billion in 2005 (double the figure in 1950) In 2005, world population grew by some 74 million people.

2. These people’s oil use increased by 1.3 percent to 3.8 billion tons or 83.3 million barrels a day.

3. Coal use rose 6.3 percent to 2.8 billion tons of oil equivalent, while natural gas use rose 3.3 percent to 2.4 billion tons of oil equivalent.

4. There were 45.6 million passenger cars built (up 3.2 percent), an extra 18.5 million light trucks constructed (up 2.8 percent), and another 101 million bicycles were made (up nine percent).

5. The world now has more than 603 million cars, and 220 million light trucks, on its roads.

6. Production of fuel ethanol, the world’s leading biofuel, increased 19 percent in 2005 to 36.5 billion litres. Ethanol, produced mainly from sugarcane and corn, accounts for more than 90 percent of the world’s total biofuel production. Biodiesel, derived from plant oils, is the main other type of biofuel; its output shot up 60 percent in 2005. Overall, biofuels now account for about 1 percent of the global liquid fuels market.

7. Solar power is now the world’s fastest growing energy source, with photovoltaic cell production up 45 percent to 1700 megawatts during 2005.

8. There are now 125 million square metres of solar heating installed.

9. Wind power capacity increased 24 percent to 59,600 megawatts last year. In the US, there are now enough wind turbines to meet the needs of 2.3 million households.

10. The average temperature in 2005 was 14.6 degrees Celsius, which it said is the warmest year ever recorded on the Earth’s surface.

11. Five of the warmest years on record have occurred since 1998.

12. Carbon dioxide concentration reached 379.6 parts per million, an increase of 0.6 percent over the record amount in 2004. The 2005 increase is the largest ever recorded.

13. Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel burning increased 4.5 percent to a record 7.6 billion tons.    HI , the following Statistics are taken from the Worldwatch Institute's Vital Signs 2006 -2007, which were released in July 2006. source http://www.econews.org.au

Back to Top
Scotty View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: March 06 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 846
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Scotty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 5:41am
Can we just come back down to earth for a moment. The U.S. uses almost twice as much energy as other G8 countries. These countries all have indoor plumbing and they do not live an 1890's lifestyle.

With reference to global warming, there may come a time when an 1890's lifestyle starts to look quite appealing.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 6:05am
Originally posted by Scotty Scotty wrote:

there may come a time when an 1890's lifestyle starts to look quite appealing.


In the UK that means tall hats and itchy clothes and corsets?
Not sure about that
In the US it must mean cowboys and Indians
     
Back to Top
Scotty View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: March 06 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 846
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Scotty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 6:34am
Corsets? Well I suppose I would just have to do my bit for the planet and find a lady with a waistline. Its a tough job but somebody's got to do it!

Back to Top
mamasjob View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: May 16 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mamasjob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 10:31am
Dear Mahshadin~  Thank you for posting this info.  I am learning a great deal.  I have never really had time to understand most of the more complex aspects of global warming.  Some of the more technical issues are still over my head...but, I feel like I have a clearer picture.  Please continue this thread.  Sincerely, JD
Back to Top
Scotty View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: March 06 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 846
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Scotty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 11:05am
600 million cars? That's a lot of cars. That's a car for every ten people. At this rate of expansion the time may come when almost every family has a car. No wonder the planet is choking itself to death. I blame the Germans of course.

Carl and Gotlieb.
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 4:21pm
Your welcome   JD
 
Credit goes to KevO for starting this important discussion.
 
We all need to take the time to educate ourselves on whats happening rather than just accept what a few with an agenda are feeding us all.
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 4:39pm

Great info Candles.

Brings to light some of the staggering numbers involved. Which for many is part of the problem, hearing things like Chevron announces a new oil discovery which could be between 3 and 15 Billion barrels. Thats 15,000,000,000 Barrels thats 630,000,000,000 Billion gallons of gas.  For most of us that seems enourmous but in reality its a drop in the bucket and just months of supply not years.  Thats the rediculous truth of the problems we are creating for ourselves and our children & Grandchildren.

When you take a moment to understand current and projected concumtion it puts things in perspective. The World community consumes 80,000,000 Million Barrels of oil a day (2003), if converted to gas thats 3,360,000,000 Billion gallons of gas a day. Now obvioously its not all turned into gas but it gives a pretty good perspective on the crazy numbers involved per day.
 
How much CO2 do you think that is?????
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 7:55pm
Originally posted by KevO KevO wrote:

[QUOTE=DISPENSER 4 HIR]  But hey look at the west, capitalism failed.
 

Failed on what planet? Capitalism is alive and well, giving the citizens of the US the best standard of living in the world. You do realize our poor people own cars and have colored TV's cell phones etc?

 

Where can you point to where communism or socialism has succeeded in doing anything but creating misery? (Except for the ruling class of course) France, which is slowly sinking under the weight of high taxes and people who will not work?  Cuba, the workers paradise? China?  Where?

 

Also, if you read what I actually posted, not what you wished to see.  You will find that I disagreed that Global Warming caused by man is an excepted scientific fact.  I then posted links showing that there are scientists who disagree. I also said I did not believe that man caused global warming, but twice posted that anyone was free to disagree with me. I called nobody names, and in fact never said man did not cause global warming, I just said I did not believe it. I then went further and made fun of the True Believers in Global Warming that takes it as a tenet of their religion and can tolerate no deviation from their dogma.

This entire thread is proof I was right about that. The scientist I linked to were marginalized along with myself. I was encouraged to quit posting. It was said I am in denial etc.  In an open society the exchange of ideas encourages that those ideas be different.  If they are the same what is the point in exchanging them?  The way so many people take a disagreement of an idea so personally is ludicrous. Freedom of speech does not only apply to thoughts you agree with.  If your beliefs cannot stand up to a different viewpoint, perhaps your beliefs are not so firmly etched in stone after all?  The truth about global warming will have to wait for the future. The proof of the intolerance of other viewpoints is here for all to see.
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 11 2006 at 8:40pm
August 31, 2006

California Enacts Nation’s Toughest Global Warming Bill
Scientists and Economists Laid Groundwork for Legislation

BERKELEY, CA, August 31—The California Legislature today passed landmark legislation to create the nation's first economy-wide cap on global warming emissions, and Governor Schwarzenegger has agreed to sign the bill into law. The mounting scientific evidence gathered and produced by California's scientific community helped build the political will that led to this historic day.

"This bill marks a national turning point in the fight against global warming," said Jason Mark, California Director of the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). "It sends a strong signal to the international community that Americans are committed to climate action despite Washington's intransigence."

Our Changing Climate, a scientific analysis developed by the state's California Climate Change Center in collaboration with UCS, demonstrated that if heat-trapping emissions are not reduced, California faces a future of poorer air quality, a sharp rise in extreme heat, a less reliable water supply, more large wildfires, and expanding risks to agriculture.

"California has a lot to lose from continued global warming but a lot to gain from taking action to lower emissions," said Dr. Amy Lynd Luers, UCS Climate Impacts Scientist and co-author of the new state report. "The mounting scientific evidence is the writing on the wall, and California policymakers have gotten the message."

Climate action can not only protect California from the most severe impacts of global warming, it can also boost the economy. A recent study by the University of California at Berkeley projects that meeting AB 32's emissions limits can boost the Gross State Product (GSP) by $60-74 billion and create 17,000-89,000 new jobs. Separately, UCS helped organize an open letter by 60 Ph.D. economists from across California, including 3 Nobel Laureates, urging them to accelerate climate action. The letter calls emissions caps a "particularly potent strategy" and warns that "the most expensive things we can do is nothing."

As the world's twelfth largest source of carbon dioxide, the chief global warming gas, California has a responsibility to act. And as the sixth largest global economy, California's efforts will reverberate around the globe as the state uses existing and new technologies to reduce emissions.

"With this groundbreaking legislation, California politicians have come together to lead the nation in taking action on global warming," said Dan Kalb, California Policy Coordinator for UCS. "This bill is a valuable template for other states and the federal government."

Our Changing Climate: Assessing the Risks to California, the UC Berkeley study, the economists' letter, and a summary of the legislation can all be viewed at http://www.climatechoices.org

 
 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Scotty View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: March 06 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 846
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Scotty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2006 at 12:47am
The Siberian permafrost is now melting. The trapped methane is now bubbling out of the mud. Current estimates suggest that this will more than double the existing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

Whilst many of us choose to debate its existence, global warming has already become self-sustaining.
Back to Top
Heidi View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 23
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Heidi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2006 at 7:59am
Hey Dispenser4hir: Have you ever heard of the "Precautionary Principle?"
 

The precautionary principle states that if the potential consequences of an action are severe or irreversible, in the absence of full scientific certainty the burden of proof falls on those who would advocate taking the action.

The precautionary principle is most often applied in the context of the impact of human development or new technology on the environment and human health, as both involve complex systems where the consequences of actions may be unpredictable.

The formal concept evolved out of the German socio-legal tradition in the 1930s, centering on the concept of good household management. [1] In German the concept is vorsorgeprinzip, which translates into English as precaution principle. The concept includes risk prevention, cost effectiveness, ethical responsibilities towards maintaining the integrity of natural systems, and the fallibility of human understanding. It can also be interpreted as the transfer of more generally applied precaution in daily life (e.g. buying insurance, using seat belts or consulting experts before decisions) to larger political arenas.

Some environmental commentators take a more stringent interpretation of the precautionary principle, stating that proponents of a potentially harmful technology must show the new technology is harmless before the new technology is used.(Montague, 1998)

GET IT?
Life is Good!
Back to Top
Mahshadin View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: January 26 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3882
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahshadin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2006 at 8:05am
Global Warming 101
Human Fingerprints
 
Earth's surface has undergone unprecedented warming over the last century, particularly over the last two decades. Astonishingly, every single year since 1992 is in the current list of the 20 warmest years on record.[1,2] The natural patterns of climate have been altered. Like detectives, science sleuths seek the answer to "Whodunnit?" — are humans part of the cause? To answer this question, patterns observed by meteorologists and oceanographers are compared with patterns developed using sophisticated models of Earth's atmosphere and ocean. By matching the observed and modeled patterns, scientists can now positively identify the "human fingerprints" associated with the changes. The fingerprints that humans have left on Earth's climate are turning up in a diverse range of records and can be seen in the ocean, in the atmosphere, and at the surface.

In its 2001 report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated, "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities." [3] Carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning and land clearing has been accumulating in the atmosphere, where it acts like a blanket keeping Earth warm and heating up the surface, ocean, and atmosphere. As a result, current levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years. [4,5,6]

Background: Driving the Climate ("Forcing")

Climate is influenced by many factors, both natural and human. [7] Things that increase temperature, such as increases in heat-trapping emissions from cars and power plants or an increase in the amount of radiation the sun emits, are examples of "positive" forcings or drivers. Volcanic events and some types of human-made pollution, both of which inject sunlight-reflecting aerosols into the atmosphere, lower temperature and are examples of "negative" forcings or drivers. Natural climate drivers include the sun's energy output, aerosols from volcanic activity, and changes in snow and ice cover. Human climate drivers include heat-trapping emissions from cars and power plants, aerosols from pollution, and soot particles.

Much as the Air Force develops computer programs to simulate aircraft flight under different conditions, climate scientists develop computer programs to simulate global climate changes under different conditions. These programs use our knowledge of physical, chemical, and biological processes that occur within Earth's atmosphere and oceans and on its land surfaces. Mathematical models allow scientists to simulate the behavior of complex systems such as climate and explore how these systems respond to natural and human factors.

Fingerprint 1: The Ocean Layers Warm

The world's oceans have absorbed about 20 times as much heat as the atmosphere over the past half-century, leading to higher temperatures not only in surface waters but also in water 1,500 feet below the surface. [8,9] The measured increases in water temperature lie well outside the bounds of natural climate variation. 

Fingerprint 2: The Atmosphere Shifts

Recent research shows that human activities have lifted the boundary of Earth's lower atmosphere. Known as the troposphere (from the Greek tropos, which means "turning"), this lowest layer of the atmosphere contains Earth's weather. The stable layer above is called the stratosphere. The boundary that separates the two layers, the tropopause, is as high as nine miles above the equator and as low as five miles above the poles. In an astounding development, a 2003 study showed that this tropopause has shifted upward over the last two decades by more than 900 feet. [10] The rising tropopause marks another human fingerprint on Earth's climate.

In their search for clues, scientists compared two natural drivers of climate (solar changes and volcanic aerosols) and three human drivers of climate (heat-trapping emissions, aerosol pollution, and ozone depletion), altering these one at a time in their sophisticated models. Changes in the sun during the twentieth century have warmed both the troposphere and stratosphere. But human activities have increased heat-trapping emissions and decreased stratospheric ozone. This has led to the troposphere warming more because the increase in heat-trapping emissions is trapping more of Earth's outgoing heat. The stratosphere has cooled more because there is less ozone to absorb incoming sunlight to heat up the stratosphere. Both these effects combine to shift the boundary upward. Over the period 1979-1999, a study shows that human-induced changes in heat-trapping emissions and ozone account for more than 80 percent of the rise in tropopause height. [10] This is yet another example of how science detectives are quantifying the impact of human activities on climate. 

Fingerprint 3: The Surface Heats Up

Measurements show that global average temperature has risen by 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit in the last 100 years, with most of that happening in the last three decades. [1,2] By comparing Earth's temperature over that last century with models comparing climate drivers, a study showed that, from 1950 to the present, most of the warming was caused by heat-trapping emissions from human activities [3]. In fact, heat-trapping emissions are driving the climate about three times more strongly now than they were in 1950. The spatial pattern of where this warming is occurring around the globe indicates human-induced causes. Even accounting for the occasional short-lived cooling from volcanic events and moderate levels of cooling from aerosol pollution as well as minor fluctuations in the sun's output in the last 30 years, heat-trapping emissions far outweigh any other current climate driver. Once again, our scientific fingerprinting identifies human activities as the main driver of our warming climate.

Full article can be read here
 
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."   G Orwell
Back to Top
Scotty View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: March 06 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 846
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Scotty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 12 2006 at 8:35am
Just a bit of clarification. It is perfectly possible for an event to occur 100% of the time, every time, forever, and yet fail to satisfy the requirements of "scientific proof". Hence Newton's experimental law.
    
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down