Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk |
OT: Global Warming |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | ||
Dlugose
Valued Member Joined: July 28 2006 Location: Colorado Status: Offline Points: 277 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
When you get your compact fluorecent lights, if they break, or when you dispose of them keep in mind that they have small amounts of mercury and should have special disposal. The room where they break should be well ventilated and children or pregnant women out of the way until after cleanup.
I have a hybrid and get 50 mpg year round, more in the summer.
|
||
Dlugose RN AAS BA BS Cert. Biotechnology. Respiratory nurse
June 2013: public health nurse volunteer, Asia |
||
crystal
Valued Member Joined: February 16 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Dlugose - thanks for the info on the bulbs. What type of hybrid do you have?
|
||
peace
|
||
Heidi
V.I.P. Member Joined: June 20 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Another result of climate change is that the Amazon is not receiving the rainfall that it normally gets (and needs) due to global wind patterns shifting and changing course. The Amazon is beginning to show drought distress. If the current trend continues we face the certainty that the rainforest will die. If it dries up and dies it will no longer be our earth's lungs. It will go from being a carbon dioxide sink to a major carbon dioxide emitter. I believe it was stated in the Tom Brokaw show that if we lose the Amazon we will lose an ice cap.
|
||
Life is Good!
|
||
Never2late
Valued Member Joined: April 30 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 247 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Today in the morning paper there was an article that said as tundra thaws it is releasing a bucket load of methane gas which is some X times factor worse that CO2 and the scientists are all worked up now because its going to real hot and then we'll all die. But then again, we are all going to die someday anyway so party on!!! Drink that beer while it can be chilled.
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I may be wrong, but I seen to remember hearing something about there being ice-ages, then warming, then ice-ages, then warming in the history of Earth?
I have also heard the sun goes through cycles where it is hotter, then cooler.
The orbit of the Earth around the sun is not a constant circle, but slowly changes from a circle to an eliptical orbit.
I tend to doubt predictions of climate change when predictions of next months weather seems to be so difficult.
I also think the body heat from 6 billion people has as much effect on the global temperature as driving cars.
You are certainly free to dissagree with me, just as I am free to dissagree with you.
|
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Climate has always changed, why are we worried now and why does it have to be humans fault? |
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I keep hearing a lot of denial statements based on some junk science, that for the most part has already been dismissed or debunked.
It reminds me somewhat of a friend who had a sever drug addiction for years. Denial being his main fault in getting over his addiction. And as much as I would talk to him and others he would always seem to find a way to explain it off to the next high. Thankfully after professional counceling and family intervention he started coming around and eventually beat his addiction.
Insert Oil for drugs
Insert USA for friend
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Scotty
Adviser Group Joined: March 06 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Speculation on global warming is as interesting as speculation on pandemic flu but in both cases there are practical issues that really do effect us now.
Expect the cost of fossil fuel to be forced ever higher due to increased taxation. Expect environmental taxes on virtually everything. Try to arrange your lives in a way that gives you an edge. In colder climates with hard winters insulation is a sure bet. If you live a long distance from your place of work then move your job or move your home. If you depend on air travel then be prepared for some serious cost increases. This show is coming to a cinema near you and its coming soon. Not your grand children but you. Stay ahead of the game and reap the rewards. Leave the scientific speculation to the dreamers and keep your eye on the ball. Read my lips. More new taxes. |
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Oil and gas
What happens when demands starts out pacing supply. I dont think taxation will be the major factor in oil pricing. It will be nations like Emerging China, India, and many other smaller countries with emerging fossil fuel economies. At some point in the not to near future oil production will not be able to keep up with the fast growing demand.
Per person usage 1 barrel oil =42 gallons of gas
USA 25 barrels Oil per Year per person 1050 gallons of gas
England 12 barrels of oil a year or 504 gallons of gas
China 2 barrels of oil per person or 84 gallons of gas
Do you see the disparety. Now imaginge china who has been in the process of building highways and roads and creating there own middle class who will be purchasing auto's and using more energy. The oil supply will not be able to keep up even with the most favorable projections unless some huge new find is located shortly. And that has not happened, as a matter of fact in the last 5 years exploration has been steadily getting worse and worse.
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Heidi
V.I.P. Member Joined: June 20 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Actually, there was a big find this week in the Gulf of Mexico. Other than that, you are right on, Mahshadin. Keep it up!
|
||
Life is Good!
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I gave up my car about four years ago. I was living in London. No need for acar. I moved out of London but have not replaced my car and have no intention to do so. The idea that a car is required by all adults in the Uk is a fallacy. I manage without. I do hire a car every 6 weeks or so for some vital trips, heavy shopping etc. but as to daily operation I do need a car ever again. I'm doing my bit! HD |
||
MelodyAtHome
Valued Member Joined: May 16 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2018 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
We too gave up our pick up truck. Mainly because the payments were over $500 a month, sucking up gas, insurance sky high, wear and tear plus up keep....we have been putting that money towards paying our home off...we have a long way to go but it's a start. We homeschool and I work from home so if we need to go anywhere we wait for hubby to get home...or since my dad died about 2 years ago, mom doesn't drive...so her little station wagon sits in the garage. She lives next door so once a week I take her shopping in that and I try to get my stuff done at the same time. |
||
Melody
Emergency Preparedness 911 http://emergencypreparedness911.blogspot.com/ |
||
jofg
Valued Member Joined: May 31 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 79 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Is this true? I have heard that the world produces more than enough food for the population - it's just that there is a huge discrepnancy between the prodcution from the "rich" nations vs the "poor" nations and that the distribution of food is so overcome with ineptness and greed that those that most need the excess food don't get it.
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
some people simply don't get in. But if the light doesn't ever come on, then at least we've saved some NRG . |
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Heidi,
If you look at the projections for that incredibly difficult to extract oil field you will find it definetly will not be online for years and will cost billions to get it online making the oil very expensive.
On top of that with current projections on the conservative side new production of 1.1 million barrels a day production facility will have to be brought online every year starting in 2010 just to keep up demand.
How much oil are they ralisticly going to be-able to extract from a well 28,175 feet deep.
In there own test they estimated 6000 barrels a day (Drop in the Bucket)
There will have to be huge investments (Billions) just to get facilities capable of 1million barrels a Day. And all of this is going where? Oh smack dab in the middle of Hurricane central (Jeees)
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Political talking points are not hard science. I guess for those of us still alive in 10 years we can see if the Earth is burning up, cooling down, or neither.
|
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Political talking points (Thats Laughable)
The only political talking points on this subject recently is denial you know head in the sand syndrom HSS
I think your afflicted
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
jofg
It was a sweeping statement I agree, so I went and tried to find where I read it. I did find this one: World cereal demand to outstrip supply Global food import bill forecast to increase by over 2 percent in 2006 FAONEWSRELEASE 06/65 e Rome, 8 June 2006 -- World cereal demand is forecast to surpass supply in the coming 2006/07 marketing year, pushing down stocks to an uncomfortably low level and continuing the steady upward trend in prices, according to the June issue of FAO’s Food Outlook report. “Amid political uncertainties and surging energy prices, agricultural markets over the past year have also had to confront abnormal incidences of natural disasters, ranging from devastating hurricanes to fast spreading animal diseases,” the report said. “Based on current indications, several agricultural commodities are likely to experience still more unstable months ahead and, in most instances, the fundamentals point to even further gains in prices,” according to the report. Food import bill growing, especially for poorest countries FAO is forecasting an increase of over 2 percent in the world food import bill in 2006 compared to 2005. The increase is expected to be strongest for cereals and sugar and smallest for meat. Given their higher share as importers of food and feed, the developing countries’ bill is forecast to grow by 3.5 percent, while that of low-income food-deficit countries is forecast to jump by nearly 7 percent. Wheat According to the report, a 10 million tonne decrease in world wheat production is forecast this year, with a strong demand outlook set to drive up world trade in 2006/07 to 110 million tonnes. The world balance sheet for 2006/07 is expected to show a sharp drop in ending stocks as well as a decline in the stocks-to-use ratio to 25 percent, the lowest in over three decades. Against this background and even barring any major or unexpected weather problems in the coming months, wheat prices are likely to remain generally high and volatile in the new season, FAO said. Coarse grains International prices have started to strengthen in recent months, supported by a robust demand from the ethanol sector, a potential recovery in feed use and tighter export supplies. World coarse grain production in 2006 is forecast to decline by 13 million tonnes, but trade is tentatively forecast to remain unchanged in 2006/07, at around 105 million tonnes. On current production indications, the new season’s supply and demand balance will be tight, with a sharp anticipated fall in world stocks and a near-record low stocks-to-use ratio of around 15 percent. Sugar World sugar prices reached their highest level in 25 years in February 2006, when raw sugar prices exceeded US¢19 per pound. The major factors underpinning these price levels were unprecedented rises in crude oil prices, as well as the continued supply deficit in the world sugar market for the third consecutive year. In 2005/06, world sugar production is set to grow by 3 percent to 149.7 million tonnes, with consumption rising by 2 percent to 149.9 million tonnes. Developing countries are expected to account for most of the increases, particularly those with strong economic performances, such as China and India. Consumption in developed countries is expected to remain stagnant, due to low population growth and dietary concerns. For the remainder of 2005/06, world sugar prices are expected to remain firm at current levels, the report said. Meat and meat products After a brief recovery in 2005, global meat markets have again been unsettled by animal disease concerns in 2006. Consumer responses to the increasing incidence of avian influenza, together with disease-related bans on North American beef and South American red meat exports, are largely shaping meat markets in 2006. Expectations of the lowest meat consumption gains in 25 years, uncertain price prospects and escalating trade restrictions in 2006 are expected to limit global meat output to 272 million tonnes. Meanwhile, trade is expected to reach 20.5 million tonnes, up only marginally, in response to sluggish global poultry import demand from major markets and the imposition of animal disease-related trade bans. The June issue of Food Outlook introduces a new format. The new Food Outlook will be published twice a year and will focus on developments affecting global markets for food and feed commodities. Contact: Information Officer, FAO teresamarie.buerkle@fao.org (+39) 06 570 56146 (+39) 348 141 6671 liknk to article |
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The worlds food supply is now wholely dependent on fossil fuels at least in the west. I the last 4 decades our farmlands have been transformed from family owned human labor enterprizes to corporate fossil fuel mechanized entities. Our food suplly is now entirely linked to fossil fuel availability.
What happens when demand outpaces production. In even the most favorable projections of Fossil fuel availability in coming years verses rising demand from the west and newly emerging asian markets the inevitable day will come where production can not keep up with demand. For us in the west where are entire society has been coverted or more relient on fossil fuels this is a huge pending problem that can not simply be wished away. Our children and grand children will be faced with these enourmous problems unless we all stop dreaming of a fantasy world of endless oil.
This not hard to figure out just use basic math (Exponential Growth) to calculate crude usage against consistant usage growth and you will quickly see that current growth can not possibly be sustained on an entirely fossil fuel basis alone. We need to start making huge investments in tomarrows economy which will have to be powered by less and less fossil fuels.
This is a reality not a myth and we in the west need to stop fantasizng and feeding into the present beliefs of endless fossil fuels, are our children and grandchildrens futures are relient on our actions now.
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I can't believe I am defending the Non-global warming folks:
The pumping of all that poison has produced modern drugs, modern healthcare, and modern conveniences. Don't forget, with out all that poison in the air. we would still be back in the late 1890's with no indoor plumbing, modern hospital technology, no modern transportation, etc. I'm really not advocating dumping poison in, on, and around the erath, I'm just saying there are benifits to the madness.
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Considering each and every major oil company has reported tens of billions in profits each QTR, I see no obstacle for them to spend a small percentage of their profits on developing new sources.
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
deleted |
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Please explain the method of determining temparature accuracy with 0.1 degree C in 1860. I don't think think this accuracy was possible then.
|
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
As you can see the accuracy in 1860 does not really have that much to do with the major problem which really started showing effects in the late 1980's to now. If you are so concerned about 1860 just add in a .1 or even a .2 varience, of course you would be assuming the inaccuracy would only be in one direction which of course would not be correct. Even with that done does not change what is definetly happening.
The major problem is whats been happening in the last 25 years which directly coorolates to the increases of GHG's mainly C02 into the atmospher.
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
l
Graph showing rise of CO2, from measurements in ice cores (Siple, Antarctica) and measurements from Mauna Loa, Hawaii (Keeling curve) since James Watt, inventor of the steam engine. (Pre-1990 data in: B. Moore & D. Schimel, 1992. Trace Gases and the Biosphere. UCAR, Boulder CO)
l
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I just love baiting true believers, who are so enraptured by their doctrine, that any challenge or deviation is met with cries of heresy. LOL I can see you all wisely nodding your heads and agreeing the poor man is disturbed and must be helped in spite himself. I swear you are two steps away from crying "Witch! Burn him!" |
||
Hotair
Valued Member Joined: March 17 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 667 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Mach, I for I could do without all the conveniences(well maybe not all.I do like my latte now and then.) But then, I always felt that I was born in the wrong century. I am so ready to start canning more and would welcome a horse and buggy. I would certainly miss a washing machine and all the benefits of modern medicine, but people here commute 2 hours in the morning to work and again in the evening. I wonder what would happen if there were one giant pulse so everything went out. No cars to drive or cell phones... I know there are things I would miss terribly but I think most of us on this website are of a pioneering nature--otherwise we wouldn't be here. We are struggling to find a new path and are leaders in a way. And besides, it would give me a great excuse to get another horse!
|
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So what is it about this subject that bothers you so much that you would resort to personal insults, and attempts to discredit what you do not understand. As an advisor if all you have to add is Herecy, Witch, and disturbed maybe you should consider resigning and becoming a conservative conformist
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I do not have to become conservative, I already am. I am also proud or it.
If you cannot even entertain the thought that you might be wrong, go join the communist party. They were never wrong either.
edited to add:
Yes I think I do hear cries of "Witch! Burn him!"
|
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Ya I got that Funny how cons always think everyone else needs to change or they are Commy's.
How original but it does fit the label Conservative Conformist.
Oh Im sorry the label thing is a con thing oh-well
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Why do so many Americans think being communist is some sort of insult? As if, capitalism worked!! I'm not a 'commie' nor am I, GOD forbid, the Devil's own -a conservative. Nor do I believe in Islam nor Christianity as both are the Gods of War. But generally, community (communism) is a better ideal than f*** you Jack, I'm alright (capitalism). Both un-attainable utopias of course. But hey look at the west, capitalism failed. Conservatism is for the 'authoritarian' personality. Extreme Conservatism is Nazism, so therefore anything that is 'green' would mean that Tory having to lose some authority or control. They will simply not allowed to buy an SUV, their choices will be limited (in this case for the sake of the planet and OUR grandkids, if not just our kids!!) - so they instead 'choose' NOT to believe things such as global warming. Extreme Tories, go further and try and debunk such things. That's how it works over there and over here |
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
Scotty
Adviser Group Joined: March 06 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Can we just come back down to earth for a moment. The U.S. uses almost twice as much energy as other G8 countries. These countries all have indoor plumbing and they do not live an 1890's lifestyle.
With reference to global warming, there may come a time when an 1890's lifestyle starts to look quite appealing. |
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
In the UK that means tall hats and itchy clothes and corsets? Not sure about that In the US it must mean cowboys and Indians |
||
Scotty
Adviser Group Joined: March 06 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Corsets? Well I suppose I would just have to do my bit for the planet and find a lady with a waistline. Its a tough job but somebody's got to do it!
|
||
mamasjob
Valued Member Joined: May 16 2006 Status: Offline Points: 192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Dear Mahshadin~ Thank you for posting this info. I am learning a great deal. I have never really had time to understand most of the more complex aspects of global warming. Some of the more technical issues are still over my head...but, I feel like I have a clearer picture. Please continue this thread. Sincerely, JD
|
||
Scotty
Adviser Group Joined: March 06 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
600 million cars? That's a lot of cars. That's a car for every ten people. At this rate of expansion the time may come when almost every family has a car. No wonder the planet is choking itself to death. I blame the Germans of course.
Carl and Gotlieb. |
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Your welcome JD
Credit goes to KevO for starting this important discussion.
We all need to take the time to educate ourselves on whats happening rather than just accept what a few with an agenda are feeding us all.
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Great info Candles. Brings to light some of the staggering numbers involved. Which for many is part of the problem, hearing things like Chevron announces a new oil discovery which could be between 3 and 15 Billion barrels. Thats 15,000,000,000 Barrels thats 630,000,000,000 Billion gallons of gas. For most of us that seems enourmous but in reality its a drop in the bucket and just months of supply not years. Thats the rediculous truth of the problems we are creating for ourselves and our children & Grandchildren. When you take a moment to understand current and projected concumtion it puts things in perspective. The World community consumes 80,000,000 Million Barrels of oil a day (2003), if converted to gas thats 3,360,000,000 Billion gallons of gas a day. Now obvioously its not all turned into gas but it gives a pretty good perspective on the crazy numbers involved per day.
How much CO2 do you think that is?????
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Guests
Guest Group |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Failed on what planet? Capitalism is alive and well, giving the citizens of the US the best standard of living in the world. You do realize our poor people own cars and have colored TV's cell phones etc? Where can you point to where communism or socialism has succeeded in doing anything but creating misery? (Except for the ruling class of course) France, which is slowly sinking under the weight of high taxes and people who will not work? Cuba, the workers paradise? China? Where? Also, if you read what I actually posted, not what you wished to see. You will find that I disagreed that Global Warming caused by man is an excepted scientific fact. I then posted links showing that there are scientists who disagree. I also said I did not believe that man caused global warming, but twice posted that anyone was free to disagree with me. I called nobody names, and in fact never said man did not cause global warming, I just said I did not believe it. I then went further and made fun of the True Believers in Global Warming that takes it as a tenet of their religion and can tolerate no deviation from their dogma. |
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
August 31, 2006
California Enacts Nation’s Toughest Global Warming Bill Scientists and Economists Laid Groundwork for Legislation
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Scotty
Adviser Group Joined: March 06 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The Siberian permafrost is now melting. The trapped methane is now bubbling out of the mud. Current estimates suggest that this will more than double the existing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Whilst many of us choose to debate its existence, global warming has already become self-sustaining. |
||
Heidi
V.I.P. Member Joined: June 20 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Hey Dispenser4hir: Have you ever heard of the "Precautionary Principle?"
The precautionary principle states that if the potential consequences of an action are severe or irreversible, in the absence of full scientific certainty the burden of proof falls on those who would advocate taking the action. The precautionary principle is most often applied in the context of the impact of human development or new technology on the environment and human health, as both involve complex systems where the consequences of actions may be unpredictable. The formal concept evolved out of the German socio-legal tradition in the 1930s, centering on the concept of good household management. [1] In German the concept is vorsorgeprinzip, which translates into English as precaution principle. The concept includes risk prevention, cost effectiveness, ethical responsibilities towards maintaining the integrity of natural systems, and the fallibility of human understanding. It can also be interpreted as the transfer of more generally applied precaution in daily life (e.g. buying insurance, using seat belts or consulting experts before decisions) to larger political arenas. Some environmental commentators take a more stringent interpretation of the precautionary principle, stating that proponents of a potentially harmful technology must show the new technology is harmless before the new technology is used.(Montague, 1998) GET IT?
|
||
Life is Good!
|
||
Mahshadin
Admin Group Joined: January 26 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3882 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Global Warming 101
Human Fingerprints Earth's surface has undergone unprecedented warming over the last century, particularly over the last two decades. Astonishingly, every single year since 1992 is in the current list of the 20 warmest years on record.[1,2] The natural patterns of climate have been altered. Like detectives, science sleuths seek the answer to "Whodunnit?" — are humans part of the cause? To answer this question, patterns observed by meteorologists and oceanographers are compared with patterns developed using sophisticated models of Earth's atmosphere and ocean. By matching the observed and modeled patterns, scientists can now positively identify the "human fingerprints" associated with the changes. The fingerprints that humans have left on Earth's climate are turning up in a diverse range of records and can be seen in the ocean, in the atmosphere, and at the surface.
In its 2001 report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated, "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities." [3] Carbon dioxide from fossil fuel burning and land clearing has been accumulating in the atmosphere, where it acts like a blanket keeping Earth warm and heating up the surface, ocean, and atmosphere. As a result, current levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years. [4,5,6] Background: Driving the Climate ("Forcing") Climate is influenced by many factors, both natural and human. [7] Things that increase temperature, such as increases in heat-trapping emissions from cars and power plants or an increase in the amount of radiation the sun emits, are examples of "positive" forcings or drivers. Volcanic events and some types of human-made pollution, both of which inject sunlight-reflecting aerosols into the atmosphere, lower temperature and are examples of "negative" forcings or drivers. Natural climate drivers include the sun's energy output, aerosols from volcanic activity, and changes in snow and ice cover. Human climate drivers include heat-trapping emissions from cars and power plants, aerosols from pollution, and soot particles. Much as the Air Force develops computer programs to simulate aircraft flight under different conditions, climate scientists develop computer programs to simulate global climate changes under different conditions. These programs use our knowledge of physical, chemical, and biological processes that occur within Earth's atmosphere and oceans and on its land surfaces. Mathematical models allow scientists to simulate the behavior of complex systems such as climate and explore how these systems respond to natural and human factors. Fingerprint 1: The Ocean Layers Warm The world's oceans have absorbed about 20 times as much heat as the atmosphere over the past half-century, leading to higher temperatures not only in surface waters but also in water 1,500 feet below the surface. [8,9] The measured increases in water temperature lie well outside the bounds of natural climate variation. Fingerprint 2: The Atmosphere Shifts Recent research shows that human activities have lifted the boundary of Earth's lower atmosphere. Known as the troposphere (from the Greek tropos, which means "turning"), this lowest layer of the atmosphere contains Earth's weather. The stable layer above is called the stratosphere. The boundary that separates the two layers, the tropopause, is as high as nine miles above the equator and as low as five miles above the poles. In an astounding development, a 2003 study showed that this tropopause has shifted upward over the last two decades by more than 900 feet. [10] The rising tropopause marks another human fingerprint on Earth's climate. In their search for clues, scientists compared two natural drivers of climate (solar changes and volcanic aerosols) and three human drivers of climate (heat-trapping emissions, aerosol pollution, and ozone depletion), altering these one at a time in their sophisticated models. Changes in the sun during the twentieth century have warmed both the troposphere and stratosphere. But human activities have increased heat-trapping emissions and decreased stratospheric ozone. This has led to the troposphere warming more because the increase in heat-trapping emissions is trapping more of Earth's outgoing heat. The stratosphere has cooled more because there is less ozone to absorb incoming sunlight to heat up the stratosphere. Both these effects combine to shift the boundary upward. Over the period 1979-1999, a study shows that human-induced changes in heat-trapping emissions and ozone account for more than 80 percent of the rise in tropopause height. [10] This is yet another example of how science detectives are quantifying the impact of human activities on climate. Fingerprint 3: The Surface Heats Up Measurements show that global average temperature has risen by 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit in the last 100 years, with most of that happening in the last three decades. [1,2] By comparing Earth's temperature over that last century with models comparing climate drivers, a study showed that, from 1950 to the present, most of the warming was caused by heat-trapping emissions from human activities [3]. In fact, heat-trapping emissions are driving the climate about three times more strongly now than they were in 1950. The spatial pattern of where this warming is occurring around the globe indicates human-induced causes. Even accounting for the occasional short-lived cooling from volcanic events and moderate levels of cooling from aerosol pollution as well as minor fluctuations in the sun's output in the last 30 years, heat-trapping emissions far outweigh any other current climate driver. Once again, our scientific fingerprinting identifies human activities as the main driver of our warming climate. Full article can be read here
|
||
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." G Orwell
|
||
Scotty
Adviser Group Joined: March 06 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 846 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Just a bit of clarification. It is perfectly possible for an event to occur 100% of the time, every time, forever, and yet fail to satisfy the requirements of "scientific proof". Hence Newton's experimental law.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |