Fauci Admits He Underestimated Asymptomatic Number
Printed From: Avian Flu Talk
Category: Main Forums
Forum Name: Latest News
Forum Description: (Latest Breaking News)
URL: http://www.avianflutalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=42446 Printed Date: April 26 2024 at 6:45am
Topic: Fauci Admits He Underestimated Asymptomatic NumberPosted By: ViQueen24
Subject: Fauci Admits He Underestimated Asymptomatic Number
Date Posted: April 07 2020 at 12:17pm
The idea that at least some coronavirus carriers don’t feel sick isn’t new. But the scale of Fauci’s estimate was.
“It’s somewhere between 25 and 50 percent” of the total, Fauci said. But “right now,” he went on, “we’re just guessing.”
Fifty percent is a staggering — and scary — number. To put it in perspective, an asymptomatic rate that high would theoretically double the confirmed U.S. case count to more than 700,000 infections (even though the actual number of infections is likely much larger, given all the issues with testing).
But is Fauci’s new estimate supported by science? And if so, what does it mean for the United States’ efforts to mitigate the spread of the virus and ultimately bring it under control?
The news might not be as bad as it looks.
The first thing to note is that Fauci himself expressed a high degree of uncertainty about his own numbers. “I don’t have any scientific data to say that,” he admitted Sunday. “You know when we’ll get the scientific data? When we get those antibody tests out there and we really know what the penetrance is. Then we can answer the questions in a scientifically sound way.”
Fauci was right to be cautious. As he noted, it’s impossible to say how many carriers never showed symptoms until you’ve tested a bunch of peoplewho never showed symptoms — something that will only happen after the worst of the pandemic is over and scientists start trying to determine, en masse, who does and doesn’t have immunity. (More on that later.)
But Fauci has reason to suspect the asymptomatic rate could be as high as 50 percent. Researchers initially assumed the coronavirus would spread much like its notorious sibling, the virus that caused SARS — that is, only from people who were clearly sick with fever and cough. “Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers,” Fauci himself said on Jan. 28.
Yet as the deadly pathogen shut down one country after another, evidence began to surface that sick people weren’t the only ones spreading it. Some of the new data came from Wuhan, China, where the pandemic originated. Some of it came from the Diamond Princesscruise ship, where more than 700 captive passengers and crew members tested positive. Some of it came from Iceland, where nearly 5 percent of the total population — sick or not — has been screened for the virus.
All of it pointed to the same conclusion: Silent carriers are real, and they are most likely infecting others.
“Immediate symptoms” is an important distinction. There is a difference between being asymptomatic (meaning you never get sick) and presymptomatic (meaning you haven’t gotten sick yet). The latter looks like the former, until it doesn’t.
“The substantial asymptomatic proportion for COVID-19 is quite alarming,” one of those epidemiologists, Dr. Gerardo Chowell of Georgia State University, told the New York Times.
The highest rate so far came from a biopharma company called deCODE, which has tested 9,000 nonsymptomatic, nonquarantined residents of Iceland on behalf of the country’s chief epidemiologist. Although fewer than 1 percent of the tests came back positive, the company’s founder told CNN that around 50 percent of those who tested positive said they didn’t feel sick.
That may be the source of Fauci’s high-end estimate; on Sunday, he didn’t cite any particular studies, and gesturing to the other experts onstage, he noted that “even among us, good friends that we are, we differ.”
Either way, asymptomatic transmission presents a significant near-term challenge. Several studies have also shown that people infected with the coronavirus are most contagious one to three days before they begin to show symptoms, and researchers in China recently discovered that one asymptomatic carrier had just as much virus in his system as his symptomatic peers — meaning that he was probably just as contagious.
In the long term, however, a huge, hidden population of asymptomatic cases may actually prove to be helpful. For one thing, it would mean that the coronavirus isn’t as deadly as initially feared, which could ease anxieties and inform public-health approaches going forward. It would also mean societies and economies could return to normal sooner than anticipated — assuming that universal antibody tests show that hundreds of thousands (or even millions) of people who never felt sick are now immune. The first such U.S. test was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on April 2.
“Making sure we are testing asymptomatic individuals to understand more about this virus is critical,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday. “It’s all part of figuring out whether people have immunity … in order to get [them] back into the workforce, or at least back in society.”
So as frightening as Fauci’s 50-percent estimate sounds today, Americans may ultimately be grateful if his “guess” turns out to be correct.
Replies: Posted By: AI
Date Posted: April 07 2020 at 1:11pm
I'm betting once the data is analysed and asymptomatic and mild cases are included the CFR for COVID19 will be about what the seasonal flu is.
Posted By: AI
Date Posted: April 07 2020 at 1:28pm
This guy thinks the total number of cases may be off by a magnitude of 50 to 100 and that it is far more transmissible than currently thought.
Posted By: FluMom
Date Posted: April 07 2020 at 1:48pm
It may be that we don't know how many have this until we really antibody test everyone. Then and only then will we know in hind sight what happened. If we can just live through this it would be great but I am thinking this may not be worse than a flu year deaths, 60k. It is the problem of so many in the hospital and death decisions that have to be made in such a short period of time that makes this so different from flu. If we did not SIP this could be really worse than it is today.
Posted By: Thorne!
Date Posted: April 07 2020 at 1:52pm
There is at least one study, this is from the University of TX
"Summary
Without a coordinated state or federal response to COVID-19 across the United States,
counties are left to weigh the potentially large yet unseen threat of COVID-19 with the
economic and societal costs of enacting strict social distancing measures. The
immediate and long-term risk of the virus can be difficult to grasp, given the lack of
historical precedent and that many cases go undetected. We calculated the risk that
there already is sustained community transmission that has not yet been detected.
Given the low testing rates throughout the country, we assume that one in ten cases are
tested and reported. If a county has detected only one case of COVID-19, there is a 51%
chance that there is already a growing outbreak underway. COVID-19 is likely spreading
in 72% of all counties in the US, containing 94% of the national population. Proactive
social distancing, even before two cases are confirmed, is prudent."
Posted By: BabyCat
Date Posted: April 07 2020 at 3:40pm
I suggested that, specifically, many weeks ago during China growth phase. Also, Specifically 50-75% several weeks ago using the Italian town testing data.
What this also means is this is likely far less virulent, and the (over)reactions more apparent.
Who was it that said this might be a "powderpuff"?
May be right after all.
Posted By: BabyCat
Date Posted: April 07 2020 at 3:42pm
AI wrote:
I'm betting once the data is analysed and asymptomatic and mild cases are included the CFR for COVID19 will be about what the seasonal flu is.
And thus, the level of epic economic destruction exposed for what it is: the greatest theft in history
Millions of SME (small and medium enterprises) destroyed, millions forced out of work. The Fed is buying EVERYTHING. What does that mean? They will OWN EVERYTHING. America was just bought up at bargain prices (with money the FED prints out of thin air), after a panic crash. YOU HAVE BEEN FOOLED. The debt will be owed for generations, 22 Trillion and rising. Fed balance sheet now $5 trillion. US debt crisis in the near future. Soon the petrodollar will collapse, and with it, the privileges of being able to print money the rest of the world must use. Bank-sponsored crypto-alternatives on the horizon.
Mass panic. Willing surrender of essential civil liberties. All for the "invisible enemy" (Trump's words).
Many people starting to see this more and more for what it is.
It's already TOO LATE. GAME OVER. The free markets NO LONGER EXIST and are dead.
Welcome to the new socialism. Bank takeover. The end.
Posted By: BabyCat
Date Posted: April 07 2020 at 4:12pm
Watch Sweden. They went with "herd immunity" but are now switching. Not because of large numbers of deaths so far, but panic at possible numbers ( https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/covid-19-sweden-s-less-stringent-measures-to-change-/1794325 - https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/covid-19-sweden-s-less-stringent-measures-to-change-/1794325 _ If ending numbers (deaths) aren't much greater than a seasonal flu it will be too much for people to understand what just happened.
Posted By: ViQueen24
Date Posted: April 07 2020 at 6:46pm
I'm not jumping to any conclusions quite yet. We are only less than midway through the first wave. Maybe by this time next year...
Posted By: pheasant
Date Posted: April 08 2020 at 3:34am
Well that was uplifting news followed by more news that makes you want to reach for a sedative.
I still don't want to be in New York, or Italy right now........I still do not want to be even near a hospital either.
------------- The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself......FDR
Posted By: Touchoftheblues
Date Posted: April 08 2020 at 12:48pm
I can't believe the "it's just the flu" argument is still around. Some junk studies making ridiculous assumptions brought this on.
Posted By: Touchoftheblues
Date Posted: April 08 2020 at 12:49pm
Lots of speculation in that comment babycat.
Posted By: WitchMisspelled
Date Posted: April 08 2020 at 3:43pm
BabyCat wrote:
Watch Sweden. They went with "herd immunity" but are now switching. Not because of large numbers of deaths so far, but panic at possible numbers ( https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/covid-19-sweden-s-less-stringent-measures-to-change-/1794325 - https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/covid-19-sweden-s-less-stringent-measures-to-change-/1794325 _ If ending numbers (deaths) aren't much greater than a seasonal flu it will be too much for people to understand what just happened.
I can report my cousin in Sweden have been VERY upset at the lack of measures being taken. He says many have taken it upon themselves to stay at home if they are able and take precautions. He doubled his vegetable garden space because he anticipates there being shortages. He also says the prepping guide for disaster and disease released to the public last year has been very helpful to many to be prepared for this to get much MUCH worse in Sweden.
Posted By: BabyCat
Date Posted: April 08 2020 at 4:55pm
Yeah, pretty much the same story all around. People panic for the government to "do something" and well, house arrests, economic destruction, government bailouts (of the well-connected) are that something.
Will there be a country who does "nothing" other than reasonable precautions in lieu of extended shutdowns, etc.?