Printed From: Avian Flu Talk
Category: Off Topic Forum
Forum Name: Political Discussion
Forum Description: (All about poiltics)
URL: http://www.avianflutalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=43357 Printed Date: April 28 2024 at 8:58am
Topic: How Trump Damaged SciencePosted By: Technophobe
Subject: How Trump Damaged Science
Date Posted: October 06 2020 at 1:38pm
I am not sure this should be in politics. Nature is the most respected scientific journal I know of. It has peers, many of them, but none quite as well respected. Anyway, here goes.
NEWS FEATURE
How Trump damaged science — and why it could take decades to recover
The US president’s actions have exacerbated the pandemic that has killed more than 200,000 people in the United States, rolled back environmental and public-health regulations and undermined science and scientific institutions. Some of the harm could be permanent.
P
eople packed in by the thousands, many dressed in red, white and blue and carrying signs reading “Four more years” and “Make America Great Again”. They came out during a global pandemic to make a statement, and that’s precisely why they assembled shoulder-to-shoulder without masks in a windowless warehouse, creating an ideal environment for the coronavirus to spread.
US President Donald Trump’s rally in Henderson, Nevada, on 13 September contravened state health rules, which limit public gatherings to 50 people and require proper social distancing. Trump knew it, and later flaunted the fact that the state authorities failed to stop him. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the president has behaved the same way and refused to follow basic health guidelines at the White House, which is now at the centre of an ongoing outbreak. As of 5 October, the president was in a hospital and was receiving experimental treatments.
Trump’s actions — and those of his staff and supporters — should come as no surprise. Over the past eight months, the president of the United States has lied about the dangers posed by the coronavirus and undermined efforts to contain it; he even admitted in an interview to purposefully misrepresenting the viral threat early in the pandemic. Trump has belittled masks and social-distancing requirements while encouraging people to protest against lockdown rules aimed at stopping disease transmission. His administration has undermined, suppressed and censored government scientists working to study the virus and reduce its harm. And his appointees have made political tools out of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), ordering the agencies to put out inaccurate information, issue ill-advised health guidance, and tout unproven and potentially harmful treatments for COVID-19.
“This is not just ineptitude, it’s sabotage,” says Jeffrey Shaman, an epidemiologist at Columbia University in New York City, who has modelled the evolution of the pandemic and how earlier interventions might have saved lives in the United States. “He has sabotaged efforts to keep people safe.”
The statistics are stark. The United States, an international powerhouse with vast scientific and economic resources, has experienced more than 7 million COVID-19 cases, and its death toll has passed 200,000 — more than any other nation and more than one-fifth of the global total, even though the United States accounts for just 4% of world population.
Quantifying Trump’s responsibility for deaths and disease across the country is difficult, and other wealthy countries have struggled to contain the virus; the United Kingdom has experienced a similar number of deaths as the United States, after adjusting for population size.
But Shaman and others suggest that the majority of the lives lost in the United States could have been saved had the country stepped up to the challenge earlier. Many experts blame Trump for the country’s failure to contain the outbreak, a charge also levelled by Olivia Troye, who was a member of the White House coronavirus task force. She said in September that the president repeatedly derailed efforts to contain the virus and save lives, focusing instead on his own political campaign .
As he seeks re-election on 3 November, Trump’s actions in the face of COVID-19 are just one example of the damage he has inflicted on science and its institutions over the past four years, with repercussions for lives and livelihoods. The president and his appointees have also back-pedalled on efforts to curb greenhouse-gas emissions, weakened rules limiting pollution and diminished the role of science at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Across many agencies, his administration has undermined scientific integrity by suppressing or distorting evidence to support political decisions, say policy experts.
“I’ve never seen such an orchestrated war on the environment or science,” says Christine Todd Whitman, who headed the EPA under former Republican president George W. Bush.
Trump has also eroded America’s position on the global stage through isolationist policies and rhetoric. By closing the nation’s doors to many visitors and non-European immigrants, he has made the United States less inviting to foreign students and researchers. And by demonizing international associations such as the World Health Organization, Trump has weakened America’s ability to respond to global crises and isolated the country’s science.
------------- How do you tell if a politician is lying? His lips or pen are moving.
Replies: Posted By: carbon20
Date Posted: October 10 2020 at 3:58pm
What chump did was pay back his backers.........
Who we all know only want bigger bank balances
Not interested about the health of the planet or people....
------------- Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.🖖
Marcus Aurelius
Posted By: Technophobe
Date Posted: October 11 2020 at 5:46am
The much-vaunted covid cure he got as an experimental treatment*, is in development by a company run by one of his golf buddies. Now there is a sound business reason to encourage the spread of the virus.
*The antibody cocktail derived from aborted fetal kidney cells, not the anti-viral drug or the steroids.
------------- How do you tell if a politician is lying? His lips or pen are moving.
Posted By: WitchMisspelled
Date Posted: October 11 2020 at 5:52am
Not to mention that the treatment itself is derived from fetus stem cells. Aborted fetus stem cells. I have to wonder what his evangelical base feels about that.
Posted By: Technophobe
Date Posted: October 11 2020 at 6:37am
I don't think the cells in question were "stem cells" but they were from aborted foetuses. I believe them to have been kidney cells.
In answer to your actual question: That is up to each individual and their own personal level of hypocracy.
------------- How do you tell if a politician is lying? His lips or pen are moving.
Posted By: WitchMisspelled
Date Posted: October 11 2020 at 6:42am
Okay. The one article I read on it stated Stem, but I'm sure you're right. Still makes me want to spit.