Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > General Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Ventilator death toll
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Online Discussion: Tracking new emerging diseases and the next pandemic since 2005; Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemic Discussion Forum.

Ventilator death toll

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Tabitha111 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: January 11 2020
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 5750
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tabitha111 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Ventilator death toll
    Posted: May 10 2020 at 1:30pm

Covid-19 pandemic: ventilator death toll sobering but ‘not conclusive’

https://www.timeslive.co.za/sunday-times/news/2020-05-10-covid-19-pandemic-ventilator-death-toll-sobering-but-not-conclusive/

10 May 2020 Claire Keeton


A snapshot of mortality among Covid-19 patients on ventilators in SA is sobering, but too small and incomplete to provide a reliable picture of patient survival.


Most people with Covid-19 who
go onto mechanical ventilators will die, international studies show. “Outcomes internationally have shown mortality rates of 60% to 95% in many countries, including the US, China and Italy,” said Wits University infectious diseases specialist Dr Jeremy Nel.


The National Institute for Communicable Diseases Covid-19 hospital sentinel surveillance report found that nine out of 10 patients ventilated in public hospitals die.


[snip]


Comment from monotreme 100 : People should not be dissuaded from going on a ventilator if there is a chance that it could save their lives.

 However, policy on stay-at-home orders should not be made based on the number of ventilators available. If one says, “We have X ventilators, therefore, until X people need ventilators, we can relax social distancing requirements” what one is really saying is “We will let 80% of X people die until we re-impose social distancing requirements”. Unfortunately, I don’t think most people know that the latter statement is what politicians are really saying.


People should also understand that one reason deaths lag infections is because many deaths will not occur until all the ventilators in a region are in use.

Then the deaths will occur very fast because triage will be imposed and ventilators will be denied to people who have no chance to survive without one. Ironically, the more spare ventilators a community has, the longer the true toll of relaxed social distancing can be hidden from the public.

'When you feel as though you can't do something, the simple antidote is action: Begin doing it. Start the process, even if it's just a simple step, and don't stop at the beginning.'
Marcus B
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down