Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Off Topic Forum > Off Topic Discussion > Talk about anything
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What Is A Genuine Depression?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

What Is A Genuine Depression?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: What Is A Genuine Depression?
    Posted: December 01 2014 at 8:54am
-
Back to Top
Satori View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 28655
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Satori Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2014 at 9:12am



The Working Poor: Welcome to Walmart!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-12-01/working-poor-welcome-walmart

“For the Privileged (especially those near the very top); life is a never-ending gravy-train. Their incomes soar higher and higher and higher – at a rate never before seen in our society. Their wealth soars higher and higher and higher – at a rate never before seen in our society.”

“Conversely; life for the “low social class”, the Serfs, is entirely opposite in every respect. Their standard of living falls lower and lower and lower – having collapsed by more than 50% since 1970″

“The lying politicians, lying bankers, and lying media tell all of the Serfs and the Homeless that this is “the New Normal”: their lives are supposed to get worse and worse and worse every year (while the lives of the Privileged get better and better and better). There’s “no money” to pay the Serfs a fair, livable wage claim the corporate Robber Barons.

Another lie. While Serf incomes remain permanently frozen (and their standard of living spirals relentlessly lower); corporate profits for U.S. corporations have more than doubled since 2000. This isn’t “normal”; it’s simple, economic rape: the Rich stealing from the (Working) Poor day after day, every day or their lives. How successful have they been with this stealing? The “Poor” used to be the Middle Class.”



there is a MASSIVE flow of wealth going on

from the bottom to the top


Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2014 at 6:17pm
Um actually that is not true.

The incomes of the rich sometimes go up on average and sometimes go down. Some economies hurt the rich and some help them. It depends.

The same is true of the poor.

We can add to that that generally the standard of living of all Americans has gone up a whole lot since our founding 200 years ago. It has almost always gone up, except for recessions, and only now might it be going down slightly as a more permanent trend that our government is calling the "new normal" when it refers to our economy.

It is also true that the poor have never needed to work so little to receive so much. 50% of the population pays no income taxes and many of those receive money back on their taxes, welfare, disability, social security, aid to dependent families, EIC payments, food stamps, public aid, housing assistance, etc the list goes on. Some people can work not at all and rake in close to 50 thousand dollars in benefits.

But what about the wage gap? The biggest determinant of a wage gap is being a single mother. Most of the poor are poor because they are single mothers who spend so much time raising small children that they can't work much. Duh. So we all know they should not have had children if they could not afford them. But that is water under the bridge. Our safety net means we will give them money. But what we do not need to do is cry foul because they are not as rich as the family with three or more adults who have been establishing their careers for 20 or more years and now earn lots of money. Yes you got that right. The biggest determinant of who is rich is large family size and length of time to establish a career. Is it really fair to compare single mothers to older multi generational families and then complain that there is a wage gap? No it is not.

But even if we did compare apples to apples one rich guy of a certain age makes more than one poor guy of the same age. Well, yes by definition that is true. Is it a problem that one guy makes more than another? The guy who went to school for sixteen years before becoming a doctor then works 14 hours a day at $200 per hour is going to make more than the guy who did not graduate from high school. Not only will he make more but he will invest the overflow and make money on that too. That is not a crime. Unless it is a crime - unless he as committed fraud along the way. IF he committed fraud then he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. If the government and politicians stopped worrying about hard workers making more than those who do not work as hard and focused on stopping fraud the world would be the just place it should be.
Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2014 at 6:26pm
p.s. there is no such thing as class in the U.S. Class does not mean just rich or poor. Class means a permanent station that is superior or inferior to the other stations.

In the Unites States we do not have titles and wealth is by no means permanent. You insult your fellow citizens if you claim that we do have classes.

Now the U.S. is one of the best countries in the world because poor people often stop being poor as their life goes on. Remember that the biggest reason to be poor is that you are a single mom. That is not permanent by any means. Many single moms get married or their kids grow up. The second biggest determinant of being poor is that you are a college student. And many of them graduate and get good jobs. So you see the biggest categories of the poor stop being poor as time goes on. Even those who do not fall into those categories often stop being poor as time goes on. It is a small percent who are permanently poor.

Now the same thing happens to rich people. Not all of them stay rich. Many of them stop being rich as time goes on. The biggest reason they stop being rich is that they get old and stop working. But there are other reasons too.

I did not feel like looking up the stats to prove that we live in a country with a lot of movement between rich and poor but you are all welcome to do it yourself.
Back to Top
Satori View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 28655
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Satori Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2014 at 6:27pm

ummm

actually it is


just one example


http://mashable.com/2014/11/10/wealth-inequality-united-states/


a paper entitled "Exploding wealth inequality in the United States." Emmanuel Saez and Gabrial Zucman found that the share of overall wealth held by the top 0.1% of those in the U.S. had grown to nearly equal the bottom 90%."


0.1% now control 90% of the wealth in this country


that leaves the other 300 MILLION plus to fight over the last 10% of the scraps


sorry

that's just the way it is


"

Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2014 at 10:46pm
I have read the article you posted. From your article:

"Saez and Zucman's data highlights how the post-Depression era saw massive transfer of wealth from the rich to the rest of the country topped out in the mid 1980s"

Which means that some economies make the rich grow poorer just as I said.

Also in the article you posted yourself there is a nice graph with a red line showing the wealth of rich people and a blue line showing the wealth of poor people. You will notice that sometimes the red line is above the blue line and sometimes it is below. Sometimes the red line goes up and some times it goes down while the same is true for the blue line. In short the graph proves exactly what I said - that both the wealthy and the poor sometimes benefit and sometimes suffer. All from your article so no the rich do not always get richer.

How about right now? Here is an article that is not written by just two economists with who knows what political persuasion but uses actual data from the IRS and quotes a variety of sources.

(the type seems to be oddly colored when I pasted it but hopefully will still be able to be read. If not I will put a link at the end)

"Obama is shrewdly characterizing the recession in a way that breeds resentment towards the wealthy, diverting dissatisfaction away from himself. Most of his recent speeches include assertions that there are a few Americans getting rich, while everyone else is suffering. “The notion that we would ask sacrifice from folks who are already struggling in order to protect folks who have never been better -- never been better off -- that's not who we are,” he said in one recent speech. Obama knows that if he can direct Americans’ unhappiness over the economy towards “the rich,” he might win reelection.

The problem is this is not accurate. During recessions, it is typical for the incomes of the rich to fall faster than the middle class. Of the millionaires you know, how many of them are now struggling financially? The only Americans who appear to be getting richer are government employees. Obama uses slick accounting gimmicks to back up his claim that the rich are getting richer.

The recession has not increased income inequality. The number of millionaires in the US has declined by 39 percent since 2007, and the so-called super rich, Americans making more than $10 million per year, has fallen by 55 percent. Even the liberal New York Times recently admitted that the rich have become poorer since Obama took office.

The most recent data from the IRS reveals that between 2007 and 2009, income of those in the 99th percentile income bracket fell from $410,096 to $343,927. The 99.9th percentile income fell from $2,155,365 to $1,432,890. The top one percent’s income, which mostly climbed throughout the 2000s, has fallen to lower levels than in 2000. The top one percent earned only 16.9 percent of all adjusted gross income last year, down from 20 percent in 2008."



Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2014 at 10:59pm
During the cut and paste that got messed up so here is the link:

http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2012/04/10/the_rich_are_getting_poorer_under_obama/page/full

Basically the article said that due to the poor economy the rich are loosing their wealth faster than the poor and that this is typical of poor economies.

But back to the basic question: what is wrong with rich people being rich? If they did not steal the money then nothing is wrong with it. If it was earned in a fair trade then for every dollar they got someone else got something of value that was worth a dollar. If Oprah Winfrey earned a penny for each person who watched one of her shows then the person who watched the show received a pennies worth of entertainment. She earned her wealth. The fact that she spent her time producing something of value while those who watched her show spent their time engaged in entertainment does not in any way change that it was a fair trade.

Now on the other hand if the wealthy received their money not fairly but through fraud or cronyism then that is a problem. But that would be a problem regardless of how much money they do or do not have. How about first we stop all the illegitimate sources of income. We stop the fraud, stealing, white collar crime, the inside deals, the closed door payoffs, etc. Then if some people are still richer we can rest assured that all is right. But if some people are not richer - if in fact wealth becomes more spread out then we will know that the problem all along was criminality and not wealth.

But what we must not do is assume that rich people have done something wrong without any trial at all. We must not redistribute their wealth without doing anything at all to end the corrupt system that gives bad people wealth. That is not a solution that is just a way to feel good about allowing corruption to continue. Now who in their right mind would want to let corruption continue while just skimming some of the ill gotten gains from both bad wealthy people AND honest wealthy people to poor people? Our leaders perhaps?

In all of this remember that every time you see a statistic that the wealthy are so much richer than everyone else that the stats have been manipulated by the people who want the system to continue almost just like it is. They define wealthy people and poor people in ways that skew the results. 
Back to Top
ViQueen24 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: May 14 2013
Location: Verona, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 12270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ViQueen24 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2014 at 11:15pm
Jeez, do almost no work and get almost 50 grand? Please tell me how to get that gig. I worked my fanny off this year and will probably make a little over $17,000. I pay out about $100 in taxes, etc., every two weeks when I get paid. This year I got $18 back; next year I will probably owe. EIC? Not for the past four years. The only help I got was the credits toward my Obamacare. My share was $81/month. My retired mother was forced to sacrifice satellite TV, which i was paying for, so that I could pay for Obamacare. Now I receive word that my current plan will go up to $122/month. Affordable care, my fanny! And I used it not once this year, as i didn't go to a doctor.

Let us remember that the NFL and NHL pay no income tax in America. Same for a good many corporations. So we pay their share, as well as our own.

And lastly do we, in this situation, view those females who were married when they had the children, and then got divorced as single mothers, or just those who were never married?

If people waited till they were sure they could afford to have children, the earth's population would be a hell of a lot smaller.
Back to Top
Kilt2 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: December 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 7414
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kilt2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2014 at 4:13am
A genuine Depression is the period of Deflation and Deleveraging in a Secular Bear Market and a Post Bubble Economy.

It is manifest by a rolling recession every couple of years with negative GDP and because of Deleverage, all spare money goes to pay down debt so with no consumer spending, retail businesses go broke along with manufacturing and primary and secondary production resulting in Unemployment around 25% or 30%.

It can only be solved with a world war.

Read Kondratieff and Shiller.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.
Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2014 at 12:05pm
Originally posted by ViQueen24 ViQueen24 wrote:

Jeez, do almost no work and get almost 50 grand? Please tell me how to get that gig. I worked my fanny off this year and will probably make a little over $17,000. I pay out about $100 in taxes, etc., every two weeks when I get paid. This year I got $18 back; next year I will probably owe. EIC? Not for the past four years. The only help I got was the credits toward my Obamacare. My share was $81/month. My retired mother was forced to sacrifice satellite TV, which i was paying for, so that I could pay for Obamacare. Now I receive word that my current plan will go up to $122/month. Affordable care, my fanny! And I used it not once this year, as i didn't go to a doctor.

Let us remember that the NFL and NHL pay no income tax in America. Same for a good many corporations. So we pay their share, as well as our own.

And lastly do we, in this situation, view those females who were married when they had the children, and then got divorced as single mothers, or just those who were never married?

If people waited till they were sure they could afford to have children, the earth's population would be a hell of a lot smaller.

If you want to make a lot in government benefits first pick the state you want to live in and pick one that has high welfare. Hawaii pays about $50,000 in tax free welfare. 
http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/09/02/on-labor-day-2013-welfare-pays-more-than-minimum-wage-work-in-35-states/

Now have three kids and get the EIC for about $6000
http://www.massresources.org/earned-income-credit-benefits.html

Now add housing assistance in which you pay a third of the rent and the gov picks up the other two thirds. If you rent is $700 per month then you get a value of $5599 per year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_8_(housing)

Food stamps translate to $500 per month or $6000 per year
http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/how-much-could-i-receive

Obamacare equals $22030 per year.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/danmunro/2013/05/22/annual-healthcare-costs-surpasses-22000/

I have listed five government programs that will give a woman and her children a total of about $83,629 per year tax free and with no requirement to work at all. I could not find the stat I wanted that listed the total number of government programs that exist which each give money to poor people but if I remember correctly that are about 200 (126 federal programs plus ? state programs) .

And if in addition to being poor you are disabled also then you can add in a few more programs. SSDI alone will give a maximum of $2642 per month for a total of $31,704 per year.

You can't get all the programs and you can't get some with others but an estimate that some could easily get $50,000 per year is an estimate I stand by.

I agree with you completely that corporations should not pay no income tax. The solution is not to make those who do pay income tax pay more. The solution is to have an income tax system in which everyone pays a small percent. But according to what you are saying you are not paying their share, someone else is.

I do not feel your pain regarding your mother needing to cancel her dish. I have never had Satellite in my life because I always scrimp and save my money. I feel little empathy for people who are paying for luxuries while collecting money from the gov while I am sacrificing those same luxuries and paying more than my share.

And those poor people who can collect money from the government  - just how poor are they?

I encourage everyone to read this:
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/09/understanding-poverty-in-the-united-states-surprising-facts-about-americas-poor

  • 80 percent of poor households have air conditioning. In 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
  • 92 percent of poor households have a microwave.
  • Nearly three-fourths have a car or truck, and 31 percent have two or more cars or trucks.
  • Nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite TV.
  • Two-thirds have at least one DVD player, and 70 percent have a VCR.
  • Half have a personal computer, and one in seven have two or more computers.
  • More than half of poor families with children have a video game system, such as an Xbox or PlayStation.
  • 43 percent have Internet access.
  • One-third have a wide-screen plasma or LCD TV.
  • One-fourth have a digital video recorder system, such as a TiVo.

Back to Top
Satori View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 28655
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Satori Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2014 at 1:02pm

1/10 of the population controls 90% of the wealth


enough said


explain that


apparently that is not enough to satisfy you


what should it be 95% or 99% ???


give us a number


and I would love to go through and shred the talking points from Heritage

but I'm not gonna waste my time

anyone with a semblance of critical thinking skills is insulted by that garbage

Back to Top
Kay View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: October 22 2014
Location: OHIO
Status: Offline
Points: 7205
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2014 at 1:51pm
 Sleeping too much, poor hygeine, idle hands.Unhappy
Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2014 at 4:59pm
Originally posted by Satori Satori wrote:

1/10 of the population controls 90% of the wealth


enough said


explain that


apparently that is not enough to satisfy you


what should it be 95% or 99% ???


give us a number


and I would love to go through and shred the talking points from Heritage

but I'm not gonna waste my time

anyone with a semblance of critical thinking skills is insulted by that garbage


If every single person on the planet decided to give every single item of value to a single person and they did it for all the right reasons then I have no problem at all with that.

If on the other hand a single penny of that was taken under fraudulent circumstances then bring him up on charges.

How much wealth is held by whom is of no significance. What is the only thing of significance is whether or not money that changes hands does so morally.

When you say that 10% of the population owns 90% of the wealth I suppose you are attempting to use statistics to demonstrate that the money was not traded legitimately. But that is sloppy. So instead of being sloppy and letting our politicians manipulate us into becoming ever more like a communist regime (which only leads to mass murder) let us instead focus on how money should be changing hands freely and without coercion.

You want me to explain why 10% of the population owns 90% of the wealth. You think that your statistic is enough that any reasonable person should want to take the money from those that have it and give it to those that have less. I will explain it but fair is fair and you have some explaining to do too.

The reason so many people have so much of the wealth is:

Some people value wealth very much and work very hard for it while other people value intangible things like family and love and free time and they do not work so hard for money.

Some people have more talent so they earn more.

Some people have more luck.

And some people use coercion to take money from others.

For every rich person some combination of the above four items explains whey they have more money than some other person. What we cannot do is prosecute anyone for the first three reasons or ignore the last reason.

When politicians say that we need to take money from people who have more what they are saying is that the four reasons people have money makes no difference at all. They are saying that they are not interested in prosecuting people who are guilty of the fourth reason. Is that what we want? Do we want to ignore that some people defraud, steal, and coerce money from their fellow man?

And if we do ignore those four reasons that people have money and we take it from them with no evidence of guilt are we not by our very actions legitimizing the taking of money from people for no reason other than that it can be done? If it is ok to take money from one group of people to give to another group of people then we have just said it is ok for the rich to take money from the poor. I don't want that.

What would the world look like if all trades of money or items of value were fair and free and absent of fraud, theft, and coercion? Would the money in the world be distributed more equally than it is? If so then that is the goal we need to work for.
Back to Top
Satori View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 28655
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Satori Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2014 at 5:14pm

umm

that is one tenth of a percent controls 90% of the wealth

and since that does not seem to be enough for you

how much wealth should that one tent of a percent control


I suppose your are a great supporter of trickle down economics ???


do you understand how great wealth is acquired?

do you understand how it is increased ?

your posts indicate a resounding NO to both those questions

hint

look to history

nothing changes

nothing

Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2014 at 5:29pm
Originally posted by Satori Satori wrote:

umm

that is one tenth of a percent controls 90% of the wealth

and since that does not seem to be enough for you

how much wealth should that one tent of a percent control

I already answered that and you did not understand it the first time. So again I do not care how much of what is owned by whom as long as it is owned through honest means. Yet your words "does not seem to be enough for you" indicates that you think I want rich people to have more. I do not want rich people to have either more or less. I want whatever people have to be earned justly.

Now you answer the question. How much should be owned by whom and does it matter how it is gotten? Is it ever honest for the money to be taken from someone of they do not receive something of equal value in a direct exchange?

Quote  I suppose your are a great supporter of trickle down economics ???


Nope. People who favor or disfavor trickle down economics are people who want to manipulate the market probably for their own benefit and at the expense of someone else. Assuming you do not like trickle down economics what system do you like? Do you believe that a struggling father who works three part time jobs and who works hard for his money should be allowed to keep it? Does it really matter if he is a father or a mother or anyone for that matter. If the person works hard and honestly should he be allowed to keep his own money?


Quote do you understand how great wealth is acquired?

Yes. effort, skill, luck, and fraud.

Quote do you understand how it is increased ?

Yes. effort, skill, luck, and fraud.

Quote your posts indicate a resounding NO to both those questions

hint

look to history

nothing changes

nothing


Through all history wealthy has been acquired and increased through a combination of effort, skill, luck, and fraud (which I am using to include and use of deceit or force).

But if you have an example of wealth being acquired in some other way please share with us.
Back to Top
ViQueen24 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: May 14 2013
Location: Verona, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 12270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ViQueen24 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2014 at 10:43pm
ASB, please read more carefully. 1. I was being sarcastic when I asked how to get that gig. 20 years ago, when my mother became disabled, I bailed out of my life elsewhere and worked four jobs here rather than her be on welfare or lose her house. 2. My mother did not have to cancel her satellite, I did, because I didn't think it was right to accept credits toward Obamacare and have satellite. And no way could I have afforded to pay for both. My mother and I co-own our home and split the bills. I went to free over-the-air TV, which is what I can now afford. The signal drops and becomes pixilated and she has to get up and move the antenna around alot. She's handicapped and it sucks for her. After working 34 years as a nurse, she deserves a little something for her amusement, but I had to cancel it to comply with the law and get Obamacare. No one is asking you to feel bad. I'm saying I feel bad, like I'm letting my mother down. 3. "Someone else is paying" for the corporations who are not paying, not me? Well, let's see, last pay i cleared $558. I paid out $109, $10 of which went to Social Security, the rest for various taxes. There are 64 people that work at the turnpike plaza i work at. 4 are managers and are making alot more money than i am; 14,including the four managers, are married/cohabitating and with combined incomes are probably paying more in taxes. There are only two of us getting Obamacare, 4 getting food stamps, one gets "underemployment" when the company cuts him down to two days a week in the winter. Most of us used to be in better job situations in steel/manufacturing/tech, till we were deemed too old, or our companies folded, merged or downsized. We got these kind of jobs rather than go on welfare and be one of those people you were talking about. A handful of us took these jobs "temporarily till our ailing loved ones got back on their feet", only they never did. Your comments that "someone else" is compensating for the corporations' loopholing tax-dodging, not me, or people like me in plazas and workplaces like it all over this country is a slap in the face.

I know, paragraphs. Sorry, did not intend to go on so long. The good news is that roughly 1/4 of my workplace are kids who are working their way through school so that they can eventually pick up more of the corporations' tab than half of us in the plaza are capable of doing at this time.
Back to Top
ViQueen24 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: May 14 2013
Location: Verona, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 12270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ViQueen24 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2014 at 12:45am
http://thefederalist.com/2013/09/30/calculating-the-real-cost-of-corporate-welfare/


http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/04/do_the_poor_really_pay_no_taxe.html

The comments on the second link are enlightening. Could not find any stats on how much of the corporate tab the poor or the lower middle class, (which I, my mother, and most of my adult plaza-mates are a part) wind up paying, but the second link cements my opinion that we pay our share, proportionate to income.

Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2014 at 6:49am
Originally posted by ViQueen24 ViQueen24 wrote:

ASB, please read more carefully. 1. I was being sarcastic when I asked how to get that gig. 20 years ago, when my mother became disabled, I bailed out of my life elsewhere and worked four jobs here rather than her be on welfare or lose her house. 2. My mother did not have to cancel her satellite, I did, because I didn't think it was right to accept credits toward Obamacare and have satellite. And no way could I have afforded to pay for both. My mother and I co-own our home and split the bills. I went to free over-the-air TV, which is what I can now afford. The signal drops and becomes pixilated and she has to get up and move the antenna around alot. She's handicapped and it sucks for her. After working 34 years as a nurse, she deserves a little something for her amusement, but I had to cancel it to comply with the law and get Obamacare. No one is asking you to feel bad. I'm saying I feel bad, like I'm letting my mother down. 3. "Someone else is paying" for the corporations who are not paying, not me? Well, let's see, last pay i cleared $558. I paid out $109, $10 of which went to Social Security, the rest for various taxes. There are 64 people that work at the turnpike plaza i work at. 4 are managers and are making alot more money than i am; 14,including the four managers, are married/cohabitating and with combined incomes are probably paying more in taxes. There are only two of us getting Obamacare, 4 getting food stamps, one gets "underemployment" when the company cuts him down to two days a week in the winter. Most of us used to be in better job situations in steel/manufacturing/tech, till we were deemed too old, or our companies folded, merged or downsized. We got these kind of jobs rather than go on welfare and be one of those people you were talking about. A handful of us took these jobs "temporarily till our ailing loved ones got back on their feet", only they never did. Your comments that "someone else" is compensating for the corporations' loopholing tax-dodging, not me, or people like me in plazas and workplaces like it all over this country is a slap in the face.

I know, paragraphs. Sorry, did not intend to go on so long. The good news is that roughly 1/4 of my workplace are kids who are working their way through school so that they can eventually pick up more of the corporations' tab than half of us in the plaza are capable of doing at this time.

My apologies. I did not realize that was sarcasm. Reading over your post again I still don't see how I would have known it was sarcasm. There are actually quite a few people I have encountered who would say what you said and mean every word of it so when I read that I assumed you were one of them.

Your actions are commendable.

And yes it is good when people work so they can contribute to society. And yes there are corporations that take advantage of the system however it seems like you are categorically placing the blame for problems on corporations which might indicate too much listening to the communists who are out there spreading that message. A boy gets shot in Ferguson and the communists are there blaming Anhouser Busch. You can't make this stuff up that is really happening. 

 In case you think I am being too paranoid about these false narratives google "fascism and Ukraine" and you will see that Putin is actively trying to blame the situation in the Ukraine on Fascists as if he is the great savior freeing Russions from Neo-nazis. The same lies are spread over and over with less truth than we would hope for. Does anyone really believe Jews are part of a secret plot to take over the world. Well yes there are people who believe that craziness.

Corporitism is bad and it does exist but to start thinking that corporations in general are bad or that wealth in general is bad is misplaced blame.
Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2014 at 7:09am
Originally posted by ViQueen24 ViQueen24 wrote:

http://thefederalist.com/2013/09/30/calculating-the-real-cost-of-corporate-welfare/


http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/04/do_the_poor_really_pay_no_taxe.html

The comments on the second link are enlightening. Could not find any stats on how much of the corporate tab the poor or the lower middle class, (which I, my mother, and most of my adult plaza-mates are a part) wind up paying, but the second link cements my opinion that we pay our share, proportionate to income.


You realize that the retired policeman in the first link is a communist who was one of the protesters at the Occupy Wall street movement? Are we going to accept as truth the unverified statements of a professional communist agitator with an axe to grind?

Does that mean that I like corporate welfare. No, I hate it and all corporate welfare should be abolished. But people who blame corporations for corporate welfare and fail to see the role that politicians play in that game are deluding themeselves. It takes two to tango and the corporations and the politicians are dancing up a storm. The politicians are very good at pointing their fingers at corporations and people believe that tripe. I would rank corporitism right up there with socialism and communism and fascism in terms of how evil it is. But that does not mean that all corporations or the nature of corporations is bad. It also does not mean that all politicians are bad. Neither can we say that all democrats or all republicans are bad. 

What should we do about it? Let's stop letting manipulators tell us where to point our fingers. Let's point to specific examples of wrongdoing and when it is a politician throw the bum out and when it is a corporation prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

The second link indicated that the poor recieve more back in income taxes than they pay in but because they pay in they are not really paying no federal income taxes. That's gobbledy gook. They fill out a 1040 and they get money - enough said. It is correct that they pay quite a bit in social security, and unemployment insurance. The article did not say it but it would also be true that they pay a lot in sales tax. And real estate taxes either directly or indirectly. So if you hear someone say that they pay no taxes at all they would be wrong. It is still correct to say that they pay no federal income taxes or as the article stated it "technically correct".  And it is not right. Lets get a simpler tax system - how about a two line form instead of the thousands of pages presently in the tax code. First line: "How much did you make?" Second line: "Send in 10%" No corporate welfare and no EIC and no other crap.
Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2014 at 7:14am
Dear VIQueen24,

Perhaps this is the figure you wanted:

The Cato Institute estimates that the U.S. federal government spends $100 billion a year on corporate welfare. That's an average of $870 for each one of America's 115 million families. Cato notes that this includes "cash payments to farmers and research funds to high-tech companies, as well as indirect subsidies, such as funding for overseas promotion of specific U.S. products and industries...It does not include tax preferences or trade restrictions."
Back to Top
ViQueen24 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: May 14 2013
Location: Verona, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 12270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ViQueen24 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 05 2014 at 1:28am
No, ASB, I do not need (communists, socialists, fascists, or anyone one may choose to favor with those or other labels) to tell me how to perceive what i see every day i work. I work for a corporation, and get to see the way it and the one in the adjoined building operate. I know how they think, how they rationalize, how they lie, how they have their employees defend policies to our customers that only serve the corporation, not the employees, and contrary to what most customers think, those rules do not favor the customer. Neither, despite what the customer thinks, do they usually have that much power, because they usually have no idea why things are done the way they are, because employees are threatened with "corrective action" if they tell the customer the truth. Do you know that my company will not promote you if you have even once been written up for anything. I know that not all corporations are bad, but it is not hard for me to believe the bad things that the (your convenient label here) say, because I have seen so much of it in 9 years with this company, the one next door, and others in my 31 working years. With any luck, within a year or two I will have successfully launched my own business, and be able to make a long-overdue exit.

Sadly, most of my co-workers describe equally bad stories about other corporations they have worked for, leading me to believe whether we are talking about corporate welfare, or the way they treat their employees and customers, either way we are talking about such a lack of integrity that they deserve defense from no one.

You must excuse me, but alot of my reaction a day or two ago is because I get heartily sick and tired of the way hard-working poor people are lumped in with welfare queens, lazy deadbeats, etc. At my plaza, of course you will find the lazy and the under-performing just like you will anywhere, but most there are a pretty awesome bunch who go far above the call of duty and of their pay grade to look out for the customers as well as each other. Many are quiet everyday heroes with stories similar to what you would see on "Undercover Boss", and deserve as much or more respect as entertainers, sports figures or people with letters after their names. And they rarely get it.
Back to Top
ASB View Drop Down
V.I.P. Member
V.I.P. Member


Joined: October 16 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 690
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ASB Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 05 2014 at 10:20am
Originally posted by ViQueen24 ViQueen24 wrote:

No, ASB, I do not need (communists, socialists, fascists, or anyone one may choose to favor with those or other labels) to tell me how to perceive what i see every day i work. I work for a corporation, and get to see the way it and the one in the adjoined building operate. I know how they think, how they rationalize, how they lie, how they have their employees defend policies to our customers that only serve the corporation, not the employees, and contrary to what most customers think, those rules do not favor the customer. Neither, despite what the customer thinks, do they usually have that much power, because they usually have no idea why things are done the way they are, because employees are threatened with "corrective action" if they tell the customer the truth. Do you know that my company will not promote you if you have even once been written up for anything. I know that not all corporations are bad, but it is not hard for me to believe the bad things that the (your convenient label here) say, because I have seen so much of it in 9 years with this company, the one next door, and others in my 31 working years. With any luck, within a year or two I will have successfully launched my own business, and be able to make a long-overdue exit.

Sadly, most of my co-workers describe equally bad stories about other corporations they have worked for, leading me to believe whether we are talking about corporate welfare, or the way they treat their employees and customers, either way we are talking about such a lack of integrity that they deserve defense from no one.

You must excuse me, but alot of my reaction a day or two ago is because I get heartily sick and tired of the way hard-working poor people are lumped in with welfare queens, lazy deadbeats, etc. At my plaza, of course you will find the lazy and the under-performing just like you will anywhere, but most there are a pretty awesome bunch who go far above the call of duty and of their pay grade to look out for the customers as well as each other. Many are quiet everyday heroes with stories similar to what you would see on "Undercover Boss", and deserve as much or more respect as entertainers, sports figures or people with letters after their names. And they rarely get it.

You may have noticed that I admire hard honest work and therefore I admire how you and your coworkers work for you money.

You may have also noticed that I hate corporatism much like you do. Corporatism is of course not the same as the existence of a corporation. Corporatism happens when governments with the power of the gun cooperate with corporations with the power of the purse. Together these two powers are hard to resist and they have much control over our lives. The company you work for is one that you do not admire and for good reasons. You note of course that your company (as a toll plaza collector)  is one of the ones that has allied itself with the state. Your company is far more likely to be guilty of corporatism than the majority of companies out there that are owned by mom and pop operations. You would like to own your own business some day. Will it be a sole proprietership in which if you get sued you can loose all the business is worth and all your personal assets too or will you spend less than a thousand dollars to make it a corporations and protect yourself from such lawsuits? The chances are high that you will own a corporation and that you will run it with integrity just like all the other small guys out there who have done what you want to do. You may hire people, and buy inventory, and make the economy run. That is admirable.

Do you want people to blame you for making the world a bad place because you own a business? People will say that your business is evil and they will demand that you be punished for your evil by having to pay more in taxes. (they wont say you should be punished for your evil by being sent to jail which is what they should be saying if you were in fact evil) Do you want to pay extra taxes because you are an evil  business or would you want everyone to pay fair taxes? Do you want to punish people like you who make money through talent, hard work, and luck, by taxing them more or do you want to punish people who make money through coercion by sending them to jail?

I wish you all the best in opening your own business. Maybe in the mean time you will document all the bad stuff your present employer does and when you are ready to leave you can become a whistleblower. We need more people like you and less people like them. They have money and you do not yet have money. But that is not the important difference, the important difference is that you want to engage in fair trade with people. You want to trade your product for your customers money where everybody wins. They want to take money from people who if they do not pay will receive a ticket, and if they do not pay that ticket the sheriff, the officer of the state, will eventually visit with his gun. They like coercion and they are very willing to apply their coercive tactics to you too. The important difference is always coercion, fraud, theft, lying, etc. It is never ok to ignore these or to use them as an excuse to merely increase taxes.

Because if we think about it we know how that system works. The lovers of coercion (evil corporations) make deals with the other lovers of coercion (politicians), the evil corporations make more money compared to the just corporations, they get taxed more but not more than they earn, they have money left over to pay off the politicians and still walk away with a profit. Meanwhile, everyday people suffer because they also get stuck with those higher taxes but they don't get the crony profits.

The answer is to punish coercion not moneymaking. We all want and deserve to keep our own money. We all want to trade with each other fairly. This is the basis of capitalism. Crony capitalism actually does not exist because coercion is a part of it and coercion does not exist in free markets. By the way a FREE market is one that by definition is FREE from coercion. A better name for crony capitalism would be crony socialism because it always exists when the state owns money that should belong to the people. We should all seek greater freedom of trade - greater capitalism. Those who oppose people fairly trading with each other and keeping what they earn honestly are opposing freedom and they are invariably the communists or their dupes.

You want to own a business. You want fair trade. You want to keep what you earn. You hate the coercive nature of the evil crony corporatist you work for. You like money because you can use it to feed your children and help the poor.  You want your future customers to be happy and keep the money they earn too so they too can feed their kids and help the poor.  Having money is not evil, being a corporation is not evil. Coercion is evil. In short, you are a capitalist and you hate communism because it is always always coercive.
Back to Top
ViQueen24 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: May 14 2013
Location: Verona, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 12270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ViQueen24 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 05 2014 at 10:49am
Actually, ASB, I am not a toll collector, I work inside the service plaza selling food, drinks, etc. I work for a corporation that made last year about 6 billion dollars administering that service throughout most of the toll plazas and airports in the US and Canada. I am ambivalent about the coercion. On one hand, honestly, I am very good at selling our products. I have to be; it's the secret to longevity and proliferation at this business. Simply put, those who are the best at selling, cleaning, organizing, and managing the youngsters to do the same are rewarded with hours; those who don't, are chewed up and spit out. What I dislike is the dishonesty and lack of fairness to employees and customers, and the fact that alot of the product's quality is not commesurate with the price being paid. The store I work at is a franchise, which is operated differently than a corporate-run store of the same ilk, causing confusion and frustration for the the customers, which is frequently taken out on us. The customers really don't understand or believe that we have to do things differently than their neighborhood corporate-run store or we will lose hours.

The rest of what you say is spot on, labels notwithstanding, and be assured, I have been documenting the company's violations since 2011 for the very reason you stated. I don't want to be a hero about it, I simply hate dishonesty and unfairness.
Back to Top
KiwiMum View Drop Down
Chief Moderator
Chief Moderator
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 29670
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KiwiMum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 05 2014 at 5:13pm
I was listening to a radio commentator a while back talking about the Occupy protest and in the course of the discussion it was mooted that the protesters were against the banks and wanted to see their downfall because they (the protesters) had nothing in the banks except debt. That people with savings weren't protesting. 

We live in a society where the younger generations don't have any tangible assets and they have debt and more debt. No wonder people are dissatisfied. But as far as having debt goes, we have no one to blame but ourselves. No one forces you to buy a huge plasma tv on your visa card, or to take holidays that you can't afford. 

According to statistics, my husband and I (in our 40's) are in the top few percent financially for our generation. Now I know how much we earn and it's not that much. I also know that I save for Christmas every week of the year, I produce all the meat and eggs we eat and most of the dairy products. I buy my clothes in a 2nd hand store, and my children at any time of the year have one pair of shoes each and one pair of gumboots. Our vehicles are second hand and scratched and dented but they are ours, free and clear.

So how do we fit in that top bracket? We are very frugal and we paid off our mortgage as fast as we could. It turns out our property that we built from scratch is worth a great deal of money. What started out as a 10 acre field is now highly desirable. And we don't have any debt.

Do we deserve to own such a desirable property? Yes we do. We've worked so hard for it - and I mean hard, long tough hours. We don't stop. We are grafters and our labour has produced something of beauty.

Last week I went browsing in some lovely gift shops in the city. I haven't been is such shops for a long time and what surprised me was how desirable and attractive the stuff was. It was all useless and a waste of money but I found myself thinking "oh I'd like that". Thankfully I quickly saw sense and left but I was amazed just how quickly I was sucked into the whole consumerism thing. 

The thing is that money isn't bad or good, it's merely a tool. It's what you do with money that is bad or good. We are finishing our new house and about to put the kitchen in. I paid $30 for my second hand stainless steel double sink, $100 for my dishwasher. All my units came were being thrown out by someone else. They are solid wood and with some effort and my husbands carpentry skills, they will look fantastic when they are finished. 

Do I feel cheated that I'm not getting a brand new designer kitchen? No. I could have one if I wanted one, but there are other things I want more than a sparkly new kitchen. 


ASB, there might not be social classes in America but there are economic classes in every country on earth. Perhaps this is what Satori was referring to. 

ViQueen, I can't bring myself to sign up for satelite tv because it's such a huge waste of money. We had it once and whilst it was enjoyable we found ourselves watching more and more just so we didn't miss anything. Thankfully we got rid of it. Now we do other things with our time. I'm a great supporter of the local library and chomp my way through a pile of books every fortnight. 


Those who got it wrong, for whatever reason, may feel defensive and retrench into a position that doesn’t accord with the facts.
Back to Top
KiwiMum View Drop Down
Chief Moderator
Chief Moderator
Avatar

Joined: May 29 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 29670
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KiwiMum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 05 2014 at 5:47pm
I'm not sure if this is off topic to this thread but I thought I'd share with you some of the ways I get stuff for free or for very little:

Firstly I think long and hard about what I want. I make a list of things I need and then I take my time finding them rather than shopping for instant gratification. 

I only every buy food on special. So if I want tinned beans,  and we eat 2 tins a week, I'll wait until they are on special and buy 12 cans, enough to last us until the next special. So my weekly shop involves multiples of everything. The same goes on toilettries.

I never buy ready made meals. I buy bulk basic ingredients and cook from scratch. So the other day I made a korma curry with 2 homegrown rabbits (and rabbit is the BEST meat for curries because of its wonderful texture). So I made enough for 2 big meals and put one in the freezer. Yesterday I made bolognese sauce and again put enough for one meal in the freezer in those foil tubs with a lid. 

If I want something that is a big purchase then I try to find it for free first. A perfect example is I wanted a small glasshouse. Now it happened I drove past one full of weeds and with some broken glass every time I went to town. So one day I stopped and knocked on the door and asked the lady if she might like to sell it to me. She was overjoyed. She refused to take any money at all. It turned out that she had been asking her son for a few years to get rid of it for her. I insisted on paying her something so she accepted some trays of eggs over the following few weeks. 

I know you might not believe me, but by using that method I was also given a whole house to relocate if I wanted it. (As it happened I didn't take it but it was a genuine offer). By way of return I also give away stuff I no longer want. I never bother to sell stuff on line. What goes around comes around and I once gave away a portable office to someone who needed it. 

Other things I do is that I am extremely friendly and pleasant to everyone I meet and in shops I ask for discounts and reductions and most times I get them. I make a point of knowing and remembering peoples names, so in my local shops I know the staff.  I also mention to other people what I'm looking for and how I haven't got much money to spend. You'd be amazed what turns up. 

I guess it comes down to confidence. My mother in law thinks anything second hand is shameful and something to be embarrassed about. That poverty is to be hidden. I disagree. There is no shame in poverty but there is in debt. Not many people can bear admitting that they are on a tight budget. We all want to appear to be living the dream. 

Whenever I go to make a big purchase, I make sure to take my old truck and to wear my worn out jeans and an old shirt. I make sure I have small bills in my purse too. People feel sorry for me and that's fine. My friend drives a brand new Toyota Prado, wears designer clothes and she never gets discounts. She always has to pay full price. 

I'm so scruffy that just recently I was in a petrol station and I asked if they had a certain type of icecream, which they didn't have, so I declined to get different type. The lady working there thought I couldn't afford the other type and so offered me one for free, her treat!! You gotta laugh!

I still can't bring myself to buy a coffee, not when I can make one at home for a fraction of the price. But on the other hand I buy the best quality gumboots ever at $200 a pair because I practically live in them and it would be a false economy to buy cheap. It's swings and roundabouts. 

Just remember the golden rules when asking for a discount are 1) look like you need it, 2) be friendly and don't demand it, rather ask in a quiet and humble way, 3) allow the other person to say no and still be friendly. I've had people say no and I've said oh never mind, I understand, thanks anyway, and then they've changed their mind and given me one anyway. and 4) always say "thank you, I appreciate that" if you do get one. 

My best way of asking is I say to the assistant "I really like this but it's a bit more than I had hoped to spend. Is there any chance of discount please?" By using these words you haven't backed yourself into a corner, you can still buy it at the full price if there is no discount available without losing face. Also you are allowing the assistant to say no, sorry no discount, without putting their back up. If you really can't afford it at the full price and they say no, then ask nicely if they think it will be on special any time soon. I did this last week and the manager of our local bookshop handed me a card and told me that the following Saturday there was friends and family discount of 25% on anything in the shop. He gave me his friends voucher and I saved $20. How kind was that?
Those who got it wrong, for whatever reason, may feel defensive and retrench into a position that doesn’t accord with the facts.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 05 2014 at 6:19pm
A recession is when your neighbor loses his job. A depression is when you lose your job.
Back to Top
ViQueen24 View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group
Avatar

Joined: May 14 2013
Location: Verona, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 12270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ViQueen24 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 05 2014 at 10:20pm
Good stuff, KiwiMum. The thing is, you have a large and practical skill set, that, as you have demonstrated, holds the key to prosperity and true economic freedom, when applied properly, as you have done.

I think for the most part here in the States, at least in my neck of the woods, that kind of skill set has faded so far away that it would never occur to the current generation to acquire it. For them, it would be like moving to the moon. Most of them have never even cooked anything from scratch and look befuddled when I tell them my grandmother used to bake a 25 pound bag of flour into bread for her family every Wednesday.

I don't miss the satellite dish. I certainly don't miss paying the outrageous bill every month. I have more time to read, to do things around my house that need doing, and more money to prep with. A good trade, if you ask me. My mother, however, does not agree.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down