Click to Translate to English Click to Translate to French  Click to Translate to Spanish  Click to Translate to German  Click to Translate to Italian  Click to Translate to Japanese  Click to Translate to Chinese Simplified  Click to Translate to Korean  Click to Translate to Arabic  Click to Translate to Russian  Click to Translate to Portuguese  Click to Translate to Myanmar (Burmese)

PANDEMIC ALERT LEVEL
123456
Forum Home Forum Home > Main Forums > Latest News
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Who says we are at pandemic alert
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk

Who says we are at pandemic alert

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
meewee View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: December 13 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 595
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote meewee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Who says we are at pandemic alert
    Posted: January 30 2006 at 2:43pm

< Back to previous page

Home > Health | Topic: Bird Flu | Region: United States > San Francisco

Draft Bird Flu Plan Presented to Public

By Amy Rooker
Epoch Times San Francisco Staff
Jan 30, 2006

U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt speaks during a meeting on pandemic planning in Washington, DC. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
High-res image (3000 x 2000 px, 300 dpi)

The California Department of Health Services has introduced its response plan for the State in the event of a major influenza outbreak. The draft Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Plan is an instruction model for agencies across California to follow if a highly contagious influenza outbreak occurs. The plan has been presented for public comment, and feedback on the plan is being requested by the California Department of Health Services.

"California has in place the essential building blocks to protect the public from a pandemic," said State Public Health Officer Dr. Mark Horton, in a press release issued by the California Department of Health Services. "However, everyone—individuals, communities, private industry and all levels of government—must become actively engaged to prepare for a pandemic. While we cannot prevent a pandemic, with proper preparation we can lessen its impact."

The draft Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Plan points to California's emergency response structure as a foundation for response coordination in case of an outbreak. The plan details various measures for agency response. It indicates how laboratories, hospitals, and clinic surveillance will monitor for early detection.

The plan also outlines medical and non-medical ways to help control the spread of a pandemic influenza outbreak, as well as plans for vaccine and antiviral stockpiling and distribution. Additionally, the plan covers how to deal with the overcrowding of hospitals and clinics if a wide-scale pandemic influenza were to strike.

The World Health Organization reported in January 2006 that several human cases of avian flu have now been reported outside of Asia, in parts of Eastern Europe. A small but slowly increasing number of fatalities in humans from the avian flu in the last three years have recently raised concerns over the possibility of a large-scale influenza outbreak occurring in the near future.

According to the World Health Organization, the bird flu strain known as Influenza A (H5N1) is now classified as a pandemic alert, which is one level below a full-scale pandemic. The pandemic alert status of the virus means that there are recorded cases of the avian flu virus known as H5N1 being transmitted from birds to humans. However, humans are not contagious to other humans, and cannot spread the avian flu strain H5N1.

The concern is that the avian flu H5N1 virus could mutate, and then spread through human-to-human contact. The avian flu H5N1 has a 50 percent mortality rate, and an outbreak could be deadly. If the avian flu were to become contagious through human-to-human contact, which it is not at this time, the World Health Organization would raise the status of the outbreak to the level of pandemic.

The United States Department of Health and Human Services recently allocated $100 million in funding for states' preparation for an influenza outbreak. According to a press release from the United States Department of Health and Human Services, HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said, "Pandemics happen globally but must be managed at the state and local level, and these funds will help communities meet that responsibility." He further stated, "Preparation works and it can save lives. We have the opportunity to become the first generation in history to prepare for a pandemic."


Copyright 2000 - 2005 Epoch Times International

How nice of them to let us know! now when did this happen?

Meewee

God Bless us all!
Back to Top
meewee View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: December 13 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 595
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote meewee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 2:46pm

Does this mean that we are at level 4 or 5 now???? What's going on here?

Meewee

God Bless us all!
Back to Top
libbyalex View Drop Down
Adviser Group
Adviser Group


Joined: December 20 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 795
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote libbyalex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 3:18pm
The wording in this article is very confusing. On the one hand, they say we're one level below a pandemic -- which would be level 5. On the other hand, they say humans are not contagious to other humans, which could still be interpreted as being at level 3. Of course, WHO's website still says level 3. Anyone else have an idea??? -- Libby
Back to Top
Corn View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member


Joined: December 13 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1219
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Corn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 8:11pm
i'm confused by all the double talk. i would say by observing the reports around the world we are at the early stages of level 4. slow but sure.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 8:20pm

We should be at a 4, no doubt in my mind!  But so far there is no SUSTAINED H-2-H. 

From all that I have read it is very rare to go to a third person, although there have been a few.  But I don't remember reading about a 4 or more long chain of infection.  That is what WHO is waiting on.

But I do agree that the rhetoric is being deliberately ratcheted up.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 8:22pm

Something else just occurred to me...

I wonder if the EPOCH times reporter isn't confusing old guidelines for levels of alert and the new ones that split the alert into 6 levels.

Back to Top
Joel Benjamin View Drop Down
Valued Member
Valued Member
Avatar

Joined: December 23 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Joel Benjamin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 8:40pm
I hate to be the harbinger of bad news. but I read that 30 samples are being analyzed from Northern Iraq. Thirty sample from thirty people is what I  take this to mean. They are not analyzing samples from birds. I just watched a public TV program on the 1918 flu, the first attempt to educate the public. Connect the dots. 
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 30 2006 at 8:53pm

Hey Joel, long time no see.

I wondered about the number of samples too.  I'm divided: Are they samples from 30 different people or are they multiple samples from X number of people.  You know, nasal, throat, spit, blood, etc.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down