Tracking the next pandemic: Avian Flu Talk |
Ziploc: There’s No Better Way to Protect Your Se |
Post Reply |
Author | |
arirish
Admin Group Joined: June 19 2013 Location: Arkansas Status: Offline Points: 39215 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: July 21 2014 at 7:24am |
Ziploc: There’s No Better Way to Protect Your Select Agent Investment Kelly Hills Kelly Hills Life as an Extreme Sport Posted: Jul 18, 2014 A lot of interesting testimony came out of yesterday’s House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee hearing, which was titled “Review of CDC Anthrax Lab Incident,” but broadly covered the numerous slapstick-’cept-it-ain’t-funny errors around dangerous pathogens research at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. I don’t know about you, but I feel safer already. For those just joining the conversation, these hilarious mishaps have included leaving activated anthrax in unlocked, unsecured refrigerators; mixing high pathogenicity avian influenza with low pathogenicity avian influenza and then shipping it over to the US Department of Agriculture in the worst version of novelty surprise in a can ever; and using ziploc bags to transport petri dishes between labs. And as an added bonus, there was some discussion about the broader issues of the proliferation of biosafety laboratories working on select agents. In particular, the statement of Nancy Kingsbury, PhD, the Managing Director, Applied Research and Methods, at the Government Accountability office, is worth a read. The statement pulls no punches, saying: No federal entity is responsible for strategic planning and oversight of high-containment laboratories. … No one agency is responsible for determining the aggregate or cumulative risks associated with the continued expansion of high-containment laboratories; according to experts and federal officials GAO interviewed for prior work, the oversight of these laboratories is fragmented and largely self-policing. In fact, since 2001, the proliferation of biosafety laboratories has resulted in nearly 1500 laboratories in the United States alone that handle and do research on dangerous pathogens. If only there were some sort of national advisory board for biosecuri-oh wait! Except, as has already been noted, the NSABB hasn’t met in nearly two years. But that’s okay, you see; the current chair of the NSABB1 wants you to know that this is intentional! Samuel L. Stanley Jr., MD, says that the NSABB has “been waiting essentially for the new federal guidelines to come out on institutional implementation of DURC policy. We wanted to have a look at what the federal agencies would come up with.”2 One job. You guys had one job. Well, wait. Okay. This can easily be clarified by looking at the NSABB charter, which was recently revised, so clearly it is timely and up-to-date and will clarif- The NSABB will provide advice on and recommend specific strategies for the efficient and effective oversight of federally conducted or supported dual use biological research, taking into consideration both national security concerns and the needs of the research community to foster continued rapid progress in public health and agricultural research.3 Damnit.4 In Stanley’s defense, he argues that these recent “issues” at the CDC are surely concerning as a scientist, but they’re really not about dual-use or gain of function research, so they don’t involve the NSABB. It wasn’t, you see, created to be about biosafety. It’s really such a bitch when the first bulleted item on the list of “description of duties” on your charter contradicts the interviews you give: Recommend strategies and guidance for enhancing personnel reliability among individuals with access to biological select agents and toxins.5 Funny thing. The last time I looked, anthrax sure as hell was a select agent. Oh look! So is H5N1. Your move, Stanley. I suggest it involve picking up a phone and dialing 11 different numbers. •Someone who has been the chair since 2012, so you do the math on how much practice he actually has being the chair of an organization that hasn’t met since… yup, 2012. [↩] •All of Stanley’s comments in this blog post are taken from CIDRAP‘s interview with him. Hi! Love you guys! [↩] •“Objectives and Scope of Activities,” NSABB Charter 2014. [↩] •Fun bonus note: the NSABB is, per their very own charter, supposed to be meeting twice every fiscal year. Should I give Stanley the benefit of the doubt to assume this is new with the 2014 charter, and that everyone would have loved to have met in the previous two years, but there just wasn’t anything going on in dual-use or gain of function rese…nevermind. [↩] •“Description of Duties,” NSABB 2014 Charter. |
|
Buy more ammo!
|
|
onefluover
Admin Group Joined: April 21 2013 Location: Death Valleyish Status: Offline Points: 20151 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Watch the movie-length video Chuck posted. It substantiates much of what has been discussed here for years.
|
|
"And then there were none."
|
|
jacksdad
Executive Admin Joined: September 08 2007 Location: San Diego Status: Offline Points: 47251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Nicely written
|
|
"Buy it cheap. Stack it deep"
"Any community that fails to prepare, with the expectation that the federal government will come to the rescue, will be tragically wrong." Michael Leavitt, HHS Secretary. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum |